• domain status in registry and registrar

    From Wesley@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 19 09:50:01 2024
    First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name registration industry. I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and its
    DNS showed that there was no record (nxdomain) at the registry. However,
    when I checked whois, it showed that the domain name was already
    registered at the registrar. Why is this?

    This is the dns info from registry nameserver:

    ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> datafarm.net
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 7447
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;datafarm.net. IN A

    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
    net. 900 IN SOA a.gtld-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 1724053585
    1800 900 604800 86400

    ;; Query time: 1441 msec
    ;; SERVER: 10.160.0.1#53(10.160.0.1)
    ;; WHEN: Mon Aug 19 15:46:53 CST 2024
    ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 120


    And, this is the info from part of whois:

    Domain Name: DATAFARM.NET
    Registry Domain ID: 73273226_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
    Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
    Registrar URL: http://tucowsdomains.com
    Updated Date: 2024-05-27T04:03:20
    Creation Date: 2001-06-25T16:40:22
    Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-06-25T16:40:22
    Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.


    Thanks.
    --
    https://wespeng.pages.dev/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Purgert@21:1/5 to tomas@tuxteam.de on Mon Aug 19 11:00:01 2024
    On Aug 19, 2024, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
    First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name registration industry.

    No need. We all stumble in the dark :-)

    I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and its DNS
    showed that there was no record (nxdomain) at the registry.

    No. This only means that there is no DNS record for that name. Very
    strictly speaking, that your name server doesn't know that there is
    one (but generally, DNS works globally, so).

    Only if a global record was created. It's entirely possible that the
    domain serves an 'internal-only' purpose for the entity that registered
    it.


    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE3asj+xn6fYUcweBnbWVw5UznKGAFAmbDCBcACgkQbWVw5Uzn KGCAjA/+OveVPbHOfL1pwinu7Oau8i30psUztacYvDgANcU1YSiww0dswkfky1zF 3dgVRk8gCCNAKofbzcXegweWc+SLbGquPsYua/+BpogiryHQBaBKAFmPr503Tnpk 8rrJEm8ho313IdIYxZP5uyZ7uk0nWw/rA5P+e1MbTuqVPN3DBt11QyrYh1la8KQn u0YIW0sABXkrFyw93Hrb4Xz4mMc8x+Hmq/f+FWWYrttGPwYkkr2fDT9s76UL2ev7 ++2NQ8msBtUzeQDMUT0EF7VAAJc1Dhz12cdfmvjcxbZT5O9JrA4VZ8n2NSlLG+qy 3Y0lrOJ8oQ0biMqVfrzCiZq1qVqig/Pn24Crwg5a9vOEoOcuJIHxAlADHCL2wZ3B 8K2ct7EmYku41FlJGDVIPcDFg/u6gJCLIPIHQt+3u+6mwm4d91yf+KPoJ3/ElCm1 EaaBDDNFwn+lVk4F1yxtF5Md1e07C72k4WPOwOhL5lZOXXIpv3/Z6AuYZwpHJxUW tnrFvmrF0wRCHaj/LPW0fG3n2kDwawbgvRKWwVk4sOc5zQzyLWvRlLmTypYrU2pd svg6Df/FaARBYpk8gFIMBapCDQy6/YcpG0BFIXQ89lxhv7jDQMKXcqT6qNUO+jab LIMsxJImnVbFBlmQXpw/ez4Ht7UuPpPmShBaUY98KtQcSZ14loc=
    =Wy8Y
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Us
  • From tomas@tuxteam.de@21:1/5 to Wesley on Mon Aug 19 10:20:01 2024
    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
    First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name registration industry.

    No need. We all stumble in the dark :-)

    I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and its DNS
    showed that there was no record (nxdomain) at the registry.

    No. This only means that there is no DNS record for that name. Very
    strictly speaking, that your name server doesn't know that there is
    one (but generally, DNS works globally, so).

    However, when I
    checked whois, it showed that the domain name was already registered at the registrar. Why is this?

    And that means that the name (space) was reserved at some point. It doesn't mean it has to be used -- just that whoever reserved (registered) it can
    use it at some point in time.

