'Tucker Carlson Interview Arguing The United States ‘Should Have Sided
With Hitler’ Garners Millions Of Views'
<https://harbingersdaily.com/tucker-carlson-interview-arguing-the-united-states-should-have-sided-with-hitler-garners-millions-of-views/>
'Through the use of false accusations, misleading information, and antisemitic conspiracies, Tucker Carlson’s Podcast is being used as a
tool to deceive.
While Carlson’s newfound disdain for the Jewish State has disgraced him
in the eyes of many conservatives and Christians, millions of his
followers remain, happily consuming content crafted to stoke public
opinion against Israel and the Jewish people as a whole.
Carlson’s latest podcast interview featured Professor David Collum from Cornell University. The episode surrounded multiple topics before
veering toward an outlandish discussion about the Second World War and
why the United States “should have sided with Hitler.”
In the interview, Collum began by insisting that the population’s information surrounding World War II “is all wrong,” to which Carlson promptly agreed.
“One can make the argument we should have sided with Hitler and fought Stalin,” Collum asserted, twisting a remark from U.S. General George S. Patton about the threat of the Soviet Union to bolster his claim.
Collum credited a book authored by Diana West for opening his eyes to
World War II “revisionist history.” However, the author was less than pleased to be lumped into the discussion. Following the interview, West
took to social media to publicly refute the idea that her book advocates
for “aligning with Hitler.”
‘Maybe There Wouldn’t Have Been A Holocaust’
Collum, speaking with Carlson, also bizarrely claimed that if America
had aligned itself with the Nazi Regime, “maybe there wouldn’t have been a holocaust.”
Carlson nodded along, failing to mention that the United States entered
World War II in December of 1941, when Hitler was already years into his bloody campaign against Jews and had constructed concentration camps to
carry out their mass execution.
How an alliance between Hitler and the United States would have ended
the Nazi leaders’ antisemitic ambitions was not explained in the
interview, nor questioned by Carlson.
One month after the United States joined the war, Hitler and his men
planned the “final solution to the Jewish question,” intending to systematically exterminate all European Jews. Hatred of Jews was deeply ingrained in the Nazi platform since its inception, resulting in the
deaths of six million Jews before Germany surrendered in 1945. According
to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Hitler’s first written statement on the “Jewish Question” was in 1919, where he defined his “ultimate goal” to be “the removal of the Jews altogether.”
The elimination of Jews was not a tertiary issue for Hitler, which the
right alliance could have restrained. Collum’s statements downplay the wickedness of Nazi Germany and seek to establish common ground between America and the goals of Adolf Hitler.
Darryl Cooper
To understand Collum’s flawed argument, it is helpful to venture back to September of 2024, when Carlson conducted an interview with Holocaust revisionist Darryl Cooper.
Cooper similarly insisted that the primary goal of the Nazis was to
fight the Soviet Union. The “historian” claimed that Hitler was astonished to find that the West had declared war on Germany, expecting
them to have joined the battle against the Soviets.
Cooper argued that the Jewish people in Europe were ideologically driven toward “Bolshevism,” and therefore were considered “prisoners of war.”
According to Cooper, with a lack of help from the West, the Nazis were
faced with too many prisoners and not enough humanitarian aid to care
for them in the “makeshift camps,” therefore, they decided to begin more “humane” executions.
In the interview, Cooper also painted UK Prime Minister Winston
Churchill as biased against Germany and motivated by the financial
backing of wealthy and influential Jewish “Zionists.” In response, Carlson thanked Cooper for his “accuracy and honesty,” calling him a “defender” of Western values.
Lawmakers from the U.S. House of Representatives put forward a
resolution condemning Carlson for platforming Cooper the following
month: “Darryl Cooper falsely claimed that the millions who perished in Nazi concentration camps did so because of humanitarian efforts and a
lack of resources, rather than the deliberate starvation and intentional genocide meticulously orchestrated by the Nazi regime… Cooper, in his words, presented the hyperbolic assessment that Hitler launched a war in
the Soviet East in 1941 and was completely unprepared to deal with the millions of prisoners-of-war, throwing millions into camps, and resulted
in the deaths of millions… Cooper points to letters in July 1941 from ‘commandants in these makeshift camps’ warning the Nazi German High Command that ‘[Nazi Germany] can’t feed these people’ and instead, he claims one Nazi commander suggested it be ‘more humane to just finish
them off quickly now?'”
