• Moving iw under the kernel team

    From Paride Legovini@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 18 20:30:01 2022
    [Following-up from IRC conversation]

    Hi Kernel Team,

    I'm the maintainer of iw, which currently has me as the only Maintainer,
    and packaging is hosted under debian/ on salsa. I think it would be
    better to have the package maintained by the kernel team (with me as an Uploader), and hosted under kernel-team/ on salsa.

    To be clear: I want to keep maintaining the package, but given that it's
    widely used I think it's better to allow non-NMU uploads from a relevant
    team (iw upstream is on kernel.org).

    The feedback I've got on IRC is positive, but I'd like to get a +1 on
    the mailing list, so there's a record of the decision. Are you happy
    with the move? If the answer is positive I'll request salsa access, open
    a salsa ticket to move the project and update d/control.

    (This case is almost identical to what happened with iproute2 [1].)

    Thanks,

    Paride

    [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2022/04/msg00002.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paride Legovini@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 1 14:40:01 2022
    Hi Kernel Team,

    I'm the maintainer of iw, which currently has me as the only Maintainer,
    and packaging is hosted under debian/ on salsa. I think it would be
    better to have the package maintained by the kernel team (with me as an Uploader), and hosted under kernel-team/ on salsa.

    To be clear: I want to keep maintaining the package, but given that it's widely used I think it's better to allow non-NMU uploads from a relevant
    team (iw upstream is on kernel.org).

    The feedback I've got on IRC is positive, but I'd like to get a +1 on
    the mailing list, so there's a record of the decision. Are you happy
    with the move? If the answer is positive I'll request salsa access, open
    a salsa ticket to move the project and update d/control.

    (This case is almost identical to what happened with iproute2 [1].)

    Thanks,

    Paride

    [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2022/04/msg00002.html

    Hi again,

    I just noticed that iw 5.19 is out and I'd like to package it. Looks
    like a good occasion to move the repo under the kernel team.

    I'm totally fine with a NACK, but it would be a pity to skip what I
    believe is an improvement because my previous email drowned in automated
    mail, which I have the impression is what happened.

    Cc: Ben Hutchings, as he gave a +1 to the iproute2 proposal [1].

    Cheers,

    Paride

    [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2022/04/msg00065.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Hutchings@21:1/5 to Paride Legovini on Thu Jun 2 19:00:01 2022
    On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 14:11 +0200, Paride Legovini wrote:
    Hi Kernel Team,

    I'm the maintainer of iw, which currently has me as the only Maintainer, and packaging is hosted under debian/ on salsa. I think it would be
    better to have the package maintained by the kernel team (with me as an Uploader), and hosted under kernel-team/ on salsa.

    To be clear: I want to keep maintaining the package, but given that it's widely used I think it's better to allow non-NMU uploads from a relevant team (iw upstream is on kernel.org).

    The feedback I've got on IRC is positive, but I'd like to get a +1 on
    the mailing list, so there's a record of the decision. Are you happy
    with the move? If the answer is positive I'll request salsa access, open
    a salsa ticket to move the project and update d/control.

    (This case is almost identical to what happened with iproute2 [1].)

    Thanks,

    Paride

    [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2022/04/msg00002.html

    Hi again,

    I just noticed that iw 5.19 is out and I'd like to package it. Looks
    like a good occasion to move the repo under the kernel team.

    I'm totally fine with a NACK, but it would be a pity to skip what I
    believe is an improvement because my previous email drowned in
    automated
    mail, which I have the impression is what happened.

    Cc: Ben Hutchings, as he gave a +1 to the iproute2 proposal [1].

    I'd be happy to accept iw into team maintenance, if there are no
    objections.

    Our package repositories generally have CI enabled, so I've just opened
    a merge request to do that for iw.

    Ben.

    --
    Ben Hutchings
    Humour is the best antidote to reality.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmKY7BgACgkQ57/I7JWG EQkNVBAAkyicdfYZoxwHyREIXKKLDRr0oECJWdC4IUd4T8pGLz2uZWRE/LjzMruX EOf6V7puUjOZa01ffQvA48DNt0pt2tEN7t+yJLnzGoewP8i2KsAY0eWf4GpfbN1U R2GTO5U72lmn2+wCMUNO5Gj2dobE2dPSilaHswAVg1EtbFgR/0BsmkLxsy7VEU67 gHK79VcVoiYFsz310ZvEbFZSsW2wB2Byp9WAySqyosv9mIdHCdZz6OCZbNdm2ini HNGK+yrgyqxwSkl7HsfF2QJat33PNaACBSdsY07pUtfnfAqwgmLV/o1fSzOZp060 VG3trMltvFqYTvppPboamEDpgGJ98acX87pQ7sIwW/MFfhkd0DciYv/6Tuh1Bg7T DztWg422rG78NV4EL8Gk3DwYQkujCM7SWXCofgnVGV+NYYGYNTJneobCxqDj/uvo kxBj4/prZ4bO3W+8WzJwCN2hZdW0sqEl8G/31IoXOrOUwusk/Bh5u+Vv7KrYO8vl Ivi5s+bdhJEQz6IH0VnwkQRPLw8TwF7HIFX/b9DFbCZtgaULMNLP72mdUdjJ9fRr smUxHyxoQD/5B3BgGz/z97v6XojLhw7GgtCoSEQxrYzwF5+DOycYqwI7AZZhsEfI cLb8/VOBZZ5f5M3hOSlHdX5LPZjfKcvFyxgN8Tefka+hvY6FdNM=
    =ZcAD
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paride Legovini@21:1/5 to Ben Hutchings on Wed Jun 8 15:10:01 2022
    Ben Hutchings wrote on 02/06/2022:
    On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 14:11 +0200, Paride Legovini wrote:
    Hi Kernel Team,

    I'm the maintainer of iw, which currently has me as the only Maintainer, >>> and packaging is hosted under debian/ on salsa. I think it would be
    better to have the package maintained by the kernel team (with me as an
    Uploader), and hosted under kernel-team/ on salsa.

    To be clear: I want to keep maintaining the package, but given that it's >>> widely used I think it's better to allow non-NMU uploads from a relevant >>> team (iw upstream is on kernel.org).

    The feedback I've got on IRC is positive, but I'd like to get a +1 on
    the mailing list, so there's a record of the decision. Are you happy
    with the move? If the answer is positive I'll request salsa access, open >>> a salsa ticket to move the project and update d/control.

    (This case is almost identical to what happened with iproute2 [1].)

    Thanks,

    Paride

    [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2022/04/msg00002.html

    Hi again,

    I just noticed that iw 5.19 is out and I'd like to package it. Looks
    like a good occasion to move the repo under the kernel team.

    I'm totally fine with a NACK, but it would be a pity to skip what I
    believe is an improvement because my previous email drowned in
    automated
    mail, which I have the impression is what happened.

    Cc: Ben Hutchings, as he gave a +1 to the iproute2 proposal [1].

    I'd be happy to accept iw into team maintenance, if there are no
    objections.

    Thanks Ben. As nobody objected in about one week I filed a salsa support
    ticket requesting a repository move:

    https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/300

    The next iw upload will have the Kernel Team as Maintainer and me as
    Uploader.

    Our package repositories generally have CI enabled, so I've just opened
    a merge request to do that for iw.

    It's merged and working fine, thanks.

    Paride

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)