• Bankers put focus on woke causes; Clinton, Pelosi campaign donors fille

    From Leroy N. Soetoro@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 19 20:04:56 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.society.liberalism, sac.politics
    XPost: alt.politics.republicans

    <https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/15/silicon-valley-banks- woke-agenda-thrived-while-man/>

    The woke philosophy of Silicon Valley Bank didn’t directly cause the cash crunch that led to its rapid failure, but analysts say the bank’s
    management paid more attention to its climate and social justice mission
    than its financial health.

    The analysts said SVB officers were heavily focused on so-called ESG
    policies while ignoring risk management responsibilities that could have detected trouble in time to save it from collapse and government
    intervention last week.

    ESG stands for environmental, social and governance.

    In another sign of trouble in the banking industry, officials in
    Switzerland on Wednesday were discussing with Credit Suisse Group AG ways
    to stabilize the huge bank after comments by its biggest shareholder led
    to a fall in its stock value to a record low. Saudi investors said they
    would no longer fund the bank.

    In the U.S., the recriminations continued over the bank collapse and the
    Biden administration’s rescue of SVB and New York’s Signature Bank. The
    Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission are
    investigating SVB‘s downfall, including stock sales by its top executives.

    Many of the questions are focusing on poor management.

    Only one member of SVB‘s board of directors, Tom King, had a career in the financial industry. The others were major campaign donors to Hillary
    Clinton, Rep. Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats.

    Bank director Garen Staglin, 78, is a winery owner in California who
    donated $54,000 to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign in 2016. Director Kate Mitchell
    is a venture capitalist who also donated heavily to Mrs. Clinton’s
    presidential campaign. After Donald Trump won the election, she prayed for guidance at a Shinto shrine in Japan.

    As an example of the bank’s left-wing agenda, SVB committed $5 billion in
    2022 toward “loans, investments, and other financing to support
    sustainability efforts” through 2027. The bank also pledged to be carbon- neutral by 2025 and promoted DEI — diversity, equity and inclusion — initiatives.

    SVB donated more than $73 million to the Black Lives Matter movement and
    other social justice causes, according to online data first reported by
    The Federalist.

    For most of the past year, the bank’s managers left vacant the post of
    risk management officer.

    “The reason for the failure was clearly poor judgment, poor management and maybe lack of supervision by regulators,” said David Kass, who teaches
    advanced financial management and business finance at the University of Maryland’s School of Business. “The bank did not have a risk officer.
    That’s absurd. It was just very poor management at the bank for investment policy.”

    As for a connection between the bank’s woke policies and its collapse, Mr.
    Kass said, “I don’t see the link.”

    The bank’s troubles became public on March 8 with a public notice that SVB
    had offloaded $21 billion worth of securities and intended to sell $1.25 billion of its stock. The credit rating firm Moody’s downgraded SVB.

    By the next morning, venture capital investors in SVB were warning one
    another about the bank’s apparent cash shortage. That day alone, investors pulled out roughly $42 billion from SVB accounts. State and federal
    regulators closed the bank the next day, March 10.

    Economists say the acute problem was that SVB held an unusually high
    percentage of its $209 billion in assets in Treasury bonds and mortgage-
    backed securities. As the Federal Reserve raised interest rates rapidly in
    the past year to fight soaring inflation, the value of the long-term debt
    held by SVB fell.

    As panicked investors withdrew money last week, the bank couldn’t easily
    sell its assets to cover its deposits.

    “The primary reason behind the collapse is the fact that the bank was
    taking in depositor money and putting it in investments that were not risk-appropriate,” said Joel Griffith, an economic policy researcher at
    the conservative Heritage Foundation. “Those investments plunged in value
    when interest rates went up.”

    As another example of poor management, Mr. Griffith said, SVB was paying
    its customers as much as 4.5% interest on their bank deposits.

    “Of course, none of us are getting that on our checking account,” he said.

    A woke agenda didn’t directly doom the bank, Mr. Griffith said, but it
    diverted management’s focus from the company’s basic financial health.

    “A lot of the managers were focused on a number of woke causes, including
    the risk manager in the United Kingdom who was involved in a number of
    social justice causes,” he said. “But the bottom line is, they apparently weren’t focused on actually managing the risk of the bank. Even when they
    had all of these ESG, DEI working groups and the big focus on ensuring
    that they were funding a lot of woke investments in the green energy
    space, at the same time they were doing all that, they went more than half
    this past year without a risk manager here in the United States office.”

    Mr. Griffith said many of SVB‘s investors were venture capitalists who
    reaped millions of dollars in government aid during an unprecedented pandemic-era spending binge by the Trump and Biden administrations.