The resolution further stated, “Holocaust revisionism is a dangerous and morally reprehensible distortion of historical truth, disrespecting the memory of over 6,000,000 Jewish victims and the countless others
murdered by the Nazis during the Holocaust.”
Dangerous Influence
If you wondered where Carlson would have stood during World War II, as millions of Jews—men, women, and children—were rounded up and massacred by the demonically driven Nazi Regime, you have your answer.
Considering the vocal anti-Israel positions of Carlson, these interviews
are simply par for the course. This is the same individual who
downplayed the actions of Hamas—the terrorists who massacred 1,200
Israelis on October 7th, 2023—and has advocated for America to align
itself with radical Palestinians rather than the Jewish State.
Many will dismiss the clearly antisemitic comments coming from Tucker
Carlson and his guests, wrongly assuming that people are no longer
listening. However, Carlson’s interview with Professor Dave Collum, at
the time of this publication, has received nearly 5 million views across various social media—not including views from podcast platforms. Viewers gushed in comments about the supposed “truth” that was being presented.
The sad reality is that people are listening, and as a result, hearts
are being hardened against God’s chosen people and nation'
'Tucker Carlson Interview Arguing The United States ‘Should Have Sided
With Hitler’ Garners Millions Of Views'
<https://harbingersdaily.com/tucker-carlson-interview-arguing-the-united-states-should-have-sided-with-hitler-garners-millions-of-views/>
'Through the use of false accusations, misleading information, and antisemitic conspiracies, Tucker Carlson’s Podcast is being used as a
tool to deceive.
While Carlson’s newfound disdain for the Jewish State has disgraced him
in the eyes of many conservatives and Christians, millions of his
followers remain, happily consuming content crafted to stoke public
opinion against Israel and the Jewish people as a whole.
Carlson’s latest podcast interview featured Professor David Collum from Cornell University. The episode surrounded multiple topics before
veering toward an outlandish discussion about the Second World War and
why the United States “should have sided with Hitler.”
In the interview, Collum began by insisting that the population’s information surrounding World War II “is all wrong,” to which Carlson promptly agreed.
“One can make the argument we should have sided with Hitler and fought Stalin,” Collum asserted, twisting a remark from U.S. General George S. Patton about the threat of the Soviet Union to bolster his claim.
Collum credited a book authored by Diana West for opening his eyes to
World War II “revisionist history.” However, the author was less than pleased to be lumped into the discussion. Following the interview, West
took to social media to publicly refute the idea that her book advocates
for “aligning with Hitler.”
‘Maybe There Wouldn’t Have Been A Holocaust’
Collum, speaking with Carlson, also bizarrely claimed that if America
had aligned itself with the Nazi Regime, “maybe there wouldn’t have been a holocaust.”
Carlson nodded along, failing to mention that the United States entered
World War II in December of 1941, when Hitler was already years into his bloody campaign against Jews and had constructed concentration camps to
carry out their mass execution.
How an alliance between Hitler and the United States would have ended
the Nazi leaders’ antisemitic ambitions was not explained in the
interview, nor questioned by Carlson.
One month after the United States joined the war, Hitler and his men
planned the “final solution to the Jewish question,” intending to systematically exterminate all European Jews. Hatred of Jews was deeply ingrained in the Nazi platform since its inception, resulting in the
deaths of six million Jews before Germany surrendered in 1945. According
to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Hitler’s first written statement on the “Jewish Question” was in 1919, where he defined his “ultimate goal” to be “the removal of the Jews altogether.”
The elimination of Jews was not a tertiary issue for Hitler, which the
right alliance could have restrained. Collum’s statements downplay the wickedness of Nazi Germany and seek to establish common ground between America and the goals of Adolf Hitler.
Darryl Cooper
To understand Collum’s flawed argument, it is helpful to venture back to September of 2024, when Carlson conducted an interview with Holocaust revisionist Darryl Cooper.
Cooper similarly insisted that the primary goal of the Nazis was to
fight the Soviet Union. The “historian” claimed that Hitler was astonished to find that the West had declared war on Germany, expecting
them to have joined the battle against the Soviets.
Cooper argued that the Jewish people in Europe were ideologically driven toward “Bolshevism,” and therefore were considered “prisoners of war.”
According to Cooper, with a lack of help from the West, the Nazis were
faced with too many prisoners and not enough humanitarian aid to care
for them in the “makeshift camps,” therefore, they decided to begin more “humane” executions.
