• Sticking it to Google

    From Retrograde@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 1 02:01:48 2023
    From the «at last» department:
    Feed: Technology | The Guardian
    Title: Has Google’s monopoly on the search engine market finally timed out? | John Naughton
    Author: John Naughton
    Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 11:00:18 -0400
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/sep/30/google-antitrust-us-department-of-justice-court-case-monopoly

    The US justice department is belatedly addressing the company’s stranglehold on
    digital advertising technologies in the most significant antitrust case for more
    than two decades

    Although you’d never guess it from mainstream media, the most significant antitrust case in more than 20 years[1] is under way in Washington. In it, the US justice department, alongside the attorneys general of eight states, is suing
    Google for abusively monopolising digital advertising technologies, thereby subverting competition through “serial acquisitions” and anti-competitive auction manipulation. Or, to put it more prosaically, arguing that Google – which has between 90% and 95% of the search market – has maintained its monopoly
    not by making a better product, but by locking down almost every avenue through which consumers might find a different search engine and making sure they only see Google wherever they look.

    Why is this significant? Basically, because the US government has been asleep at
    the wheel for almost a quarter of a century and has finally woken up to its democratic responsibilities. The last time it stirred itself to take on an aggressive monopolist was in 2001, when it sued Microsoft for illegally tying its Internet Explorer browser to Windows as part of a (successful) campaign to destroy Netscape, maker of the first distinctive commercial web browser[2], which Bill Gates and co perceived as a potentially lethal competitive threat. In
    an eerie echo of that earlier lawsuit, the justice department is now accusing Google of similar tactics – for example, illegally tying the company’s search
    engine to its Android smartphone operating system and its Chrome browser. And the government is seeking to break up the company, just as it once sought to break up Microsoft[3].
    Continue reading...[4]

    Links:
    [1]: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-google-monopolizing-digital-advertising-technologies (link)
    [2]: https://www.theguardian.com/global/2015/mar/22/web-browser-came-back-haunt-microsoft (link)
    [3]: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2001/nov/01/microsoft.business (link)
    [4]: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/sep/30/google-antitrust-us-department-of-justice-court-case-monopoly (link)



    --
    Social media is for when too few idiots surround you in real life

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Trew@21:1/5 to Retrograde on Sun Oct 1 00:09:12 2023
    On 9/30/2023 10:01 PM, Retrograde wrote:
    From the «at last» department:

    Yes, about time!

    The US justice department is belatedly addressing the company’s stranglehold on
    digital advertising technologies in the most significant antitrust case for more
    than two decades

    (snip)
    arguing that Google –
    which has between 90% and 95% of the search market – has maintained its monopoly
    not by making a better product, but by locking down almost every avenue through
    which consumers might find a different search engine and making sure they only
    see Google wherever they look.

    I switched to Duck Duck Go several years ago, and I haven't looked back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)