0BSD is on the list of GPL-Compatible licenses as per
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
I ran into this license missing from the group recently when trying to deploy a mostly
@FSF-APPROVED -only system.
---
profiles/license_groups | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/profiles/license_groups b/profiles/license_groups
index 6d85ab5798c3..c0976a22a54a 100644
--- a/profiles/license_groups
+++ b/profiles/license_groups
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
#
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
# GPL or LGPL with various exceptions are also included here, because
# they are more permissive than the licenses they are based on. -GPL-COMPATIBLE AGPL-3 AGPL-3+ Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0-with-LLVM-exceptions Artistic-2 Boost-1.0 BSD BSD-2 CC0-1.0 CeCILL-2 Clarified-Artistic Clear-BSD ECL-2.0 FSFAP FTL gcc-runtime-library-exception-3.1 GPL-1 GPL-1+ GPL-2 GPL-2+ GPL-2+-with-eCos-
exception-2 GPL-2+-with-font-exception GPL-2+-with-openssl-exception GPL-2+-with-Pyinstaller-Bootloader-exception GPL-2-with-classpath-exception GPL-2-with-font-exception GPL-2-with-linking-exception GPL-2-with-MySQL-FLOSS-exception GPL-3 GPL-3+ GPL-3+-
with-autoconf-exception GPL-3+-with-font-exception GPL-3+-