    Cheers
    --
    t

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZsL+MAAKCRAFyCz1etHa RvPfAJ0bPBjMgN1ot8CSaU8oPHJ0Z52MuwCfT+HDBjyawWLnjFI9dmSjWjRLwX8=
    =i6EZ
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tomas@tuxteam.de@21:1/5 to Bret Busby on Mon Aug 19 15:10:02 2024
    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 08:51:15PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
    On 19/8/24 16:11, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
    First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name registration industry.

    No need. We all stumble in the dark :-)

    [...]

    I think that a simpler way of explaining What Tomas has said, is that
    someone has registered the domain name, but, has not set up web hosting for it, so, the domain name is registered, but, the person who registered it,
    has not set up a web site for it.

    Even less than that: just a DNS record, i.e. some entry in the global
    name database mapping the name to... anything (an IP address, another
    name, a mail exchange, whatever).

    You can reserve the name and postpone creating a DNS record for it.

    As often, the Wikipedia [1] gives a good read on that.

    Cheers

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS
    --
    t

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZsNB9gAKCRAFyCz1etHa RjQrAJ4omeumGjhH5h5Rnly/h+x/M4DpawCff2oOWZHnPF+mBTNf2u5n8xBaAC4=
    =0Thg
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bret Busby@21:1/5 to tomas@tuxteam.de on Mon Aug 19 15:00:01 2024
    On 19/8/24 16:11, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
    First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name
    registration industry.

    No need. We all stumble in the dark :-)

    I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and its DNS
    showed that there was no record (nxdomain) at the registry.

    No. This only means that there is no DNS record for that name. Very
    strictly speaking, that your name server doesn't know that there is
    one (but generally, DNS works globally, so).

    However, when I
    checked whois, it showed that the domain name was already registered at the >> registrar. Why is this?

    And that means that the name (space) was reserved at some point. It doesn't mean it has to be used -- just that whoever reserved (registered) it can
    use it at some point in time.

    Cheers
    I think that a simpler way of explaining What Tomas has said, is that
    someone has registered the domain name, but, has not set up web hosting
    for it, so, the domain name is registered, but, the person who
    registered it, has not set up a web site for it.

    ..
    Bret Busby
    Armadale
    West Australia
    (UTC+0800)
    ..............

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bret Busby@21:1/5 to tomas@tuxteam.de on Mon Aug 19 15:40:01 2024
    On 19/8/24 21:00, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 08:51:15PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
    On 19/8/24 16:11, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
    First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name >>>> registration industry.

    No need. We all stumble in the dark :-)

    [...]

    I think that a simpler way of explaining What Tomas has said, is that
    someone has registered the domain name, but, has not set up web hosting for >> it, so, the domain name is registered, but, the person who registered it,
    has not set up a web site for it.

    Even less than that: just a DNS record, i.e. some entry in the global
    name database mapping the name to... anything (an IP address, another
    name, a mail exchange, whatever).

    You can reserve the name and postpone creating a DNS record for it.

    As often, the Wikipedia [1] gives a good read on that.

    Cheers

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS


    As a person who has a few web sites, the first step, is registering the
    domain name, then, the second step, is obtaining web hosting. Upon the obtaining of the web hosting, DNS addresses (the IP numbers for the DNS servers) (for, usually, each of the primary server and secondary
    server), are then allocated. In the absence of obtaining web hosting, no
    DNS server is allocated.

    That is from my experience.

    Your experience may be different.

    ..
    Bret Busby
    Armadale
    West Australia
    (UTC+0800)
    ..............

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Ritter@21:1/5 to Bret Busby on Mon Aug 19 16:10:02 2024
    Bret Busby wrote:
    On 19/8/24 21:00, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:

    Even less than that: just a DNS record, i.e. some entry in the global
    name database mapping the name to... anything (an IP address, another
    name, a mail exchange, whatever).

    You can reserve the name and postpone creating a DNS record for it.

    As often, the Wikipedia [1] gives a good read on that.

    Cheers

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS


    As a person who has a few web sites, the first step, is registering the domain name, then, the second step, is obtaining web hosting. Upon the obtaining of the web hosting, DNS addresses (the IP numbers for the DNS servers) (for, usually, each of the primary server and secondary server),
    are then allocated. In the absence of obtaining web hosting, no DNS server
    is allocated.

