• Re: Installing bookworm on an old HP laptop

    From basti@21:1/5 to Mick Ab on Mon Sep 9 13:00:01 2024
    Hello,

    i would use debian netinstall: https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ rather
    than download the whole DVD.

    Best regards


    On 09.09.24 12:08, Mick Ab wrote:
    I am interested in installing bookworm alongside the current Windows 7
    on an old HP ProBook 6570b laptop.

    I am thinking of downloading the first two DVDs of bookworm from one of
    the Debian mirror sites, then copying that to two DVD-R discs and
    installing bookworm those two discs.

    I think I have enough RAM and hard drive to accommodate bookworm, but I
    am not sure whether my laptop has the other hardware needed to run bookworm.

    Any advice on this matter would be much appreciated.

    Thanks.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George at Clug@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 9 13:30:02 2024
    On Monday, 09-09-2024 at 20:08 Mick Ab wrote:
    I am interested in installing bookworm alongside the current Windows 7 on
    an old HP ProBook 6570b laptop.

    I am thinking of downloading the first two DVDs of bookworm from one of the Debian mirror sites, then copying that to two DVD-R discs and installing bookworm those two discs.

    I think I have enough RAM and hard drive to accommodate bookworm, but I am not sure whether my laptop has the other hardware needed to run bookworm.

    Any advice on this matter would be much appreciated.

    1) I would try a Debian Live DVD. I have used the method to determine if my hardware is supported, not sure if it is a complete test, but should help.

    https://www.debian.org/CD/live/

    2) At times I have installed to a USB external disk drive, when my PC can boot from a USB drive. I would not suggest using this as a permanent solution as USB is slow, and if a memory disk, they are not build for lots of read/writes. But should work well
    as a test.

    3) A few people I know use ventoy to run and test various distributions: https://ventoy.net/en/index.html

    George.




    Thanks.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to Mick Ab on Mon Sep 9 13:20:01 2024
    On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 11:08:29 +0100
    Mick Ab <recoverymail123890@gmail.com> wrote:

    I am interested in installing bookworm alongside the current Windows
    7 on an old HP ProBook 6570b laptop.

    I am thinking of downloading the first two DVDs of bookworm from one
    of the Debian mirror sites, then copying that to two DVD-R discs and installing bookworm those two discs.

    I think I have enough RAM and hard drive to accommodate bookworm, but
    I am not sure whether my laptop has the other hardware needed to run bookworm.

    Any advice on this matter would be much appreciated.


    Shouldn't be a problem. I have one of these from 2009 running bookworm:

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Acer-Aspire-One-Netbook-Sapphire/dp/B001BZ920W

    The SSD is very slow, and there's not much room, but it does basic
    stuff fine, and it's very small and light.

    I'd agree with the other answer, the netinstall is the way to go,
    unless you have very slow or no Internet, and the fact that you are
    considering downloading DVDs suggests otherwise. With the netinstall
    you only download what you need, and it's already the latest version so
    there are no additional upgrades.

    The installer should handle making the dual boot and repartitioning the
    drive.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George at Clug@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 9 13:20:01 2024
    On Monday, 09-09-2024 at 20:28 basti wrote:
    Hello,

    i would use debian netinstall: https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ rather than download the whole DVD.

    I have often wondered that question myself.

    If you are doing a single installation and have access to the internet while doing the installation, I believe the netinstall CD makes more sense.

    If you do not have access to the Internet while doing the installation, I think the DVD makes more sense.

    Sometimes I download the DVD because, over time, I will install a number of times (for example, install a number of VMs to compare the various GUIs), but I have found that by the time I get to use the DVD, there are later minor versions out, hence quite
    a number of packages have been updated or upgrades since I did the download, such that I wonder if I would have been better off using the netinstall CD.

    Have I managed to confuse you with my own confusion? Sorry if I did, but my gut feel is that the netinstall CD makes the most sense if you have access to the Internet while doing the installation (unless your will be doing 20 or more installations on
    the same day you downloaded the DVD.

    George.


    Best regards


    On 09.09.24 12:08, Mick Ab wrote:
    I am interested in installing bookworm alongside the current Windows 7
    on an old HP ProBook 6570b laptop.

    I am thinking of downloading the first two DVDs of bookworm from one of the Debian mirror sites, then copying that to two DVD-R discs and installing bookworm those two discs.

    I think I have enough RAM and hard drive to accommodate bookworm, but I
    am not sure whether my laptop has the other hardware needed to run bookworm.

    Any advice on this matter would be much appreciated.

    Thanks.




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael =?utf-8?B?S2rDtnJsaW5n?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 9 14:50:02 2024
    On 9 Sep 2024 11:08 +0100, from recoverymail123890@gmail.com (Mick Ab):
    I think I have enough RAM and hard drive to accommodate bookworm, but I am not sure whether my laptop has the other hardware needed to run bookworm.

    I'm not familiar with your particular laptop, but if it runs Windows
    7, it should run Debian Bookworm well enough. A 15 years old laptop
    certainly won't be a high-performance system, but it should be usable.

