I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way
too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect
would also be OK IMO.
I started a wiki page to document how to transition from lintian.d.o to
the UDD implementation. That could be useful if you turn lintian.d.o
into a static page saying it has been shutdown, and want to point
somewhere to help people transition.
https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg
I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect would also be OK IMO.
I started a wiki page to document how to transition from lintian.d.o to the UDD implementation. That could be useful if you turn lintian.d.o
into a static page saying it has been shutdown, and want to point somewhere to help people transition.
https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg
Hi DSA,
So,
- lintian.debian.org has now been providing stale data for almost a year
- the replacement running on top of UDD has been working fine since
July, and is already used by at least tracker.d.o and
qa.d.o/developer.php
- nobody has objected shutting down lintian.debian.org
How can we move forward with the shutdown of lintian.debian.org?
Hi DSA,
On 23/12/22 at 17:17 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi DSA,I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way >> > > > too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect
would also be OK IMO.
I started a wiki page to document how to transition from lintian.d.o to >> > > the UDD implementation. That could be useful if you turn lintian.d.o
into a static page saying it has been shutdown, and want to point
somewhere to help people transition.
https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg >>
So,
- lintian.debian.org has now been providing stale data for almost a year
- the replacement running on top of UDD has been working fine since
July, and is already used by at least tracker.d.o and
qa.d.o/developer.php
- nobody has objected shutting down lintian.debian.org
How can we move forward with the shutdown of lintian.debian.org?
lintian.debian.org came up again in a discussion https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033065#54
People are confused. Maybe it's time to stop it and point to https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg
?
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> wrote on 03/04/2023 at 07:21:38+0200:
Hi DSA,
On 23/12/22 at 17:17 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi DSA,I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way
too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect >> > > > would also be OK IMO.
I started a wiki page to document how to transition from lintian.d.o to
the UDD implementation. That could be useful if you turn lintian.d.o >> > > into a static page saying it has been shutdown, and want to point
somewhere to help people transition.
https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg >>
So,
- lintian.debian.org has now been providing stale data for almost a year >> - the replacement running on top of UDD has been working fine since
July, and is already used by at least tracker.d.o and
qa.d.o/developer.php
- nobody has objected shutting down lintian.debian.org
How can we move forward with the shutdown of lintian.debian.org?
lintian.debian.org came up again in a discussion https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033065#54
People are confused. Maybe it's time to stop it and point to https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg
?
Could you file a RT ticket? if there's already one, can you point it to
me, a brief overlook didn't bring it to me.
As soon as I have this, I'll try to do what's needed.
Cheers!
--
PEB
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 493 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 177:29:37 |
Calls: | 9,705 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 13,736 |
Messages: | 6,179,051 |