    That is from my experience.

    Your experience may be different.

    That's because you are purchasing a bundle of services from one
    company.

    These things are all available separately:

    - domain name registration (annual fee) - establishes the name
    of busby.net and points it at one or more name servers

    - domain name service (can be self-hosted, or provided through a
    free or paid service, or a combination) - maintains and
    updates records for www.busby.net, mail.busby.net, etc. to
    translate names into IP addresses.

    - mail service (can be self-hosted or otherwise)

    - basic web hosting (same)

    and whatever else you'd like.

    -dsr-

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael =?utf-8?B?S2rDtnJsaW5n?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 19 16:30:01 2024
    On 19 Aug 2024 09:45 -0400, from dsr@randomstring.org (Dan Ritter):
    As a person who has a few web sites, the first step, is registering the
    domain name, then, the second step, is obtaining web hosting. Upon the
    obtaining of the web hosting, DNS addresses (the IP numbers for the DNS
    servers) (for, usually, each of the primary server and secondary server),
    are then allocated. In the absence of obtaining web hosting, no DNS server >> is allocated.

    That's because you are purchasing a bundle of services from one
    company.

    These things are all available separately:

    And of course, just because you have a domain name doesn't mean you
    must host a web site on or under it.

    The Internet is more than only the Web.

    --
    Michael Kjörling 🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Grant@21:1/5 to Andy Smith on Mon Aug 19 18:50:01 2024
    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 04:35:34PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
    TL;DR: I too find it a little odd that whois says this domain is reserved but querying the DNS shows that it isn't there at all as I would
    usually expect just the NS records to be present in the containing
    zone. I can only assume that this registrar allows for registered
    zones to not be published at all if one wishes. The whois is
    authoritative for what is available to register; the DNS is
    authoritative for what you can globally query.

    There is no obligation to provide a working name server or serve DNS for a domain name. DNS and name registration are separate.

    If you want to know if a domain name is available, try to buy it, or
    try to do a whois on it, but I have found that not all TLDs support whois.

    But beware... I have seen cases where I have tried to buy a domain
    and then a short while later, someone else buys it! There is a way to
    look at who is querying domains even if they don't resolve.

    Michael Grant

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEDXVee01gWrPIdWPRwgRAue7sYQMFAmbDdu4ACgkQwgRAue7s YQPNcA//TrKBPobSyGyjorN+8I+roF6KRWUI4VMwuxIYeBz/uEfGYVjGC9gGHXqm Vv19MY8zLakVD00k1LGKlRFbeh+AtrX35PmaOBIhPeY08nNT+o9Dv0VNtf9UhMs3 XL2/08GMBfnnuBYQTqpvgteSenSjORRtx4Vc1ctUE+MiLwegAGT0fVJR/0xmbhgW LIXEv/2ue5nrcjlqChLQBYrefzIZzvbQXJDXT9vRWiejyuPdCfvVdzmA21tgYSlG FPA5GQjtEQAFig0+cHuI7VRGWrsmgmCQOREIdtMz3RCuPuWJiyW803MxEq79atDb g5BcEc179JHmE0SvYnMlvV2owAjE7y1hxuy5AjwnGSbzTcfzvrZktTVfVAWen87z m8m1pCIhhCNuyfo6unJfQq81uGQah4vLoFDmVHtLYmrxFCLjY+JRa1t0rpdhoZkC tom+fi4t0By7iGTYomgHW7iXsYBn3xtACqxBgcwQy02fLj7bdyIHw8X11gadSDRU QZlPoW8+qzx+FtVV6sDBFTM9zHpT9Fq3ddpZ4HMYSWTTpyakwldp7r7Qk/XoBawJ 0TmQJWbwBfxR362wexLbT52NMtONLPnbdUFMN+F2UV/0RQOcTZZ+roSfcwgIoJTf lNSr8756XI5elTg3GB13dSUZPCIdRcnfC305MY0CQRI07T3ykxY=
    =q03a
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Smith@21:1/5 to Wesley on Mon Aug 19 18:40:01 2024
    Hi,

    TL;DR: I too find it a little odd that whois says this domain is reserved but querying the DNS shows that it isn't there at all as I would
    usually expect just the NS records to be present in the containing
    zone. I can only assume that this registrar allows for registered
    zones to not be published at all if one wishes. The whois is
    authoritative for what is available to register; the DNS is
    authoritative for what you can globally query.

