Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the existence and causes of climate change.
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 15:31:44 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth >> had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with
plants and life existed happily on this planet.
But not human life.
Swill
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying
the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I
resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with
plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the existence and causes of climate change.
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long >> as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I
resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth >> had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants >> and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree
with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with
the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained
by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter
than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar
and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to
the atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just
the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to
the axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a
shift in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is
broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that
would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact
global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing
Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each, independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
the problem is climate change is a constant and
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as >>>> they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent >>>> them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth >>>> had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than it
is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and >>> atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the >>> atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the >>> last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the >>> axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken up
into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would >>> speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global >>> temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler periods
as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.
Fantastic book
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the >>>> existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and >> zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as they
keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent them
trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth had
10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants and >> life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed to
CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:34:25 -0800
Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> wrote:
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and
*admits* it — lied:
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as
they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent
them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than it
is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the >>>>> atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the >>>>> axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken up
into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler periods
as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have >>>>> occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue. >>>>> And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.
A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
Credentials
M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
MBA from the University of Chicago.
Fantastic book
Piece of shit political polemic.
Fuck off, you priest-fucked nobody.
I feel a more reasoned argument might help; these Climate Deniers need
help.
Science is real.
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and
*admits* it — lied:
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as
they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent
them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than it
is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the >>> atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the >>> axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken up
into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler periods
as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue. >>> And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.
A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
Credentials
M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
MBA from the University of Chicago.
Fantastic book
Piece of shit political polemic.
Fuck off, you priest-fucked nobody.
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying >>>>> the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists >>> and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". >>> I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying
the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists >>>> and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". >>>> I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not >>>> take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than >>> it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and >>> atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the >>> atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the >>> last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the >>> axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift >>> in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken >>> up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would >>> speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global >>> temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler
periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham. Fantastic book that deals with this climate hysteria we're all gonna die the sky is falling nonsense.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as >>>> they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent >>>> them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth >>>> had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the >>>> existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and
*admits* it — lied:
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists >>>>> and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I >>>>> resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not >>>>> take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than >>>> it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and >>>> atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the >>>> atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the >>>> last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the >>>> axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken >>>> up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would >>>> speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global >>>> temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler
periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue. >>>> And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.
A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
  Credentials
  M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
  MBA from the University of Chicago.
Lou Bricano wrote:
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —
and *admits* it — lied:
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists >>>>>> and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I >>>>>> resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not >>>>>> take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with >>>>>> plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than
it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the >>>>> atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the >>>>> axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift >>>>> in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken
up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core >>>>> towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat >>>>> transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler >>>>> periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have >>>>> occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue. >>>>> And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.
A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
   Credentials
   M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
   MBA from the University of Chicago.
Looks to me that he's smarter than you and
On 1/22/2024 2:46 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Lou Bricano wrote:
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —
and *admits* it — lied:
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as >>>>>>> long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered >>>>>>> with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than
it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so. >>>>>> Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift
in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken
up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core. >>>>>> Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core >>>>>> towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat >>>>>> transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler >>>>>> periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have >>>>>> occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue. >>>>>> And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe >>>>> where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.
A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
   Credentials
   M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
   MBA from the University of Chicago.
Looks to me that he's smarter than you and
No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate, just
like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a squat-to-piss fairy.
On 1/22/24 6:24 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 1/22/2024 2:46 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Lou Bricano wrote:
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —
and *admits* it — lied:
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as >>>>>>>> long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will >>>>>>>> not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered >>>>>>>> with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter >>>>>>> than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar >>>>>>> and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just >>>>>>> the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so. >>>>>>> Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift
in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is >>>>>>> broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core. >>>>>>> Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that >>>>>>> would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core >>>>>>> towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat >>>>>>> transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact >>>>>>> global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing >>>>>>> Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have >>>>>>> occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue. >>>>>>> And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe >>>>>> where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.
A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
   Credentials
   M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1 >>>>    MBA from the University of Chicago.
