Following the tradition to keep up with upstream stable releases and
aiming to have a trixie close to upstream, this is to declare the
intention of uploading another linux version 6.12.26-1 to unstable
(planned 6.12.26-1, but might be 6.12.27-1 depending on progress in
next days)
linux/6.12.25-1 should migrate to testing in the next 2 days.
Debian Boot how is the timing with respect potential d-i work, an
ack/nack would be welcome to know if we should hold back the upload.
Hi Salvatore,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-05):
Following the tradition to keep up with upstream stable releases and
aiming to have a trixie close to upstream, this is to declare the
intention of uploading another linux version 6.12.26-1 to unstable
(planned 6.12.26-1, but might be 6.12.27-1 depending on progress in
next days)
linux/6.12.25-1 should migrate to testing in the next 2 days.
Debian Boot how is the timing with respect potential d-i work, an
ack/nack would be welcome to know if we should hold back the upload.
Current plan for me would be to try and converge to an RC 1 some time
next week. If 6.12.{26,27} are in unstable and better yet in testing
by then, that'd be fine by me.
Thanks, I have uploaded 6.1.27-1 to unstable and is now in the NEW
queue. I think we will not be able to make it in time to have it
migrated within the 10 days, but if we see there are no major
regression we can ask release team to migrate it earlier if this d-i
release would approach.
That said, the upload does not contain the fix for #1104669 which was
now queued upstream (and so will be in the next upload).
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-06):
Thanks, I have uploaded 6.1.27-1 to unstable and is now in the NEW
queue. I think we will not be able to make it in time to have it
migrated within the 10 days, but if we see there are no major
regression we can ask release team to migrate it earlier if this d-i release would approach.
Yeah, that looks very sensible to me, and very much in line with past practices. I don't remember anyone wanting to get that changed.
That said, the upload does not contain the fix for #1104669 which was
now queued upstream (and so will be in the next upload).
That particular one seems to be more in the “log noise” category than an actual problem, but I only skimmed through it. In any case, if you want
or need to perform a follow-up upload soon-ish to address more issues,
that would still work for me at this point.
Hi Salvatore,
(ftp team dropped)
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-06):
Thanks, I have uploaded 6.1.27-1 to unstable and is now in the NEW
queue. I think we will not be able to make it in time to have it
migrated within the 10 days, but if we see there are no major
regression we can ask release team to migrate it earlier if this d-i release would approach.
After just a quick look, linux* seem rather OK to me. Are you happy with their state (from the kernel team point of view) and with their possibly getting into testing as they are, in a matter of hours?
Thanks, I have uploaded 6.1.27-1 to unstable and is now in the NEW
queue. I think we will not be able to make it in time to have it
migrated within the 10 days, but if we see there are no major
regression we can ask release team to migrate it earlier if this d-i
release would approach.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 04:59:01 |
Calls: | 10,387 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,061 |
Messages: | 6,416,796 |