I've been packaging some Gemini protocol servers and clients in ::guru overlay, and they all go to net-misc category. I think it would be
better to split browsers and servers for non-www protocols (like Finger, Ident, Gemini and Gopher) into separate categories.
I think we need a more precise definition if we do not want this.
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, Jonas Stein wrote:
I've been packaging some Gemini protocol servers and clients in ::guru
overlay, and they all go to net-misc category. I think it would be
better to split browsers and servers for non-www protocols (like Finger,
Ident, Gemini and Gopher) into separate categories.
all servers without www servers means, we should move
ssh, imap, pop, mysql... there too
I think we need a more precise definition if we do not want this.
On 2021-12-20 01:18, Jonas Stein wrote:
I think we need a more precise definition if we do not want this.
"servers for miscellaneous application-level network protocols"?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 51:36:33 |
Calls: | 10,397 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 14,067 |
Messages: | 6,417,338 |
Posted today: | 1 |