Looks to me that he's smarter than you and
No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate, >> just like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a
squat-to-piss fairy.
But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the >>>> existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and >> zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as they
keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent them
trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth had
10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants and >> life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed to
CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
On 1/22/24 6:24 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 1/22/2024 2:46 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Lou Bricano wrote:
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of
times — and *admits* it — lied:
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics >>>>>>>> and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does >>>>>>>> not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other
factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time >>>>>>>> the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet
was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet. >>>>>>>
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without >>>>>>> harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C
hotter than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by >>>>>>> solar and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another
reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the
surface to the atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in >>>>>>> just the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so. >>>>>>> Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass
closer to the axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest >>>>>>> a shift in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it >>>>>>> is broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core. >>>>>>> Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center..
that would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner
core towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate >>>>>>> of heat transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to
impact global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly
even causing Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes >>>>>>> have occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now
have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe >>>>>> where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by
Steve Goreham.
A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
   Credentials
   M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1 >>>>    MBA from the University of Chicago.
Looks to me that he's smarter than you and
No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about
climate, just like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not
tough. You're a squat-to-piss fairy.
But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics,
unlike you and all climate "scientists".
But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics,
unlike you and all climate "scientists".
The author sources every claim he makes in the book, which is an excellent read. Meanwhile Jon Ball, resident dwarf, puts his full faith and credit into leading climate experts like Al Gore, Bill Nye and Klaus Schwab.
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree >>>>> with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with
the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term. >>>>>
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained >>>>> by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered >>>>> with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying >>>>> the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and
pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying >>>>> the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists >>> and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". >>> I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?
Nothing.
We're not talking about how much CO2 we're breathing at ground level, scooter, you stupid fuck.
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
Meanwhile
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in message news:99GrN.44050$SyNd.21902@fx33.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as >>>> they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent >>>> them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth >>>> had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere trapping >> heat, scooter?
Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat... but I
don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.
Nothing.
Ok, then we don't need to worry about carbon emissions then.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists >>>>>> and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I >>>>>> resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not >>>>>> take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with >>>>>> plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim >> about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my breath
waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You just blurt
bullshit and run away from it.
I regularly supplied citations.
So you want it. you can find it.
On 1/22/2024 7:22 PM, Anonymous wrote:
On 1/22/24 6:24 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 1/22/2024 2:46 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Lou Bricano wrote:
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times >>>>> — and *admits* it — lied:
On 1/22/2024 10:47 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Scout wrote:
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and >>>>>>>>> irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree >>>>>>>>> with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with >>>>>>>>> the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term. >>>>>>>>>
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained >>>>>>>>> by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>>>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered >>>>>>>>> with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter >>>>>>>> than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame? >>>>>>>>
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar >>>>>>>> and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason? >>>>>>>> A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to >>>>>>>> the atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just >>>>>>>> the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so. >>>>>>>> Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to >>>>>>>> the axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a >>>>>>>> shift in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is >>>>>>>> broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core. >>>>>>>> Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that >>>>>>>> would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core >>>>>>>> towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat >>>>>>>> transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact >>>>>>>> global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing >>>>>>>> Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have >>>>>>>> occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.
Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each, >>>>>>> independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe >>>>>>> where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden >>>>>>> without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.
Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.
A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
   Credentials
   M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1 >>>>>    MBA from the University of Chicago.
Looks to me that he's smarter than you and
No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate, >>> just like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a >>> squat-to-piss fairy.
But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics,
unlike you and all climate "scientists".
The author sources every claim he makes in the book, which is an excellent read.
Meanwhile Jon Ball,
On 1/23/2024 5:28 AM, Scout wrote:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in
message news:99GrN.44050$SyNd.21902@fx33.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree >>>>> with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with
the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term. >>>>>
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained >>>>> by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered >>>>> with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?
Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat...
but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.
The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and >>>>>>> irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections >>>>>>> with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that >>>>>>> term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors. >>>>>>>
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't
hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations,
scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.
I regularly supplied citations.
