XPost: uk.legal, alt.revisionism, alt.politics.republicans
XPost: soc.culture.israel
Peeler wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 23:52:53 +0000, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "Anita 'Annie' Shein is jew paedophile BARRY SHEIN's dead circumcised jew mum", farted again:
Yup.
Indeed.
Yup, BOTH of you ridiculous neo-nazi shitheads are indeed VERY VERY sick assholes ...and total laughing stocks! LOL
Indeed.
Remember how Joe Cooper used to dominate them and humiliate them?
Here is an article on a much more intellectually stimulating topic.
https://groups.google.com/g/Sci.Med.Cardiology/c/euGqyEsRe_4/m/zXyYXt9YAgAJ
Maine Moves to Stifle Conventional Views on Gender
Signs at a rally for transgender rights at city hall in Portland Maine,
March 1, 2017. (Derek Davis/Portland Portland Press Herald via Getty Images) Share
5 Comments
Listen
By JAMES ERWIN
January 26, 2024 6:30 AM
A bill being debated by the legislature would allow the state to take gender-dysphoric kids away from parents who disagree with
‘gender-affirming care.’
All Our Opinion in Your Inbox
NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.
Enter your email
LD 1735, “An Act to Safeguard Gender-affirming Health Care,” would allow Maine courts to take custody of any child from their parents if the
latter disagree with “gender-affirming care” as defined by the state.
That is no exaggeration — the bill text specifically says a court may
take temporary custody of a child “in an emergency” if the child is
present in Maine and “has been unable to obtain gender-affirming health
care or gender-affirming mental health care.”
So “in an emergency” (the vagueness of this term is especially
troubling), a parent of a child experiencing gender dysphoria may not
have a conversation with their child, teach self-acceptance, or
communicate their values if they do not believe that a sex change is the
only answer. If they exercise their First Amendment rights in this way,
they could lose custody of their children.
And “gender-affirming care” is broadly defined. The bill text repeatedly states that whether or not such care is warranted is up to the child in question, and it explicitly includes hormone treatments, mastectomies,
and castration as protected procedures. The bill would also make Maine a
safe haven for minors to come receive sex changes if they hail from one
of the states that have begun to restrict such procedures for the
underaged. Courts and officers of the law would be barred from reuniting kidnapped children with their legal guardians if the children came to
Maine for gender-affirming care against their guardians’ wishes.
“It undermines the law in other states and legalizes kidnapping,” state representative Katrina Smith, an opponent of the legislation, told me.
“A child could jump on a bus and come to Maine with any stranger they
meet online who tells them, ‘Trust me, not your parents.’”
Smith introduced a bill last year to require parental notification from
schools if a student starts using a different name or pronouns, which
was defeated by the legislature’s Democrat supermajority. She says that
she is sympathetic to those who experience gender dysphoria, especially children, and emphasizes that LD 1735 targets minors and their parents,
not consenting adults.
Maine’s legislature is part-time, and committee attendance can be poor
during the workweek. As a result, three of the eight Democrats on the
Judiciary Committe
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)