Original capture in online intellectual property rights is a reference to the original source material used in chatgpt’s llm semantic block. The intellectual property meat grinder that Chatgpt has become lends itself to misappropriation, a factor that
could be remedied by a boomerang (or Uberang) effect by listing names entities recognized (NER) by chatgpt on the original source material used for the semantic corpus. In this way original property rights can be protected and correctly credited for
contributing to Chatgpt’s query results. A risk associated with networking online in managing marketing of intellectual property is that it will escape to another developing vendor just by social mention who then closes the deal having a captured
point of sale. I refer to this as escape costs because it games the way intellectual property is captured or appropriated socially so it doesn’t escape as a solicited solution. The other social media term I’d like to introduce is capture costs or
what it costs to tie down a brand name of product before it is socially transmitted. This may include startup development costs and intellectual property filing legal fees. Lastly chase costs involve costs chasing a socially escaped concept or idea
intended for review as investment worthy and which must be pursued by intellectual property prosecution that may or may not yield a duty to investors.

https://www.patreon.com/saggadoggcorp

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)