No, scooter,
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting] >>>>> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and >>>>> pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's >>> right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting] >>>>>> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and >>>>>> pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in message news:ofSrN.44079$SyNd.8106@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:28 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in >>> message news:99GrN.44050$SyNd.21902@fx33.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists >>>>>> and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I >>>>>> resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not >>>>>> take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by >>>>>> natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with >>>>>> plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere trapping
heat, scooter?
Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat... but
I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.
The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.
Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as >>>>>>>> long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will >>>>>>>> not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered >>>>>>>> with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim >>>> about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my >>>> breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You >>>> just blurt bullshit and run away from it.
I regularly supplied citations.
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
On 1/23/2024 10:06 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and >>>>>>>>> irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not >>>>>>>>> agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously >>>>>>>>> who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other
factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time >>>>>>>>> the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was >>>>>>>>> covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without >>>>>>>> harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie >>>>> claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't >>>>> hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, >>>>> scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.
I regularly supplied citations.
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
You mean citations
On 1/23/2024 10:09 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in
message news:ofSrN.44079$SyNd.8106@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:28 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote >>>> in message news:99GrN.44050$SyNd.21902@fx33.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and >>>>>>> irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections >>>>>>> with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that >>>>>>> term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors. >>>>>>>
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?
Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping
heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.
The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are
not.
Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural
The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.
On 1/23/2024 10:10 AM, Scout wrote:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent >>>>>>> immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never*
refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and >>>>>>> pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit.
That's right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
No, scooter.
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in message news:2lVrN.44872$Iswd.23493@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:09 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in >>> message news:ofSrN.44079$SyNd.8106@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:28 AM, scooter lied:Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in >>>>> message news:99GrN.44050$SyNd.21902@fx33.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as >>>>>>>> long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will >>>>>>>> not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered >>>>>>>> with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere >>>>>> trapping heat, scooter?
Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat... >>>>> but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.
The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not. >>>
The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not naturally >> occurring, scooter.
Sure they are.
Fossil fuels are naturally occurring.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:3lVrN.44873$Iswd.10394@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:06 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and >>>>>>>>>> irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree
with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with >>>>>>>>>> the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term. >>>>>>>>>>
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained
by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors. >>>>>>>>>>
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the >>>>>>>>>> earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently >>>>>>>>> exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim
about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my >>>>>> breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You
just blurt bullshit and run away from it.
I regularly supplied citations.
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!
..that you can't provide.
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1lVrN.44871$Iswd.3328@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:10 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent >>>>>>>> immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting] >>>>>>>> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and >>>>>>>> pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's >>>>>> right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
No, scooter.
Rudy argues like
On 1/24/2024 5:53 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3lVrN.44873$Iswd.10394@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:06 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:I regularly supplied citations.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, >>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics >>>>>>>>>>> and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does >>>>>>>>>>> not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply >>>>>>>>>>> connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be >>>>>>>>>>> explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other >>>>>>>>>>> factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time >>>>>>>>>>> the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet >>>>>>>>>>> was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet. >>>>>>>>>>
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without >>>>>>>>>> harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie >>>>>>> claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I
won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide
citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it. >>>>>>
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!
..that you can't provide.
Of course not
On 1/24/2024 5:59 AM, Scout wrote:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in
message news:2lVrN.44872$Iswd.23493@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:09 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote >>>> in message news:ofSrN.44079$SyNd.8106@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:28 AM, scooter lied:
The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are >>>>> not.
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA>
wrote in message news:99GrN.44050$SyNd.21902@fx33.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and >>>>>>>>> irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not >>>>>>>>> agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously >>>>>>>>> who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other
factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time >>>>>>>>> the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was >>>>>>>>> covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without >>>>>>>> harm
What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere >>>>>>> trapping heat, scooter?
Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping
heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned. >>>>>
Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural
The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.
Sure they are.
No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.
On 1/24/2024 6:00 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1lVrN.44871$Iswd.3328@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:10 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent >>>>>>>>> immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never*
refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant >>>>>>>>> and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. >>>>>>> That's right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
No, scooter.
