• It was only a crime after "quickening,"

    From JAB@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 14 12:41:06 2024
    The history of Arizona's Civil War-era abortion ban

    How conspiring doctors, questionable tonics, and twisted patriotism
    led to the 1864 Arizona abortion ban that was just upheld in court.
    ...
    ...
    Abortion laws of the mid-1800s were the product of discussions among
    lawyers and doctors and were designed to professionalize abortion
    services and medicine writ large --- a seemingly noble cause, but also
    one driven by physicians' self-interests and the desire to both boost
    (white) women's birth rates and weaken a nascent feminist movement.
    ...
    ...
    For much of the first half of the 19th century, there were few laws in
    the US that were specifically concerned with abortion. Rather,
    abortion was understood in the tradition of British common law: It was
    only a crime after "quickening," when a fetus's movement could be
    detected -- around four or five months of gestation. Before
    quickening, people could be ignorant (or have plausible deniability)
    about being pregnant.

    Generally, the American public at this time had few moral qualms about
    abortion before quickening. In particular, it was a service that many
    believed should be offered to unmarried women, who risked reputational
    ruin if they proceeded with the pregnancy and often came from poor
    backgrounds, as historian James Mohr writes in his 1978 book, Abortion
    in America.

    https://www.vox.com/politics/24128840/arizona-abortion-total-ban-law-roe-court-1864

    one driven by physicians' self-interests

    Still laws exist for these types (lawyers, physicians,
    optometrists...), which increases their income.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)