Hi

Please get a name, "whoami" is none. Please use your company or
affiliation provided email address if you want to communicate for them.

On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 02:47:31AM +0800, whoami wrote:

We believe this approach would benefit both our internal development
workflow and Debian users who may use our hardware. Please let us know
if this is something Debian would consider.

Our normal policy is: patches needs to be in
- linus tree,
- linux-next, or
- similar.

We talked about this and came to the conclusion that we can not accept especially larger in development patch sets for inclusion into the main
Debian kernel. So no, we won't consider doing that.

Thank you for your time and consideration. We greatly appreciate the
work the Debian community does and would be happy to collaborate
further to ensure smooth integration.

What we might be able to do give you guidance how to build your own
kernels semi-automatically using the existing tooling the Debian kernel provides.

Bastian

--
Without facts, the decision cannot be made logically. You must rely on
your human intuition.
-- Spock, "Assignment: Earth", stardate unknown

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)