Rudy argues like
No
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OO9sN.53945$5Hnd.37258@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 6:00 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1lVrN.44871$Iswd.3328@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:10 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent >>>>>>>>>> immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and >>>>>>>>>> pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's
right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
No, scooter.
Rudy argues like
No, scooter.
You can't even argue?
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:jO9sN.53934$5Hnd.31@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:53 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3lVrN.44873$Iswd.10394@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:06 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
No citation, so it's a lie.
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, >>>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and >>>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not >>>>>>>>>>>> agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections
with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that
term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be >>>>>>>>>>>> explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was >>>>>>>>>>>> covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet. >>>>>>>>>>>
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm >>>>>>>>>>
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie >>>>>>>> claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't >>>>>>>> hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, >>>>>>>> scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.
I regularly supplied citations.
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!
..that you can't provide.
Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing citations. I
can't cite something that doesn't exist.
I knew it all along.
On 1/24/2024 9:03 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:jO9sN.53934$5Hnd.31@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:53 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3lVrN.44873$Iswd.10394@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:06 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:I regularly supplied citations.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> message news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop
misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, >>>>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics >>>>>>>>>>>>> and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who >>>>>>>>>>>>> does not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>> imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>> seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be >>>>>>>>>>>>> explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other >>>>>>>>>>>>> factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last >>>>>>>>>>>>> time the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire >>>>>>>>>>>>> planet was covered with plants and life existed happily on >>>>>>>>>>>>> this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and >>>>>>>>>>>> consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm >>>>>>>>>>>> without harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your >>>>>>>>> lie claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." >>>>>>>>> I won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide >>>>>>>>> citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it. >>>>>>>>
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!
..that you can't provide.
Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing
citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.
I knew it all along.
Did you
On 1/24/2024 9:04 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iO9sN.53933$5Hnd.21932@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:59 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote >>>> in message news:2lVrN.44872$Iswd.23493@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:09 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA>
wrote in message news:ofSrN.44079$SyNd.8106@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:28 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> >>>>>>>> wrote in message news:99GrN.44050$SyNd.21902@fx33.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net...
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, >>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics >>>>>>>>>>> and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does >>>>>>>>>>> not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply >>>>>>>>>>> connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be >>>>>>>>>>> explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other >>>>>>>>>>> factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time >>>>>>>>>>> the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet >>>>>>>>>>> was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet. >>>>>>>>>>
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without >>>>>>>>>> harm
What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper
atmosphere trapping heat, scooter?
Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping >>>>>>>> heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be
banned.
The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are >>>>>>> not.
Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural
The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.
Sure they are.
No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.
So you're saying humans are not natural?
Something naturally occurring
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:ieesN.68812$GX69.44035@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:03 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:jO9sN.53934$5Hnd.31@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:53 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3lVrN.44873$Iswd.10394@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:06 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and >>>>>>>>>>>>> consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply >>>>>>>>>>>>>> connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously
who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie >>>>>>>>>> claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't
hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, >>>>>>>>>> scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.
I regularly supplied citations.
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!
..that you can't provide.
Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing
citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.
I knew it all along.
Did you, scooter? If so, scooter, then why did you bitchily demand that I "cite"
something that doesn't exist? That's completely illogical, scooter. It's your
usual demanding that someone prove a negative.
Yep, because
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:eeesN.68810$GX69.46367@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OO9sN.53945$5Hnd.37258@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 6:00 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1lVrN.44871$Iswd.3328@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:10 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent >>>>>>>>>>>> immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and
pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. >>>>>>>>>> That's right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
No, scooter.
Rudy argues like
No, scooter.
You can't even argue?
I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is >> argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.
Stomping your feet and
On 1/25/2024 8:03 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eeesN.68810$GX69.46367@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OO9sN.53945$5Hnd.37258@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 6:00 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1lVrN.44871$Iswd.3328@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:10 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop
misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an >>>>>>>>>>>>> opponent immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* >>>>>>>>>>>>> refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something >>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid >>>>>>>>>>> fuckwit. That's right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
No, scooter.
Rudy argues like
No, scooter.
You can't even argue?
I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, >>> is argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.
