My thought is unless some serious deficiency is present in
app-office/sc-im it should be moved to Gentoo's main ebuild repository
and the last rites process should be started for app-office/sc. Does
anyone else have thoughts or comments on this?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 11:24 PM Jeff Gazso <jeff.gazso@gmail.com> wrote:
My thought is unless some serious deficiency is present in
app-office/sc-im it should be moved to Gentoo's main ebuild repository
and the last rites process should be started for app-office/sc. Does
anyone else have thoughts or comments on this?
We could probably last rite app-office/sc. It has no maintainer, and a
couple of open bugs.
Moving app-office/sc-im to the Gentoo repo is a bit more of an ask.
Ideally, a Gentoo developer would maintain it. Alternatively, a
non-developer could maintain it by proxy, but you would need to find a developer to act as proxy or get approval from the Proxy Maintainers
project. In any case, you should probably reach out to the current
maintainer in GURU to see what he wants to do.
On 22/06/27 10:59AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 11:24 PM Jeff Gazso <jeff.gazso@gmail.com> wrote:
My thought is unless some serious deficiency is present in
app-office/sc-im it should be moved to Gentoo's main ebuild repository
and the last rites process should be started for app-office/sc. Does
anyone else have thoughts or comments on this?
We could probably last rite app-office/sc. It has no maintainer, and a
couple of open bugs.
Moving app-office/sc-im to the Gentoo repo is a bit more of an ask.
Ideally, a Gentoo developer would maintain it. Alternatively, a
non-developer could maintain it by proxy, but you would need to find a
developer to act as proxy or get approval from the Proxy Maintainers
project. In any case, you should probably reach out to the current
maintainer in GURU to see what he wants to do.
I'm the maintainer of app-office/sc-im. Just so everyone is aware, upon >talking to Jeff, I've decided to maintain it by proxy. I have some reading >to do but hopefully I'll have created the necessary pull requests by >tomorrow.
I do have just one question: Should I wait until the pull requests are >merged to remove sc-im from GURU or should I do it after I create the pull >requests?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 491 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 128:25:00 |
Calls: | 9,688 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 13,728 |
Messages: | 6,177,352 |