• Re: svn false positives (was ... (mass) svn-to-git migration)

    From Diederik de Haas@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 4 00:52:23 2023
    On Friday, 27 January 2023 20:14:43 CET Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
    I've been looking at how to do a mass conversion. There's about 375 packages still listed as being on alioth (~100 in SVN, ~267 in Git, the rest in something else). https://janitor.debian.net/cupboard/result-codes/hosted-on-alioth?campaign=u nchanged&include_transient=off&include_historical=off

    I searched that list and checked a few of them ... and they all seem to be on salsa already. What's the best way to deal with those?

    If I want to trim down the result list ASAP so I could focus on the ones who actually do need a conversion, should/could I use that page or would it be better if I keep a local document (for now), where I'd remove the false positives. (Fixing things properly will be for another time)

    Here are the 'false positives' I found (tdo = tracker.debian.org):

    libvorbisspi-java:
    https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libvorbisspi-java
    Notes: d/control is updated but it has not be uploaded to Debian

    colorpicker:
    https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/colorpicker/
    Notes: d/control is NOT updated

    libjrosetta-java:
    https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libjrosetta-java/
    Notes: d/control updated to point to https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-java/ libjrosetta-java.git ...
    The above 3 are all from pkg-java, so they may all be converted, but haven't checked that

    psicode:
    https://salsa.debian.org/debichem-team/psi4
    Notes: If you go to the homepage on tdo/psicode you're greeted by PSI4 and searching on salsa found the above repo. There is also tdo/psi4 which appears properly maintained, apart from still having an old version from 2019-05-17, while upstream released several new ones.
    I'd guess that tdo/psicode is abandoned in favor of tdo/psi4. Last uploader of psicode is also uploader of psi4.

    nautilus-image-converter: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/nautilus-image-converter
    Notes: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nautilus-image-converter seems to be fine, but it is maintained by Debian QA Group !?!
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCY92eNwAKCRDXblvOeH7b boFoAQCQZv+NnsI+D5eDzrgdtttMQZEj42jKe30ymkTLBbewCgD8Ci4jbZzPNNmX Hy2+RyQWRIRNsu/AJTJDKRC1vY1D9gk=
    =PbXA
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mattia Rizzolo@21:1/5 to Diederik de Haas on Mon Feb 6 11:50:01 2023
    On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
    I searched that list and checked a few of them ... and they all seem to be on
    salsa already. What's the best way to deal with those?

    Since the authoritative data is what's in the Sources file, I'd say
    please upload the packages with an updated d/control.

    Even if janitor and vcswatch grew some exception list/hadling, it would
    hardly propagate to other services and users, so....

    --
    regards,
    Mattia Rizzolo

    GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
    More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
    Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEi3hoeGwz5cZMTQpICBa54Yx2K60FAmPg2UgACgkQCBa54Yx2 K61x5RAArokJ8FU+ojGGOBsGTMr5NQnjrfXycajva6Ar5+JHyP/Fp65Gb+PmIFMb MEIBuvZDG+3xYj2JjQT2q9MyEBGn/ZYXmhKC8k/uvPmJdLbR8RRqVMrZOabkOSxV ugFtPCsYAY98sDqvRzjRLp1qCu+/Lbu/z2R9ONQy310HEpiHQWy6v/3SXoQ+dg9Z 0BNjn9yv5R9KjINUDaFwnF7mjCJMoNbgdLqIWjyrgxVhZrmKvq+NtHp0q0wCAA+L xuJARoe8JPTGjFyBObZyPosMzCY3Lwe0cicdArmeTsLDGxqHAuvbyhHHIkqQyPyC /ML95P05qDSCz38WUFqT2F4h+CChvqaDQ/qvRiOwsdzmyUvAM5NW1JuIOKN8G3Ud 5TkBdZDncW0TryJFBIOtaGN8oH5Uwzmr1pRSEDqpVmw0a6gaF/71KOrtzDHA0iMf PGHR/3Ex9j2Qteyh63Uhxhzy+XxIlI+KSbEmnOL/557gBnSeP10KckFpv9HkPvML wBrAmH66Tx349toftPNJgzTX+tAz51Ol+6KDmH6YLUNDS2cwdBz
  • From Diederik de Haas@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 6 13:51:31 2023
    On Monday, 6 February 2023 11:41:15 CET Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
    I searched that list and checked a few of them ... and they all seem to be on salsa already. What's the best way to deal with those?

    Since the authoritative data is what's in the Sources file, I'd say
    please upload the packages with an updated d/control.

    I assumed that was the case, but didn't know.
    But I'm not a DD so I can't do that.

    I'll go for the local document (for now).
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCY+D30wAKCRDXblvOeH7b bnxAAQDd3NTMD+mtqZIWOLHZwKaCUdyXPZhq2NAjjv/xyfMbNgEA0tLa1t9Ect3O S4wi17jj6l5WYY4vAmIJbWnKuFUBtwY=
    =Q6Ih
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)