• Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for

    From Greg Wooledge@21:1/5 to Max Nikulin on Sun Jun 2 05:20:01 2024
    On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 10:02:58AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
    On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
    If you change subject
    or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email accordingly so that this can be clearly seen.

    For example: New question [WAS Old topic]

    Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:"
    subject part from response subject. Perhaps Gnus may treat square brackets
    as well. I have no idea concerning other mailers.

    My despair and agony increase every time I hear about some new abomination
    that people's mail user agents perform by default.

    *face palms, shakes head*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew M.A. Cater@21:1/5 to Max Nikulin on Sun Jun 2 12:10:01 2024
    On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 10:02:58AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
    On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
    If you change subject
    or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email accordingly so that this can be clearly seen.

    For example: New question [WAS Old topic]

    Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:"
    subject part from response subject. Perhaps Gnus may treat square brackets
    as well. I have no idea concerning other mailers.


    No - the square brackets are an example :)

    Square brackets can be noticed, perhaps, and the effort to type them may
    be worth the distinctiveness, but what I really wanted was to make the distinction visually clear so that the reader would notice it..

    I routinely type ammedments to the subject in square brackets and
    add WAS in upper case so that this is immediately apparent in a long
    email thread. Whatever your mailer does is fine but it needs to stand out clearly. Similarly, whenever I reply to something on behalf of the
    Community Team, I add that in square brackets to show that it is
    distinct.

    New topic - brackets or parentheses (WAS: Debian-user Monthly FAQ)
    might be appropriate here. So that email subjects don't go beyond 72 characters, you may always need to abbreviate the amended subject.

    [WAS: WAS: WAS (previous subject)] would be too many levels of off-topic discussion - but this discussion is still, just about, on topic.

    All the very best, as ever,

    Andy Cater
    (amacater@debian.org)



    Sorry for violating the rule. Curious users may test if their MUAs recognize "(was: ...)" in the subject and remove old part.




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)