• Debian Calibre is not migrate to testing because of "missing builds"

    From yokota@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 9 06:40:01 2022
    Hello, Debian-QA.

    I'm maintaining Debian "calibre" package.
    https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/calibre

    Recently, I was upload new version package.
    This is major upgrade, and uses Qt6 and Qt6-WebEngine.

    Qt6-WebEngine drops mips64el and mipsel support, so britney2 complains
    about "missing builds" on "calibre" package and will not migrate to
    testing distribution.

    I read about this issue on:
    https://release.debian.org/doc/britney/solutions-to-common-policy-issues.html and fix my "debian/control" file, but migration is still prevented by
    "missing build".

    Do you have any suggestions about this issue?

    Thanks.
    --
    YOKOTA Hiroshi

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam Borowski@21:1/5 to yokota on Tue Aug 9 09:40:02 2022
    On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 01:12:27PM +0900, yokota wrote:
    I'm maintaining Debian "calibre" package.
    https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/calibre

    Recently, I was upload new version package.
    This is major upgrade, and uses Qt6 and Qt6-WebEngine.

    Qt6-WebEngine drops mips64el and mipsel support, so britney2 complains
    about "missing builds" on "calibre" package and will not migrate to
    testing distribution.

    calibre-bin | 5.44.0+dfsg-1 | testing | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel
    calibre-bin | 5.44.0+dfsg-1 | unstable | mips64el, mipsel calibre-bin | 6.2.1+dfsg-7 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386

    There's still mips64el and mipsel in testing, thus you need to file a RM
    for them. The lack of builds on these archs is a regression, thus needs
    to be handled manually.


    Meow!
    --
    ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
    ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Vat kind uf sufficiently advanced technology iz dis!? ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- Genghis Ht'rok'din ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)