1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.PORTS.ARM

  • Help needed in reproducing FTBFS of eliom on armhf

    From =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_Glondu?=@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 28 15:40:01 2023
    Dear ARM porters,

    These days, eliom FTBFS on armhf buildds:

    https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=eliom

    I've given it back several times; the failure is consistent.

    However, I cannot reproduce it locally nor on a porterbox (abel).

    Looking at the log, a command-line flag is missing but I have no idea why.

    Can someone here have a look, please? At least, reproduce it outside of
    a buildd...


    Cheers,

    --
    Stéphane

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Emanuele Rocca@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 29 11:00:15 2023
    Hello Stéphane,

    On 2023-09-28 03:31, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
    These days, eliom FTBFS on armhf buildds:

    https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=eliom

    I've given it back several times; the failure is consistent.

    However, I cannot reproduce it locally nor on a porterbox (abel).

    I also cannot reproduce it in a armhf chroot.

    Looking at the log, a command-line flag is missing but I have no idea why.

    Right, the successful build passes the following to ocamlfind while the
    failed build on the buildd does not:

    -package js_of_ocaml-ppx

    Maybe try to figure out how the build system determines which flags to
    pass?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)