In the interview, Cooper also painted UK Prime Minister Winston
Churchill as biased against Germany and motivated by the financial
backing of wealthy and influential Jewish “Zionists.” In response, Carlson thanked Cooper for his “accuracy and honesty,” calling him a “defender” of Western values.
Lawmakers from the U.S. House of Representatives put forward a
resolution condemning Carlson for platforming Cooper the following
month: “Darryl Cooper falsely claimed that the millions who perished in Nazi concentration camps did so because of humanitarian efforts and a
lack of resources, rather than the deliberate starvation and intentional genocide meticulously orchestrated by the Nazi regime… Cooper, in his words, presented the hyperbolic assessment that Hitler launched a war in
the Soviet East in 1941 and was completely unprepared to deal with the millions of prisoners-of-war, throwing millions into camps, and resulted
in the deaths of millions… Cooper points to letters in July 1941 from ‘commandants in these makeshift camps’ warning the Nazi German High Command that ‘[Nazi Germany] can’t feed these people’ and instead, he claims one Nazi commander suggested it be ‘more humane to just finish
them off quickly now?'”
The resolution further stated, “Holocaust revisionism is a dangerous and morally reprehensible distortion of historical truth, disrespecting the memory of over 6,000,000 Jewish victims and the countless others
murdered by the Nazis during the Holocaust.”
Dangerous Influence
If you wondered where Carlson would have stood during World War II, as millions of Jews—men, women, and children—were rounded up and massacred by the demonically driven Nazi Regime, you have your answer.
Considering the vocal anti-Israel positions of Carlson, these interviews
are simply par for the course. This is the same individual who
downplayed the actions of Hamas—the terrorists who massacred 1,200
Israelis on October 7th, 2023—and has advocated for America to align
itself with radical Palestinians rather than the Jewish State.
Many will dismiss the clearly antisemitic comments coming from Tucker
Carlson and his guests, wrongly assuming that people are no longer
listening. However, Carlson’s interview with Professor Dave Collum, at
the time of this publication, has received nearly 5 million views across various social media—not including views from podcast platforms. Viewers gushed in comments about the supposed “truth” that was being presented.
The sad reality is that people are listening, and as a result, hearts
are being hardened against God’s chosen people and nation'
Tucker has most definatley gone far off the rails. I stopped listening to
him years ago while he was on FoxNews which I also no longer watch for years.
'Tucker Carlson Interview Arguing The United States ‘Should Have Sided
With Hitler’ Garners Millions Of Views'
<https://harbingersdaily.com/tucker-carlson-interview-arguing-the-united-s >tates-should-have-sided-with-hitler-garners-millions-of-views/>
'Through the use of false accusations, misleading information, and >antisemitic conspiracies, Tucker Carlson’s Podcast is being used as a
tool to deceive.
While Carlson’s newfound disdain for the Jewish State has disgraced him
in the eyes of many conservatives and Christians, millions of his
followers remain, happily consuming content crafted to stoke public
opinion against Israel and the Jewish people as a whole.
Carlson’s latest podcast interview featured Professor David Collum from >Cornell University. The episode surrounded multiple topics before
veering toward an outlandish discussion about the Second World War and
why the United States “should have sided with Hitler.”
In the interview, Collum began by insisting that the population’s >information surrounding World War II “is all wrong,” to which Carlson >promptly agreed.
“One can make the argument we should have sided with Hitler and fought >Stalin,” Collum asserted, twisting a remark from U.S. General George S. >Patton about the threat of the Soviet Union to bolster his claim.
Collum credited a book authored by Diana West for opening his eyes to
World War II “revisionist history.” However, the author was less than >pleased to be lumped into the discussion. Following the interview, West
took to social media to publicly refute the idea that her book advocates
for “aligning with Hitler.”
‘Maybe There Wouldn’t Have Been A Holocaust’
Collum, speaking with Carlson, also bizarrely claimed that if America
had aligned itself with the Nazi Regime, “maybe there wouldn’t have
been a holocaust.”
Carlson nodded along, failing to mention that the United States entered
World War II in December of 1941, when Hitler was already years into his >bloody campaign against Jews and had constructed concentration camps to
carry out their mass execution.
How an alliance between Hitler and the United States would have ended
the Nazi leaders’ antisemitic ambitions was not explained in the
interview, nor questioned by Carlson.
