XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.fan.states.iowa, sac.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
Abill signed into law by Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday makes it a state
crime for a person to be in Iowa if previously denied admission to or
removed from the United States.
The law, which takes effect July 1, has elevated anxiety in Iowa's
immigrant communities and has prompted questions among legal experts and
law enforcement on how it will be enforced. It mirrors part of a Texas law
that is currently blocked in court.
In Iowa and across the country, Republican leaders have accused President
Biden of neglecting his responsibilities to enforce federal immigration
law, leading Republican governors to send troops to Texas and legislatures
to propose a variety of state-level strategies.
“The Biden Administration has failed to enforce our nation’s immigration
laws, putting the protection and safety of Iowans at risk,” Reynolds said
in a statement after signing the bill. “This bill gives Iowa law
enforcement the power to do what he is unwilling to do: enforce
immigration laws already on the books.”
After the Legislature passed the bill, Des Moines Police Chief Dana
Wingert told the Associated Press in an email in March that immigration
status does not factor into the department’s work to keep the community
safe. He said the force is “not equipped, funded or staffed" to take on responsibilities that are the federal government's.
“Simply stated, not only do we not have the resources to assume this
additional task, we don’t even have the ability to perform this function,” Wingert said.
Shawn Ireland, president of the Iowa State Sheriffs and Deputies Assn. and
a deputy sheriff in Linn County, also said in a March email that law enforcement officials would have to consult with county attorneys for
guidance on implementation and enforcement.
The Iowa legislation, like the Texas law, could mean criminal charges for people who have outstanding deportation orders or who have previously been removed from or denied admission to the U.S. Once in custody, migrants
could either agree to a judge’s order to leave the U.S. or be prosecuted.
The judge’s order must identify the transportation method for leaving the
U.S. and a law enforcement officer or Iowa agency to monitor migrants’ departures. Those who don’t leave could face rearrest under more serious charges.
The Texas law is stalled in court after a challenge from the U.S.
Department of Justice that says it conflicts with the federal government’s immigration authority.
The bill in Iowa faces the same questions of implementation and
enforcement as the Texas law, since deportation is a “complicated,
expensive and often dangerous” federal process, said immigration law
expert Huyen Pham of Texas A&M School of Law.
In the meantime, Iowa’s immigrant community groups are organizing
informational meetings and materials to try to answer people’s questions. They’re also asking local and county law enforcement agencies for official statements, as well as face-to-face meetings.
At one community meeting in Des Moines, 80 people gathered and asked
questions in Spanish, including: “Should I leave Iowa?”
Others asked: “Is it safe to call the police?” “Can Iowa police ask me
about my immigration status?” And: “What happens if I’m racially
profiled?”
Fingerhut writes for the Associated Press.
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-04-10/iowa-governor-signs- bill-that-gives-state-authority-to-arrest-and-deport-some-migrants
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)