    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
    This is the dns info from registry nameserver:

    In future it would help if you showed what actual query you are
    doing with "dig". From the output I can piece together that you did
    something like:

    $ dig datafarm.net

    or

    $ dig -t s datafarm.net

    but assuming that indeed is what you did, it does not actually "ask
    the registry nameserver".

    We can see from your output that you got a response from:

    ;; SERVER: 10.160.0.1#53(10.160.0.1)

    which is probably a resolver on your local network. So that answer
    you got may have been from cache.

    We can see from your output that you ended up (either implicitly or
    explicitly) asking for an A query:

    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;datafarm.net. IN A

    However the best record to use when trying to see if a domain exists
    i*in DNS* is an SOA ("Start of Authority"). It should show where the
    domain delegation happens. It's basically the details for the DNS
    zone.

    By asking for an A record you run the risk of getting an empty
    answer just because that record type doesn't exist. There is after
    all no particular reason for an A record to exist for the root of a
    domain that is registered. There is no reason why the only record in
    that zone might not be

    just.to.annoy.wesley.datafarm.net.

    in which case there would be no A record for datafarm.net.

    But! Here a technicality of DNS that does come to our aid anyway.
    NXDOMAIN is for when the name does not exist at all. If the name
    xists but the record type you queried for does not exist, you would
    expect to get a NOERROR response but with zero results.

    So you have in fact determined that datafarm.net doesn't exist in
    (your) DNS, though perhaps not in the ideal way. There is still the
    issue that you queried your (?) resolver so the answer could be
    coming from cache.

    Your use of whois confirms that this domain is registered and like
    you I would expect all registered domains to create NS records in
    the parent zone. whois tells us that this domain's nameservers are:

    Name Server: ns1.mclink-net.it
    Name Server: ns2.mclink-net.it

    so in the .net zone I would expect NS records like this to exist:

    datafarm IN NS ns1.mclink-net.it.
    datafarm IN NS ns2.mclink-net.it.

    They don't though, which is puzzling to me. Perhaps there is a
    registrar option to not publish the zone until ready or something.
    Anyway, this can be verified by asking the nameservers that are
    authoritative for the .net zone:

    $ dig +short -t ns net.
    h.gtld-servers.net.
    k.gtld-servers.net.
    b.gtld-servers.net.
    c.gtld-servers.net.
    i.gtld-servers.net.
    m.gtld-servers.net.
    e.gtld-servers.net.
    g.gtld-servers.net.
    f.gtld-servers.net.
    j.gtld-servers.net.
    a.gtld-servers.net.
    d.gtld-servers.net.
    l.gtld-servers.net.

    Ask any of those by directing the query with '@':

    $ dig +norecurse -t ns datafarm.net @h.gtld-servers.net.

    ; <<>> DiG 9.16.50-Debian <<>> -t ns datafarm.net @h.gtld-servers.net.
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 25538
    ;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;datafarm.net. IN NS

    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
    net. 900 IN SOA a.gtld-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 1724083355 1800 900 604800 86400

    ;; Query time: 20 msec
    ;; SERVER: 2001:502:8cc::30#53(2001:502:8cc::30)
    ;; WHEN: Mon Aug 19 16:02:43 UTC 2024
    ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 114

    Note NXDOMAIN - so no name at all for "datafarm" exists within "net.". "aa" flag says that this is an authoritative answer (not froma cache) and "AUTHORITY SECTION" says what this server we queried is authoritative for, in this case "net." zone. So this is an authoritative answer from h.gtld-servers.net that no such name "datafarm" exists in "net.".