One month after the United States joined the war, Hitler and his men
planned the “final solution to the Jewish question,” intending to >systematically exterminate all European Jews. Hatred of Jews was deeply >ingrained in the Nazi platform since its inception, resulting in the
deaths of six million Jews before Germany surrendered in 1945. According
to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Hitler’s first written >statement on the “Jewish Question” was in 1919, where he defined his >“ultimate goal” to be “the removal of the Jews altogether.”
The elimination of Jews was not a tertiary issue for Hitler, which the
right alliance could have restrained. Collum’s statements downplay the >wickedness of Nazi Germany and seek to establish common ground between >America and the goals of Adolf Hitler.
Darryl Cooper
To understand Collum’s flawed argument, it is helpful to venture back
to September of 2024, when Carlson conducted an interview with Holocaust >revisionist Darryl Cooper.
Cooper similarly insisted that the primary goal of the Nazis was to
fight the Soviet Union. The “historian” claimed that Hitler was >astonished to find that the West had declared war on Germany, expecting
them to have joined the battle against the Soviets.
Cooper argued that the Jewish people in Europe were ideologically driven >toward “Bolshevism,” and therefore were considered “prisoners of >war.” According to Cooper, with a lack of help from the West, the Nazis >were faced with too many prisoners and not enough humanitarian aid to
care for them in the “makeshift camps,” therefore, they decided to
begin more “humane” executions.
In the interview, Cooper also painted UK Prime Minister Winston
Churchill as biased against Germany and motivated by the financial
backing of wealthy and influential Jewish “Zionists.” In response, >Carlson thanked Cooper for his “accuracy and honesty,” calling him a >“defender” of Western values.
Lawmakers from the U.S. House of Representatives put forward a
resolution condemning Carlson for platforming Cooper the following
month: “Darryl Cooper falsely claimed that the millions who perished in >Nazi concentration camps did so because of humanitarian efforts and a
lack of resources, rather than the deliberate starvation and intentional >genocide meticulously orchestrated by the Nazi regime… Cooper, in his >words, presented the hyperbolic assessment that Hitler launched a war in
the Soviet East in 1941 and was completely unprepared to deal with the >millions of prisoners-of-war, throwing millions into camps, and resulted
in the deaths of millions… Cooper points to letters in July 1941 from >‘commandants in these makeshift camps’ warning the Nazi German High >Command that ‘[Nazi Germany] can’t feed these people’ and instead,
he claims one Nazi commander suggested it be ‘more humane to just
finish them off quickly now?'”
The resolution further stated, “Holocaust revisionism is a dangerous
and morally reprehensible distortion of historical truth, disrespecting
the memory of over 6,000,000 Jewish victims and the countless others
murdered by the Nazis during the Holocaust.”
Dangerous Influence
If you wondered where Carlson would have stood during World War II, as >millions of Jews—men, women, and children—were rounded up and
massacred by the demonically driven Nazi Regime, you have your answer.
Considering the vocal anti-Israel positions of Carlson, these interviews
are simply par for the course. This is the same individual who
downplayed the actions of Hamas—the terrorists who massacred 1,200
Israelis on October 7th, 2023—and has advocated for America to align
itself with radical Palestinians rather than the Jewish State.
Many will dismiss the clearly antisemitic comments coming from Tucker
Carlson and his guests, wrongly assuming that people are no longer
listening. However, Carlson’s interview with Professor Dave Collum, at
the time of this publication, has received nearly 5 million views across >various social media—not including views from podcast platforms.
Viewers gushed in comments about the supposed “truth” that was being >presented.
The sad reality is that people are listening, and as a result, hearts
are being hardened against God’s chosen people and nation'
...
Tucker has most definatley gone far off the rails. I stopped listening to
him years ago while he was on FoxNews which I also no longer watch for years.
One exception which I did watch was his interview with Putin. Not so much
for the interview but more for the tourist aspect of what living in Russia
is really like compared to what the western media is feeding us.
You see I have a close relative who visits Russia frequently and I've listenedOf course, just what is this description that we've been "told"?
to him speak of it as well as viewed pics he has taken and for the most part it was nothing like what we have been told.
Tucker's Putin interview more or less backed up my relative's experience and whileWhat percent of these have depopulated?