Stomping your feet and
No
On 1/25/2024 8:02 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:ieesN.68812$GX69.44035@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:03 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:jO9sN.53934$5Hnd.31@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:53 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:3lVrN.44873$Iswd.10394@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:06 AM, scooter lied:..that you can't provide.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> message news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> message news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterics and irrationalists as long as they keep calling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet was covered with plants and life existed happily on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> without harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your >>>>>>>>>>> lie claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without >>>>>>>>>>> harm." I won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never >>>>>>>>>>> provide citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away >>>>>>>>>>> from it.
I regularly supplied citations.
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha! >>>>>>
Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing
citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.
I knew it all along.
Did you, scooter? If so, scooter, then why did you bitchily demand that
I "cite" something that doesn't exist? That's completely illogical,
scooter. It's your usual demanding that someone prove a negative.
Yep, because
No
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:XpxsN.83234$STLe.528@fx34.iad...
On 1/25/2024 8:02 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:ieesN.68812$GX69.44035@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:03 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:jO9sN.53934$5Hnd.31@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:53 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:3lVrN.44873$Iswd.10394@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:06 AM, scooter lied:..that you can't provide.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:I regularly supplied citations.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does
not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I >>>>>>>>>>>> won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide >>>>>>>>>>>> citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it. >>>>>>>>>>>
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha! >>>>>>>
Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing >>>>>> citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.
I knew it all along.
Did you, scooter? If so, scooter, then why did you bitchily demand that I >>>> "cite" something that doesn't exist? That's completely illogical, scooter. >>>> It's your usual demanding that someone prove a negative.
Yep, because
No, scooter, you didn't know anything all along. That's a lie.
It's settled: you never support your claims.
Rudy
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:SIxsN.255943$Wp_8.29573@fx17.iad...
On 1/25/2024 8:03 AM, scooter lied:No, scooter. I can argue, scooter, and obviously better than you.
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eeesN.68810$GX69.46367@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OO9sN.53945$5Hnd.37258@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 6:00 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1lVrN.44871$Iswd.3328@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:10 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. >>>>>>>>>>>> That's right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
No, scooter.
Rudy argues like
No, scooter.
You can't even argue?
I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is
argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.
Stomping your feet and
Rudy's
On 1/25/2024 8:03 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eeesN.68810$GX69.46367@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OO9sN.53945$5Hnd.37258@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 6:00 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1lVrN.44871$Iswd.3328@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:10 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent >>>>>>>>>>>>> immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant >>>>>>>>>>>>> and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. >>>>>>>>>>> That's right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
No, scooter.
Rudy argues like
No, scooter.
You can't even argue?
I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is >>> argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.
Stomping your feet and
No, scooter. I can argue, scooter, and obviously better than you.
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:TIxsN.255944$Wp_8.129819@fx17.iad...
On 1/25/2024 8:03 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:heesN.68811$GX69.60194@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:04 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iO9sN.53933$5Hnd.21932@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:59 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in
message news:2lVrN.44872$Iswd.23493@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:09 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote
in message news:ofSrN.44079$SyNd.8106@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:28 AM, scooter lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote in message news:99GrN.44050$SyNd.21902@fx33.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and >>>>>>>>>>>>> consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply >>>>>>>>>>>>>> connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously
who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?
Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping >>>>>>>>>>> heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.
The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.
Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural
The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not >>>>>>>> naturally occurring, scooter.
Sure they are.
No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.
So you're saying humans are not natural?
Something naturally occurring, scooter, means something that does *not* >>>> occur do to human activity — by definition, scooter. With very rare
exceptions, scooter, fossil fuels do not spontaneously combust, and when >>>> they do, it is virtually always *after* they have been extracted from
underground by humans — which means it is not a natural occurrence, scooter.
What a stupid, stubborn drunken Virginia camper you are, scooter!
Yes they are.
That's yes, *you* are, scooter.
It's settled: the emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels
is not naturally occurring.
Time for you to concede defeat on this and move along to your next exercise in
futility, scooter.
