1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.USER

  • opinion - apt-mirror or aptly

    From fxkl47BF@protonmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 17 08:00:01 2024
    i intend to create a local mirror for debian armhf
    it seems apt-mirror and aptly are the applications most used
    is one easier, more reliable, ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tomas@tuxteam.de@21:1/5 to fxkl47BF@protonmail.com on Wed Apr 17 08:30:01 2024
    On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 05:49:29AM +0000, fxkl47BF@protonmail.com wrote:
    i intend to create a local mirror for debian armhf
    it seems apt-mirror and aptly are the applications most used
    is one easier, more reliable, ...

    Has it to be a mirror, or would a cache do? I'm asking, because
    a cache is easier to set up, *and* much easier to use.

    What are your aims?

    Cheers
    --
    t

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZh9r1AAKCRAFyCz1etHa Rn3qAJ90+YQrrKWdMzU43EGxnqX9GBpAMQCeIs/uL6yiYfDXW3mDcRzFtbfrdwc=
    =5WOy
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Ritter@21:1/5 to fxkl47BF@protonmail.com on Wed Apr 17 13:10:02 2024
    fxkl47BF@protonmail.com wrote:
    i intend to create a local mirror for debian armhf
    it seems apt-mirror and aptly are the applications most used
    is one easier, more reliable, ...


    If all you want is a local mirror, apt-mirror is less
    configuration.

    If you want a more complicated system -- for example, taking
    multiple upstream repos and consolidating them into one local
    mirror, which then is branched into a testing repo and a
    production repo -- you need aptly.

    -dsr-

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)