    “A lot of the venture capital firms in that so-called clean energy space
    that had put their money on deposit at SVB, those are government-
    subsidized companies,” he said. “They are taking advantage of renewable
    energy mandates, of tax credits, of tax subsidies. They were awash in
    capital because so much money had been put into the stock market during
    COVID with all the money that was printed. So they were already benefiting
    at the expense of taxpayers. And then they put money at a woke bank,
    Silicon Valley Bank. These are sophisticated investors. These people are
    worth millions, if not billions, of dollars. And they chose to put those
    assets at risk, and there is no reason why they should be demanding a
    bailout.”

    At Signature Bank, Mr. Griffith said, managers parked deposits in long-
    term debt while vowing that the bank wouldn’t invest in fossil fuel
    companies, firms that built prisons or companies that manufactured weapons
    for the U.S. military.

    “Those are probably three of the safest investments a bank could make,” he said.

    Sen. John Kennedy, Louisiana Republican and a member of the Senate Banking Committee, said Wednesday that SVB‘s managers were not focused on what
    mattered most.

    “If the management of Silicon Valley Bank had known the difference between
    a banking textbook and an L.L. Bean catalog, Silicon Valley Bank would
    have never bought securities that are so sensitive to interest rates
    without hedging that risk, and it’s a very easy thing to do,” he said on
    the Senate floor.

    Mr. Kennedy also blamed regulators for failing to detect problems at SVB
    before it was too late.

    “Where were the regulators?” he said. “I guess they were asleep, but this
    whole debacle could have been avoided if the regulators had just done
    their job and stepped in and said, ‘Silicon Valley Bank, what you’re doing
    is dumb, and you can’t do it anymore.’”

    Mr. Kass said even some stock analysts at major banks were rating SVB
    shares as a good buy within one week of its collapse. He noted that
    JPMorgan and Wells Fargo rated SVB stock as “overweight” or worth buying
    on March 9 and Goldman Sachs rated it as “buy” on March 3.

    “A lot of people were asleep at the switch,” he said.

    • Dave Boyer can be reached at dboyer@washingtontimes.com.

    Comments:

    rnnicomments12
    Mar 17
    A woke agenda didn't directly doom the bank Mr. Griffith said. Yet the
    article states bank officers were heavily focused on ESG policies. So much
    so that they had not filled a risk managers position and only one of the
    board of directors had experience in the financial industry. The other
    members were major political campaign donors. Sounds as if Mr. Griffith's judgement that woke agenda policies didn't directly doom the bank may be
    poor judgement on his part.

    conscious1
    Mar 16
    "The woke philosophy of Silicon Valley Bank didn’t directly cause the cash crunch that led to its rapid failure"


    Woke managers who didn't have a clue how the real world or banking risk
    works did directly cause the failure by focusing too much on ideology
    rather than sound financials. I would call that a direct link. Maybe woke investments wasn't what caused the collapse but the intellectual myopia of those managers certainly was.


    1
    JohninRedding
    Mar 16
    "Only one member ofSVB‘s board of directors, Tom King, had a career in the financial industry." This, along with all the other directors being there because they were big time Democrat donor in addition to not having a risk management officer, is what doomed the bank. Americans need to wake up to
    the damage lefties are doing to the soul of this country. They need to recognize all the damage is being done intentionally.


    2
    JohnBeh
    Mar 16
    Edited
    Could it be that Biden is looking at a massive financial crisis in this country? Having Biden in charge is like having the head chef of a fancy restaurant be a monkey. what a messy kitchen!


    1

    1
    Statesrights
    Mar 16
    Another failure caused by Democrats and their WSP policies. Biden's bail
    out of SVB is a bail out for the rich since anyone with 250,000 or less
    are covered. Once again the middle class hard workers have to give their
    hard earned money to the rich. To top it all off Gov. Newsom ask for a
    bail out without disclosing his ties to the bank. A board that has Hillary Clinton Donors on it - sounds like Hunter Biden and Biden family all over again. Biden should really resign. His ties to China, his sons' conduct in
    his relationship with China, the border crisis, etc. etc. all this is
    enough for him to resign along with the VP.

    helgec01
    Mar 16
    On the surface, the 2008 financial crisis and the mini crisis of
    SVB/Signature Bank failures are different EXCEPT the underlying cause is
    THE SAME. Liberal (Democrat) social emphasis of the Community Reinvestment
    Act on all banks led to the corruption of underwriting standards and, ultimately, the failure of the system. The liberal social emphasis of ESG policy on the two failed banks in 2023, led to extreme corruption of underwriting and risk management by the bank Boards of
    Directors/managements as well as the bank supervisors (state and Federal) leading to failure of the banks. Sadly, this emphasis on ESG policy
    infects many other businesses as well and poor business performance is
    sure to follow.


    2
    BarbroNygren
    Mar 16
    Well, the Bankers were not bankers ,but Elite Democrat donors


    --
    "LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
    recover with no after effects.

    No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
    Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

    Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
    ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

    Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
    fiasco, President Trump.

    Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
    The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
    queer liberal democrat donors.

    President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)