• Uploading linux (6.12.26-1)

    From Salvatore Bonaccorso@1:229/2 to All on Mon May 5 00:10:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.boot
    From: carnil@debian.org

    Hi

    Following the tradition to keep up with upstream stable releases and
    aiming to have a trixie close to upstream, this is to declare the
    intention of uploading another linux version 6.12.26-1 to unstable
    (planned 6.12.26-1, but might be 6.12.27-1 depending on progress in
    next days)

    linux/6.12.25-1 should migrate to testing in the next 2 days.

    Debian Boot how is the timing with respect potential d-i work, an
    ack/nack would be welcome to know if we should hold back the upload.

    The new version imports stable seriies version to 6.12.26.

    A couple of (already assigned) CVEs from the Linux kernel CNA will be
    fixed (more to follow).

    some packaging changes are included, so far they are:

    * drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88: Enable RTW88_8723DS as module
    (Closes: #1104529)

    adding specific hardware support.

    * Revert "rndis_host: Flag RNDIS modems as WWAN devices" (Closes: #1104511)

    which fixes a regression with USB tethering.

    * lintian: Override some false positives:
    - linux-headers: Override another error and warning for vmlinux
    - [riscv64] linux-image-dbg: Override shared-library-lacks-stack-section
    for vdso.so
    - [arm64] linux-perf: Override statically-linked-binary for asm_pure_loop
    * [ppc64*] linux-image: Fix version in NEWS entry
    * linux-source: Suggest pkgconf, not the obsolete pkg-config
    * linux-image-dbg: lintian: Drop mismatched override for
    wrong-section-according-to-package-name
    * [amd64] linux-image-cloud-amd64-dbg: lintian: Drop overrides for vdsox32.so
    * d/copyright: Replace old FSF addresses with current GNU license URL
    * d/rules.real: Exclude vDSOs from processing by dh_makeshlibs
    * linux-doc: Use dh_sphinxdoc to replace embedded Javascript

    Fixes for problems reported by lintian.

    * [arm64] udeb: Add mtk-cmdq-mailbox to kernel-image

    Making sure that mtk-cmdq-mailbox will be present in the udebs.

    Regards,
    Salvatore

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQKTBAABCgB9FiEERkRAmAjBceBVMd3uBUy48xNDz0QFAmgX5Q9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDQ2 NDQ0MDk4MDhDMTcxRTA1NTMxRERFRTA1NENCOEYzMTM0M0NGNDQACgkQBUy48xND z0Qu7BAAlZ7ODFuAKCi2qxNkTf/WhNrmkerfMU80qIy8w55kHVKyB917md3mjc+x /XvYoKQZRjOJRpNzv1XlPiRfWqrULp8mKEeQ0H2KwAfoZ64Q1mhs8BySIhu2mAzM vdoDwyS4vbx2S+QNsD1PWOREQbUkDZfHX2OmAKSuc49cqglSu9+5BzIxo7zTvKry H6DspRFyWePrzx7b1XvXI5vexXRc9G9YHpZ9Asq38nrk7XJS6vo64ayTAeOWeUxd vkeQyrRi38XOuvSYfOV4CAFFC7Kf/XsabOJq4kmnuaR6B578v4qSiupwHOjmzLjz QVeD2uurqRJnrU7rF60BavT7WI2TE63g705crRBKSKfrFASlXQrtF4YS5KyFE1Za T2wjERtc2jIvZFxEVJkwK1RY99eBTI9limM8jiL4AkjFhZHYJKKd9fbdqS0aWZMp ry7fPlYS8CpZqnmzE6HVu0PlXG/kuZl8CEQ17BoRBNHQzoKtgo8Pjr7TxIquIrRB bJSrFlQc+SMjf189gppWuSThjmgguqaubaaz7ITjJZtuJIUgPe1fNk56RQ1Dr2Sf IfXUN5en3bst1pnweNT0Y8ZAHQFjXnjQUhwEL94oXvbJb+ImjoYdG9YGbsuB0EIY rXGOCAnpQy2bKZzuLLyFNR76a8rFrP114B5Pc6FobZKKWn18xvY=
    =95bb
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
  • From Cyril Brulebois@1:229/2 to All on Tue May 6 01:30:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.boot
    From: kibi@debian.org

    Hi Salvatore,

    Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-05):
    Following the tradition to keep up with upstream stable releases and
    aiming to have a trixie close to upstream, this is to declare the
    intention of uploading another linux version 6.12.26-1 to unstable
    (planned 6.12.26-1, but might be 6.12.27-1 depending on progress in
    next days)

    linux/6.12.25-1 should migrate to testing in the next 2 days.

    Debian Boot how is the timing with respect potential d-i work, an
    ack/nack would be welcome to know if we should hold back the upload.

    Current plan for me would be to try and converge to an RC 1 some time
    next week. If 6.12.{26,27} are in unstable and better yet in testing
    by then, that'd be fine by me.