    Unless you know that you want to install something from the second DVD
    during the initial installation, just the first one should be
    sufficient to get you up and running. Alternatively, as already
    mentioned, the netinst image to reduce the initial download size at
    the cost of needing to download the packages you actually _do_ install
    during the installation process.

    --
    Michael Kjörling 🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From basti@21:1/5 to George at Clug on Mon Sep 9 15:00:01 2024
    On 09.09.24 13:10, George at Clug wrote:
    Have I managed to confuse you with my own confusion? Sorry if I did,
    but my gut feel is that the netinstall CD makes the most sense if you
    have access to the Internet while doing the installation (unless your
    will be doing 20 or more installations on the same day you downloaded
    the DVD.

    George, than you can use a apt-proxy to minimize download size.

    Best Regards

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charles Curley@21:1/5 to George at Clug on Mon Sep 9 15:20:01 2024
    I concur with the netinst suggestions.

    On Mon, 09 Sep 2024 21:10:15 +1000
    George at Clug <Clug@goproject.info> wrote:

    Sometimes I download the DVD because, over time, I will install a
    number of times (for example, install a number of VMs to compare the
    various GUIs), but I have found that by the time I get to use the
    DVD, there are later minor versions out, hence quite a number of
    packages have been updated or upgrades since I did the download, such
    that I wonder if I would have been better off using the netinstall CD.

    To solve this problem, I use apt-proxy-ng on my firewall. It improves
    response times considerably once a package is in its cache.

    I also install auto-apt-proxy to automate finding proxies. Two
    thoughts, though.

    * If you use your own DNS server, have a CNAME apt-proxy for the
    caching machine.

    * The netinst installer, d-i, will let you use a local cache. Do so. But
    if you do, d-i adds a configuration line to /etc/apt/apt.conf to point
    to the proxy. This may interfere with auto-apt-proxy, so I remove it.

    --
    Does anybody read signatures any more?

    https://charlescurley.com
    https://charlescurley.com/blog/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tomas@tuxteam.de@21:1/5 to Charles Curley on Mon Sep 9 15:40:02 2024
    On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 07:17:37AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
    I concur with the netinst suggestions.

    On Mon, 09 Sep 2024 21:10:15 +1000
    George at Clug <Clug@goproject.info> wrote:

    Sometimes I download the DVD because, over time, I will install a
    number of times [...]

    To solve this problem, I use apt-proxy-ng on my firewall. It improves response times considerably once a package is in its cache.

    That would be apt-cacher-ng (or approx). That said -- yes, I do use apt-cacher-ng (especially when experimenting with VM installations
    and images for small things (RPis and their ilk).


    I also install auto-apt-proxy to automate finding proxies. Two
    thoughts, though.

    * If you use your own DNS server, have a CNAME apt-proxy for the
    caching machine.

    * The netinst installer, d-i, will let you use a local cache. Do so. But
    if you do, d-i adds a configuration line to /etc/apt/apt.conf to point
    to the proxy. This may interfere with auto-apt-proxy, so I remove it.

    I actually set the Acquire::http[s]::proxy thing in some /etc/apt/apt.conf.d file manually (and throw that away once done). For me, it turned out to be the most hassle-free option.

    Cheers
    --
    t

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZt741gAKCRAFyCz1etHa Roz6AJ9oB7+cXosVdgQl5i58eYnZCwLswgCfaPeCV/a5oKGEBuLEyETohHn3HC4=
    =6j+Y
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charles Curley@21:1/5 to tomas@tuxteam.de on Mon Sep 9 18:00:01 2024
    On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 15:32:19 +0200
    <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:

    On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 07:17:37AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
    I concur with the netinst suggestions.

    On Mon, 09 Sep 2024 21:10:15 +1000
    George at Clug <Clug@goproject.info> wrote:

    Sometimes I download the DVD because, over time, I will install a
    number of times [...]

    To solve this problem, I use apt-proxy-ng on my firewall. It
    improves response times considerably once a package is in its
    cache.

    That would be apt-cacher-ng (or approx).

    I sit corrected. Thank you.

    That said -- yes, I do use
    apt-cacher-ng (especially when experimenting with VM installations
    and images for small things (RPis and their ilk).


    I also install auto-apt-proxy to automate finding proxies. Two
    thoughts, though.

    * If you use your own DNS server, have a CNAME apt-proxy for the
    caching machine.

    * The netinst installer, d-i, will let you use a local cache. Do
    so. But if you do, d-i adds a configuration line to
    /etc/apt/apt.conf to point to the proxy. This may interfere with auto-apt-proxy, so I remove it.

    I actually set the Acquire::http[s]::proxy thing in some
    /etc/apt/apt.conf.d file manually (and throw that away once done).
    For me, it turned out to be the most hassle-free option.

    And that is how it should be done. Maybe d-i is in need of a bug
    report. I'll look into that.

    --
    Does anybody read signatures any more?

    https://charlescurley.com
    https://charlescurley.com/blog/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)