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is
On 1/25/2024 8:03 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eeesN.68810$GX69.46367@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OO9sN.53945$5Hnd.37258@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 6:00 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1lVrN.44871$Iswd.3328@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:10 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nfSrN.44078$SyNd.33882@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i4CrN.221404$Ama9.152854@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:54 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JywrN.295216$xHn7.5041@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:20 AM, Scout wrote:
"useapen" <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB0FFE2843415BBX@135.181.20.170...
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
Well,
Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent >>>>>>>>>>>>> immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant >>>>>>>>>>>>> and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
Rudy attacks the language I use because
because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. >>>>>>>>>>> That's right.
And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.
No, scooter.
Snipped at
No, scooter.
Rudy argues like
No, scooter.
You can't even argue?
I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is >>> argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.
Stomping your feet and
No, scooter. I can argue, scooter, and obviously better than you.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:XpxsN.83234$STLe.528@fx34.iad...
On 1/25/2024 8:02 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:ieesN.68812$GX69.44035@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 9:03 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:jO9sN.53934$5Hnd.31@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:53 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:3lVrN.44873$Iswd.10394@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:06 AM, scooter lied:..that you can't provide.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:pfSrN.44080$SyNd.13903@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:18 AM, scooter lied:
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:n4CrN.221405$Ama9.8477@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:53 PM, scooter lied:I regularly supplied citations.
"But...but...but...FREEDOM!" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:IywrN.295213$xHn7.271930@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 5:34 AM, scooter lied:
"D" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:3e0aa36e-08c1-4b40-b950-e8e3732fc754@example.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.
But, but, Freedom!
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does
not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.
Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm
No citation, so it's a lie.
Sorry, I didn't see your citation
You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I >>>>>>>>>>>> won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide >>>>>>>>>>>> citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it. >>>>>>>>>>>
No, scooter, you don't. You never do.
Without you supplying citations
You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha! >>>>>>>
Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing >>>>>> citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.
I knew it all along.
Did you, scooter? If so, scooter, then why did you bitchily demand that I >>>> "cite" something that doesn't exist? That's completely illogical, scooter. >>>> It's your usual demanding that someone prove a negative.
Yep, because
No, scooter, you didn't know anything all along. That's a lie.
It's settled: you never support your claims.
Rudy
On 1/25/2024 11:00 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote:
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is
unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 12:32:07 -0700, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 1/26/2024 9:01 AM, Wilson Woods wrote:
On 1/25/2024 11:00 AM, scooter lied:The last I checked, humans are part of nature. Therefore,
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote:
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is
unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.
things humans do are natural.
Yeah, air conditioning, automobiles and polyester are all *extremely* natural.
You just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature. That is unnatural.
You want to exclude humans from a planet that cannot support human life.
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 10:50:34 -0700, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 1/27/2024 4:12 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 12:32:07 -0700, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what
On 1/26/2024 9:01 AM, Wilson Woods wrote:
On 1/25/2024 11:00 AM, scooter lied:The last I checked, humans are part of nature. Therefore,
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote:unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is >>>>>
things humans do are natural.
Yeah, air conditioning, automobiles and polyester are all *extremely* natural.
you think it means." - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride.
Now you're just being silly. Humans are the most adaptableYou just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature. That is unnatural.
You want to exclude humans from a planet that cannot support human life. >>>
multi-cellular species that ever existed. Taken as a whole,
a small CO2-driven temperature rise is actually good for the
ecosphere.
Small? Like, how many parts per million?
On 1/27/2024 4:12 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 12:32:07 -0700, Francis Mark Hansen <fmhlaw@comcast.net>, sleazy rent-skip chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:
On 1/26/2024 9:01 AM, Wilson Woods wrote:
On 1/25/2024 11:00 AM, scooter lied:The last I checked, humans are part of nature. Therefore,
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote:unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is >>>>
things humans do are natural.
Yeah, air conditioning, automobiles and polyester are all *extremely* natural.
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what
you think it means."
Now you're just being silly. Humans are the most adaptable You just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature. That is unnatural.
You want to exclude humans from a planet that cannot support human life.
multi-cellular species that ever existed. Taken as a whole,
a small CO2-driven temperature rise is actually good for the
ecosphere.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 38:27:34 |
| Calls: | 10,392 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,176 |