    Cheers,
    --
    Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
    D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmgZSZcACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSAONQ/+JQYLoulw3CdEtryb4n3T/8Teuhr0KZ3Xpj0WMkz13FCPic+gN943p2vZ 8BwTgTPm+D4ZVqQu8VI15roSzH+GBvh5Oeib00/eLIrMRxHoMWEuK0tzKSg1NKnH QeurS0q8RH3e3w3cTOYeO5RihLd1/OgPjH0ml6kfK8sWComOCEJ8C8V8RHNniCAQ TrodqMXnLtFGj4OJjG/mLs4mNxJ0PaKGZmG8smaVYsZdfZMF8xG0FPSt99dqbrAN KlNIYJC0sSCYPbFjlGo9xclg1sK+eZ3JraF5ckW3/nFTPe+24FBHJqUMMrGWCnuE ZxOr4dK8LD5XTGeZxPws2Ubnw/nnzTPQ2SxD+t74vY6oKBNjQzuVHYsUFNCyVcOi hYAHPLLGpvPz7xwKqqW7S7E1gTdLvTiINTZkwbS1Nwjp+duwo1qRCV0XvUhG1yyl MKwAsWZSbQEwCAIMayyemsbsVClsHZduiBTEIk+rZqf1Bvib7viG/LeSA/c5SiBf qhVpxP7pPxmO8n8Lb5ofIOwNCcwUzdk5LpffJtFelSitpwMRLnIwrZNzZr7Lk4Hd 7Hlg9PVk8yQ9HcrMhbMduFSjnqhRI8gS5wP3DSNwHu35ZH8ce2lvVk6H0WoeOB2F I9nFrWgkhsZ5mZR5b4LfeoAO5u8j8X83COxskPfBpisovmo0U3Y=
    =QXEa
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    *
  • From Salvatore Bonaccorso@1:229/2 to Cyril Brulebois on Tue May 6 22:10:02 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.boot
    From: carnil@debian.org

    Hi Cyril,

    On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:28:23AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
    Hi Salvatore,

    Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-05):
    Following the tradition to keep up with upstream stable releases and
    aiming to have a trixie close to upstream, this is to declare the
    intention of uploading another linux version 6.12.26-1 to unstable
    (planned 6.12.26-1, but might be 6.12.27-1 depending on progress in
    next days)

    linux/6.12.25-1 should migrate to testing in the next 2 days.

    Debian Boot how is the timing with respect potential d-i work, an
    ack/nack would be welcome to know if we should hold back the upload.

    Current plan for me would be to try and converge to an RC 1 some time
    next week. If 6.12.{26,27} are in unstable and better yet in testing
    by then, that'd be fine by me.

    Thanks, I have uploaded 6.1.27-1 to unstable and is now in the NEW
    queue. I think we will not be able to make it in time to have it
    migrated within the 10 days, but if we see there are no major
    regression we can ask release team to migrate it earlier if this d-i
    release would approach.

    That said, the upload does not contain the fix for #1104669 which was
    now queued upstream (and so will be in the next upload).

    Regards,
    Salvatore

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
  • From Cyril Brulebois@1:229/2 to All on Tue May 6 23:30:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.boot
    From: kibi@debian.org

    Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-06):
    Thanks, I have uploaded 6.1.27-1 to unstable and is now in the NEW
    queue. I think we will not be able to make it in time to have it
    migrated within the 10 days, but if we see there are no major
    regression we can ask release team to migrate it earlier if this d-i
    release would approach.

    Yeah, that looks very sensible to me, and very much in line with past practices. I don't remember anyone wanting to get that changed.

    That said, the upload does not contain the fix for #1104669 which was
    now queued upstream (and so will be in the next upload).

    That particular one seems to be more in the “log noise” category than an actual problem, but I only skimmed through it. In any case, if you want
    or need to perform a follow-up upload soon-ish to address more issues,
    that would still work for me at this point.


    Cheers,
    --
    Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
    D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmgafo4ACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSDYbhAAwAzS9jjd/j+ivtGPrTBwlv+PpzggI1auoOtJ9T0ythj7q9+STHeGro1B 8QAXbdpBMtgHYLpIkyUrFABkkUTJfMA7ea65iledirGWvdDVEbpHHsb4u9lhWJAx UGCIBr9x8eui6CShoRnXd2JBL2uWdsmlO+YtWumiI2/qjDFcmVM1tK4NQc+GGMX6 QZa9O4wT2YdrsuUZVcsLmvK76g+NIvreNoh6kevaYvLMxs4oEElOvAUXLymtCuZW /9YIKG4kJ4v7V9S0m+161PZXLMqupnh9lAnXc1sWYvpw7z7INWdsYARWVzeTpVvg 6rehBgW3PV4kKBKv+u6h5RZmsYANR6hPxOHCM1hRSeFql5nbMneS0O5hKsZYZ2nl Xyak78GfKT1tbllcPaO8ugSgpY+8OkeMNB+2Uiux9PRehyfIOJTPhJh2Vp/j6iDX cnHr2p8pNm4ab2fgLuXRjnoH8IF2hSMizX51se3hUw84Xcf65APaNp3Rk0J4ZE/4 2yO3ldKvJHyZlUrnFj3VcQMm1uULkHTDe91eJc+77lZNGKqZntt5yuhDHZjg9gLn 86MNO95xhCg1VMpxcqYspv0piJi9xDubKGS53mjvW7JdvQrxIy+cv+6+1E2xS2Uh VMO4jYBbyjeNvfOh1FO2wv+UzPCFD7aItpsA0D62fK3Gi0FWfBg=
    =gJJy
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    *
  • From Salvatore Bonaccorso@1:229/2 to Cyril Brulebois on Wed May 7 07:30:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.boot
    From: carnil@debian.org