I realize Putin took Tucker to the best places etc my relative has been to various
large cities and they are all like that.The large cities, sure ... but how about small cities, towns & villages?
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 19:37:52 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 8/24/25 17:21, pothead wrote:
...
Tucker has most definatley gone far off the rails. I stopped listening to >>> him years ago while he was on FoxNews which I also no longer watch for years.
One exception which I did watch was his interview with Putin. Not so much >>> for the interview but more for the tourist aspect of what living in Russia >>> is really like compared to what the western media is feeding us.
Vague: just what description it that Western media is "feeding" to us?
You see I have a close relative who visits Russia frequently and I've listened
to him speak of it as well as viewed pics he has taken and for the most part
it was nothing like what we have been told.
Of course, just what is this description that we've been "told"?
Tucker's Putin interview more or less backed up my relative's experience and whileWhat percent of these have depopulated?
I realize Putin took Tucker to the best places etc my relative has been to various
large cities and they are all like that.The large cities, sure ... but how about small cities, towns & villages?
Pothead successfully proves once again that he's a commie plant.
On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 19:37:52 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 8/24/25 17:21, pothead wrote:
...
Tucker has most definatley gone far off the rails. I stopped listening to >>>> him years ago while he was on FoxNews which I also no longer watch for years.
One exception which I did watch was his interview with Putin. Not so much >>>> for the interview but more for the tourist aspect of what living in Russia >>>> is really like compared to what the western media is feeding us.
Vague: just what description it that Western media is "feeding" to us?
You see I have a close relative who visits Russia frequently and I've listened
to him speak of it as well as viewed pics he has taken and for the most part
it was nothing like what we have been told.
Of course, just what is this description that we've been "told"?
Tucker's Putin interview more or less backed up my relative's experience and whileWhat percent of these have depopulated?
I realize Putin took Tucker to the best places etc my relative has been to various
large cities and they are all like that.The large cities, sure ... but how about small cities, towns & villages?
Pothead successfully proves once again that he's a commie plant.
Leave it to hh high horse to turn this into a numbers issue.
As for the media feeding us misinformation, it's been going on since the 60's.
Remember the cartoon with Boris And Natasha, aka The Rocky and Bullwinkle show?
There is so, so, so much more.
On Aug 25, 2025 at 2:37:22 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <108il2i$3lakm$7@dont-email.me>:
On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 19:37:52 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 8/24/25 17:21, pothead wrote:
...
Tucker has most definatley gone far off the rails. I stopped listening to >>>>> him years ago while he was on FoxNews which I also no longer watch for years.
One exception which I did watch was his interview with Putin. Not so much >>>>> for the interview but more for the tourist aspect of what living in Russia
is really like compared to what the western media is feeding us.
Vague: just what description it that Western media is "feeding" to us? >>>>
You see I have a close relative who visits Russia frequently and I've listened
to him speak of it as well as viewed pics he has taken and for the most part
it was nothing like what we have been told.
Of course, just what is this description that we've been "told"?
Tucker's Putin interview more or less backed up my relative's experience >>>>> and whileWhat percent of these have depopulated?
I realize Putin took Tucker to the best places etc my relative has been to
various
large cities and they are all like that.The large cities, sure ... but how
about small cities, towns & villages?
Pothead successfully proves once again that he's a commie plant.
Leave it to hh high horse to turn this into a numbers issue.
As for the media feeding us misinformation, it's been going on since the 60's.
Remember the cartoon with Boris And Natasha, aka The Rocky and Bullwinkle show?
Of course both of you do.
Maybe you don't realize it but Russia had similar cartoons as the US had only
the US were the bad guys.
And there were many, many cartoons, shows, commercials airing that propaganda
and people swallowed it all because of course the US was champion and the
government would never lie to us, would they?
Of course not.
Duck and cover would save you from a nuclear strike.
Yea.
Put your head between your knees and kiss your ass goodbye.
How about all the cold war crap about Russia censorship of the press vs the >> freedom of the press here in the USA?
Surprise because the US government was lying to us just like the Russian
government was lying to their citizens.
Guess you may not know that the American space program was equally about
the military as it was about getting to the moon first. It was used as
a test bed for military technology from day one.
That was it's real purpose.
There is so, so, so much more.
and anyone who believes the government is a fool.
Doesn't matter what party is in charge.
They all lie.
Just like Russia.
Some truth in what you wrote, but a lot of exaggeration.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 12:21:51 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,717 |