    Thanks,
    Andy

    --
    https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Smith@21:1/5 to Michael Grant on Mon Aug 19 21:30:02 2024
    Hi,

    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 12:46:43PM -0400, Michael Grant wrote:
    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 04:35:34PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
    TL;DR: I too find it a little odd that whois says this domain is reserved but
    querying the DNS shows that it isn't there at all as I would
    usually expect just the NS records to be present in the containing
    zone. I can only assume that this registrar allows for registered
    zones to not be published at all if one wishes. The whois is
    authoritative for what is available to register; the DNS is
    authoritative for what you can globally query.

    There is no obligation to provide a working name server or serve DNS for a domain name. DNS and name registration are separate.

    That's not what I'm talking about. When you register a domain you
    have to provide nameservers for it, and while it is true that you do
    not need to actually run nameserver software on those nameservers,
    the parent zone does need to add a delegation before anything will
    work.

    I find it odd that the parent zone (.net) has no delegation for this
    domain, but perhaps that is a registrar option that I have not
    noticed before. It has already been pointed out that if the
    intention is to use the domain internally then technically no
    delegation needs to be made. Though again I find it odd that the
    registrar bothers to say what the nameservers are in that case.

    Thanks,
    Andy

    Though there are some zone operators that actually check to see if
    your proposed nameservers answer correctly for the domain you're
    adding before they will add the delegation.

    --
    https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wesley@21:1/5 to Andy Smith on Tue Aug 20 01:10:02 2024
    On 2024-08-20 00:35, Andy Smith wrote:
    Hi,

    TL;DR: I too find it a little odd that whois says this domain is
    reserved but
    querying the DNS shows that it isn't there at all as I would
    usually expect just the NS records to be present in the containing
    zone. I can only assume that this registrar allows for registered
    zones to not be published at all if one wishes. The whois is
    authoritative for what is available to register; the DNS is
    authoritative for what you can globally query.

    On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote:
    This is the dns info from registry nameserver:

    In future it would help if you showed what actual query you are
    doing with "dig". From the output I can piece together that you did
    something like:

    $ dig datafarm.net

    or

    $ dig -t s datafarm.net

    but assuming that indeed is what you did, it does not actually "ask
    the registry nameserver".

    We can see from your output that you got a response from:

    ;; SERVER: 10.160.0.1#53(10.160.0.1)

    which is probably a resolver on your local network. So that answer
    you got may have been from cache.

    We can see from your output that you ended up (either implicitly or explicitly) asking for an A query:

    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;datafarm.net. IN A

    However the best record to use when trying to see if a domain exists
    i*in DNS* is an SOA ("Start of Authority"). It should show where the
    domain delegation happens. It's basically the details for the DNS
    zone.


    Andy

    The dig from com's nameservers got nxdomain as well. As you see here,

    $ dig datafarm.net @a.gtld-servers.net

    ; <<>> DiG 9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.1-Ubuntu <<>> datafarm.net @a.gtld-servers.net
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 45385
    ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
    ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;datafarm.net. IN A

    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
    net. 900 IN SOA a.gtld-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 1724107985
    1800 900 604800 86400

    ;; Query time: 7 msec
    ;; SERVER: 2001:503:a83e::2:30#53(a.gtld-servers.net) (UDP)
    ;; WHEN: Tue Aug 20 06:53:27 HKT 2024
    ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 114


    nxdomain means this domain (zone) not existing, whether it's A record or
    the zone itself. if the zone exists but lacks A record, the status
    should be 'NOERROR'.

    What confused me is that since domain is registered in the registrar,
    they should put a glue in com's nameservers. hence com nameserver would
    not return 'nxdomain' but a reference instead.

    BTW, I found there are many cases like the domain 'datafarm.net'. for
    example, 'netfirm.net' behaves the same.

    Thank you.

    --
    https://wespeng.pages.dev/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Smith@21:1/5 to Wesley on Tue Aug 20 01:20:01 2024
    Hi,

    On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 07:01:53AM +0800, Wesley wrote:
    The dig from com's nameservers got nxdomain as well. As you see here,

    You appear to have not read my email in full as everything you point
    out in your reply was already stated in my reply to you. Even the
    TL;DR: I put at the top, fearing that my email was too long, agrees
    with you.

    Thanks,
    Andy

    --
    https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)