    Hi Cyril,

    On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
    Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-06):
    Thanks, I have uploaded 6.1.27-1 to unstable and is now in the NEW
    queue. I think we will not be able to make it in time to have it
    migrated within the 10 days, but if we see there are no major
    regression we can ask release team to migrate it earlier if this d-i release would approach.

    Yeah, that looks very sensible to me, and very much in line with past practices. I don't remember anyone wanting to get that changed.

    Ack.

    That said, the upload does not contain the fix for #1104669 which was
    now queued upstream (and so will be in the next upload).

    That particular one seems to be more in the “log noise” category than an actual problem, but I only skimmed through it. In any case, if you want
    or need to perform a follow-up upload soon-ish to address more issues,
    that would still work for me at this point.

    No that is not urgent, I just wanted to mention it as I somehow raced
    with upstream queuing the fix and me finishing the upload. Don't think
    that we will need a folloup specifically for that one.

    Thanks for your followup!

    Regards,
    Salvatore

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
  • From Salvatore Bonaccorso@1:229/2 to Cyril Brulebois on Mon May 12 21:10:02 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.boot
    From: carnil@debian.org

    Hi Cyril,

    On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 08:02:50PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
    Hi Salvatore,

    (ftp team dropped)

    Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-06):
    Thanks, I have uploaded 6.1.27-1 to unstable and is now in the NEW
    queue. I think we will not be able to make it in time to have it
    migrated within the 10 days, but if we see there are no major
    regression we can ask release team to migrate it earlier if this d-i release would approach.

    After just a quick look, linux* seem rather OK to me. Are you happy with their state (from the kernel team point of view) and with their possibly getting into testing as they are, in a matter of hours?

    Yes this is fine, we have not heard of major regressions/issues with
    the current version and it should be okay to migrated earlier to
    testing.

    Thank you!

    After the d-i release I will continue with another round of stable
    update.

    Regards,
    Salvatore

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
  • From Cyril Brulebois@1:229/2 to All on Mon May 12 20:10:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.boot
    From: kibi@debian.org

    Hi Salvatore,

    (ftp team dropped)

    Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-06):
    Thanks, I have uploaded 6.1.27-1 to unstable and is now in the NEW
    queue. I think we will not be able to make it in time to have it
    migrated within the 10 days, but if we see there are no major
    regression we can ask release team to migrate it earlier if this d-i
    release would approach.

    After just a quick look, linux* seem rather OK to me. Are you happy with
    their state (from the kernel team point of view) and with their possibly getting into testing as they are, in a matter of hours?


    Cheers,
    --
    Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
    D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmgiN8oACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSCrhQ/9FNCsDxLa+k+AdSc5Qku34hfDLcxse25KZcAzoqgXkfdRSg20qNVJ9lge RHBFAIHXbwI6L9pP6SCpdV+KEqge7Flv+QnP0qPcbS0K3dem13FSAu/Ue2il3VNu UAf5vyICtvXU3V2SIcd8rLbGT5Y72d+tyG3LsoOQ36T2OzwNcrXivyPoT3uVnjNM ZzP8hSQ6VF/Zi2oJVjnxH2dyLUP0g4LYQBjFEDczbiCi8guhbSrlYGFryMDsq03V i7ihVUFno/SLErriLXANnrdxJ4S2ePWJypJ4AXIOn/thulug0SZP9sC68fqOzrHF XIcx88gclOOWe9BZSqt8hYtwwR8qfjKUTWh3WoazxDWrrm3eVyI2nQ1/RE/vlnw1 gqUWDvjBlnE3TL3a+ZjWgsmUmdVRQ9o7/e9xBoocs7V5xvr/L9g7x21/OZIUVTj8 8latCQkghCciKjed4urSTmgwJ5LcnnsEkkZ9vNAcLIRC0Yt8EZvS+cL2PTm00peI e6MYICooEDqEAcwC4DNpTOI1xWJPLa9aE87coVRaDS9QsLaKyb36n508oFwXaYXj etWJXG4MoFhiSr83ZtgXcPEfV7CMGomKvjJFipOE6783jnCbAQGAk8SIZNzPRqTm FbYpniZav3Zt/mgZZdq6f0ekjdq6z9Ay6mfBawt4c8S+zp+Qx6M=
    =i/U7
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    *