• Rephrased question -[Re: Understanding pdfseparate error messages]

    From Richard Owlett@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 24 19:50:01 2025
    Are pdfseparate error messages documented?
    If so, where?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wright@21:1/5 to Richard Owlett on Thu Jul 24 22:10:01 2025
    On Thu 24 Jul 2025 at 12:46:29 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
    Are pdfseparate error messages documented?
    If so, where?

    Have you tested poppler with trixie, because bookworm's is now
    three major versions behind.

    [Hopefully, this post won't languish at relay.mailchannels.net
    for four hours, unlike this morning's.]

    Cheers,
    David.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Owlett@21:1/5 to David Wright on Fri Jul 25 13:50:01 2025
    On 7/24/25 3:01 PM, David Wright wrote:
    On Thu 24 Jul 2025 at 12:46:29 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
    Are pdfseparate error messages documented?
    If so, where?

    Have you tested poppler with trixie, because bookworm's is now
    three major versions behind.


    Bookworm(Debian 12) is the current *major* version.
    [I'm running Debian 12.8 which is behind by three *point* releases.]

    Trixie(Debian 13) will be the next major version.
    It is still in testing and not yet in full freeze. [https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2025/07/msg00003.html]

    I won't install Trixie until a week or two after its full release.
    I would normally wait for a point release or two, but I had problem
    attempting to install pdftk. It is unclear if it was release level
    related a local hardware/software issue.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Owlett@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Walton on Fri Jul 25 14:00:02 2025
    On 7/24/25 4:15 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
    On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 4:54 PM Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> wrote:

    Are pdfseparate error messages documented?
    If so, where?


    I don't know about the "if", but the "where" would be < https://poppler.freedesktop.org/>.

    Jeff


    Not a particularly useful page except for the link to their mailing list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Smith@21:1/5 to Richard Owlett on Fri Jul 25 14:00:01 2025
    Hi,

    On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 06:41:16AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
    On 7/24/25 3:01 PM, David Wright wrote:
    Have you tested poppler with trixie, because bookworm's is now
    three major versions behind.

    Bookworm(Debian 12) is the current *major* version.

    Software in a stable distribution like Debian does not get updated
    during the life of the Debian release. That means that the version of
    Poppler (or anything else, with some rare exceptions) that is in Debian
    on the day of the bookworm release is the version that is always in
    bookworm for years to come.

    I think David is suggesting that Poppler in Debian 12 is now three major versions *of Poppler* behind.

    Thanks,
    Andy

    --
    https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Owlett@21:1/5 to Andy Smith on Fri Jul 25 14:20:01 2025
    On 7/25/25 6:58 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
    Hi,

    On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 06:41:16AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
    On 7/24/25 3:01 PM, David Wright wrote:
    Have you tested poppler with trixie, because bookworm's is now
    three major versions behind.

    Bookworm(Debian 12) is the current *major* version.

    Software in a stable distribution like Debian does not get updated
    during the life of the Debian release. That means that the version of
    Poppler (or anything else, with some rare exceptions) that is in Debian
    on the day of the bookworm release is the version that is always in
    bookworm for years to come.

    I think David is suggesting that Poppler in Debian 12 is now three major versions *of Poppler* behind.

    That makes sense, especially after looking at the subject lines of the
    last six months of the Poppler mailing list.

    After the dust settles from Trixie's pending release I should be able to install current version of pdftk and the Poppler packages.


    Thanks,
    Andy


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Owlett@21:1/5 to Max Nikulin on Fri Jul 25 14:40:01 2025
    On 7/24/25 9:06 PM, Max Nikulin wrote:
    On 24/07/2025 22:31, Richard Owlett wrote:
    On 7/24/25 8:20 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
    I tried "pdfseparate -f 116 -l 116 TFP2021.pdf dianostic.pdf" and got
    Syntax Error (3868069): Missing 'endstream' or incorrect stream length >>>> Syntax Error (3557294): Missing 'endstream' or incorrect stream length >>>>     [multiple repetitions of those 2 lines
    Syntax Error (3556857): Bad FCHECK in flate stream
    Syntax Error (3868069): Missing 'endstream' or incorrect stream length >>>> Syntax Error (3866517): Bad FCHECK in flate stream

    How/where do I find interpretation of those?
    [...]
    I'm still interested in the meaning of the error messages as it may
    hint as why ""pdftotext" wasn't *exactly* what I hoped for.


    On 25/07/2025 00:46, Richard Owlett wrote:
    Are pdfseparate error messages documented?
    If so, where?

    They are documented as poppler source code. Likely you should be
    familiar with PDF format specification to judge it if is failure of
    poppler or of those who created the file.


    I'm evidently not as aware of implications of PDF's graphical
    orientation even when dealing with text as I might wish.

    See David's message for a reason why it may be better to avoid
    pdfseparate. (It may still have its niche.)

    Noting the difference in reported file sizes of output of pdfseparate
    and pdftk, the later may be more appropriate for some of my future goals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nicolas George@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 26 11:10:01 2025
    Max Nikulin (HE12025-07-26):
    You may have testing or unstable as a virtual machine. Of course, it means using a search engine rather actively and perhaps some failures before you will manage to setup it.

    Why a VM? A chroot is quite enough to run a simple program from another
    Linux, with only the cost of loading other versions of shared libraries,
    saving the cost for the kernel and supporting daemons in the VM.

    It is also more convenient to interact with the files on the host
    system. And it is very easy to set up with Debian using debootstrap.

    Unpacking the packages in /usr/local and playing with symlinks and LD_LIBRARY_PATH is an even more convenient solution than a chroot, but
    it requires more know-how.

    Regards,

    --
    Nicolas George

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)