XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.law-enforcement, atl.general
XPost: sac.politics, alt.politics.nationalism.black

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/12/nx-s1-5430354/supreme-court-sue-wrong- house-raid

A unanimous Supreme Court said a family whose house was wrongly raided by
law enforcement can sue.

At issue is what law enforcement refers to as "wrong-house raids." Local, state, or, as in the case before the court, federal officers smash into a private home to find a suspect, but it's the wrong house. That's what
happened to Trina Martin, her 7-year-old son Gabe, and Trina's partner,
Toi Cliatt, in their Atlanta home in 2017 when they their house was
wrongly raided by FBI and SWAT agents who were serving an arrest warrant
for a neighbor accused of gang activity.

In 2019 the family sued the FBI and individual agents for the wrong-house
raid. It's never easy to bring such cases in state court, and it is even
harder in federal court. That's because the federal government is
generally immune from being sued, except in certain circumstances set out
by Congress. The question for the Supreme Court was whether this wrong-
house raid falls within those circumstances.

The U.S. government typically benefits from "sovereign immunity," meaning
it can't be sued. But Congress passed the Federal Tort Claims Act in 1946 making an exception to allow lawsuits against the federal government for
harms caused by its employees. The statute was amended in 1974, partly in response to two high-profile wrong-house FBI raids.

The question for the Supreme Court is whether the statute, as amended, now allows victims to sue, period. Or can they sue only if the perpetrators of
the raid were following government orders, here orders from the FBI.

The government's argument is that the FBI officers were told to go to the
right home, not the home they raided, and that the FBI should not be
liable for every wrong judgment call a federal officer makes in these
stressful situations. In the government's view, the officers were tasked
with executing a raid on the house of a "dangerous individual," and making
the government pay up for the officers' mistake would undermine federal
law enforcement's ability to do its job in the future.

Martin and Cliatt counter that it shouldn't matter whether the officers
made this mistake, even though they were given the right address, because Congress intended for the government to be held accountable in these exact kinds of situations when it amended the statute in 1974.

The high court's 6-3 conservative majority has had plenty of chances to
weigh in against these wrong-house raids. But for decades, the court has rejected several claims against law enforcement officers, making it more difficult to bring cases like this one.

On Thursday, it took a different course. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the
opinion for the unanimous court.


--
November 5, 2024 - Congratulations President Donald Trump. We look
forward to America being great again.

We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Every day is an IQ test. Some pass, some, not so much.

Thank you for cleaning up the disasters of the 2008-2017, 2020-2024 Obama
/ Biden / Harris fiascos, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)