On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name registration industry.
No need. We all stumble in the dark :-)
I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and its DNS
showed that there was no record (nxdomain) at the registry.
No. This only means that there is no DNS record for that name. Very
strictly speaking, that your name server doesn't know that there is
one (but generally, DNS works globally, so).
First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name registration industry.
I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and its DNS
showed that there was no record (nxdomain) at the registry.
However, when I
checked whois, it showed that the domain name was already registered at the registrar. Why is this?
On 19/8/24 16:11, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name registration industry.
No need. We all stumble in the dark :-)
I think that a simpler way of explaining What Tomas has said, is that
someone has registered the domain name, but, has not set up web hosting for it, so, the domain name is registered, but, the person who registered it,
has not set up a web site for it.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:I think that a simpler way of explaining What Tomas has said, is that
First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name
registration industry.
No need. We all stumble in the dark :-)
I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and its DNS
showed that there was no record (nxdomain) at the registry.
No. This only means that there is no DNS record for that name. Very
strictly speaking, that your name server doesn't know that there is
one (but generally, DNS works globally, so).
However, when I
checked whois, it showed that the domain name was already registered at the >> registrar. Why is this?
And that means that the name (space) was reserved at some point. It doesn't mean it has to be used -- just that whoever reserved (registered) it can
use it at some point in time.
Cheers
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 08:51:15PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On 19/8/24 16:11, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name >>>> registration industry.
No need. We all stumble in the dark :-)
[...]
I think that a simpler way of explaining What Tomas has said, is that
someone has registered the domain name, but, has not set up web hosting for >> it, so, the domain name is registered, but, the person who registered it,
has not set up a web site for it.
Even less than that: just a DNS record, i.e. some entry in the global
name database mapping the name to... anything (an IP address, another
name, a mail exchange, whatever).
You can reserve the name and postpone creating a DNS record for it.
As often, the Wikipedia [1] gives a good read on that.
Cheers
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS
On 19/8/24 21:00, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
Even less than that: just a DNS record, i.e. some entry in the global
name database mapping the name to... anything (an IP address, another
name, a mail exchange, whatever).
You can reserve the name and postpone creating a DNS record for it.
As often, the Wikipedia [1] gives a good read on that.
Cheers
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS
As a person who has a few web sites, the first step, is registering the domain name, then, the second step, is obtaining web hosting. Upon the obtaining of the web hosting, DNS addresses (the IP numbers for the DNS servers) (for, usually, each of the primary server and secondary server),
are then allocated. In the absence of obtaining web hosting, no DNS server
is allocated.
That is from my experience.
Your experience may be different.
As a person who has a few web sites, the first step, is registering the
domain name, then, the second step, is obtaining web hosting. Upon the
obtaining of the web hosting, DNS addresses (the IP numbers for the DNS
servers) (for, usually, each of the primary server and secondary server),
are then allocated. In the absence of obtaining web hosting, no DNS server >> is allocated.
That's because you are purchasing a bundle of services from one
company.
These things are all available separately:
TL;DR: I too find it a little odd that whois says this domain is reserved but querying the DNS shows that it isn't there at all as I would
usually expect just the NS records to be present in the containing
zone. I can only assume that this registrar allows for registered
zones to not be published at all if one wishes. The whois is
authoritative for what is available to register; the DNS is
authoritative for what you can globally query.
This is the dns info from registry nameserver:
;; SERVER: 10.160.0.1#53(10.160.0.1)
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;datafarm.net. IN A
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 04:35:34PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
TL;DR: I too find it a little odd that whois says this domain is reserved but
querying the DNS shows that it isn't there at all as I would
usually expect just the NS records to be present in the containing
zone. I can only assume that this registrar allows for registered
zones to not be published at all if one wishes. The whois is
authoritative for what is available to register; the DNS is
authoritative for what you can globally query.
There is no obligation to provide a working name server or serve DNS for a domain name. DNS and name registration are separate.
Hi,
TL;DR: I too find it a little odd that whois says this domain is
reserved but
querying the DNS shows that it isn't there at all as I would
usually expect just the NS records to be present in the containing
zone. I can only assume that this registrar allows for registered
zones to not be published at all if one wishes. The whois is
authoritative for what is available to register; the DNS is
authoritative for what you can globally query.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
This is the dns info from registry nameserver:
In future it would help if you showed what actual query you are
doing with "dig". From the output I can piece together that you did
something like:
$ dig datafarm.net
or
$ dig -t s datafarm.net
but assuming that indeed is what you did, it does not actually "ask
the registry nameserver".
We can see from your output that you got a response from:
;; SERVER: 10.160.0.1#53(10.160.0.1)
which is probably a resolver on your local network. So that answer
you got may have been from cache.
We can see from your output that you ended up (either implicitly or explicitly) asking for an A query:
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;datafarm.net. IN A
However the best record to use when trying to see if a domain exists
i*in DNS* is an SOA ("Start of Authority"). It should show where the
domain delegation happens. It's basically the details for the DNS
zone.
The dig from com's nameservers got nxdomain as well. As you see here,
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 149:51:15 |
Calls: | 10,383 |
Files: | 14,054 |
Messages: | 6,417,777 |