• a failed self-checkout experiment

    From JAB@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 24 21:16:32 2024
    Walmart removes self-checkouts and swaps back to 'traditional' lanes
    ...
    ...
    In reality, many stores are ditching self-checkout kiosks because they
    are especially vulnerable to theft, an issue which retailers claim in
    recent years have been plaguing their businesses and forcing them to
    shut locations altogether.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/consumer/article-13341161/walmart-self-checkout-removal.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Thu Apr 25 11:41:09 2024
    On Wed, 24 Apr 2024, JAB wrote:

    Walmart removes self-checkouts and swaps back to 'traditional' lanes
    ...
    ...
    In reality, many stores are ditching self-checkout kiosks because they
    are especially vulnerable to theft, an issue which retailers claim in
    recent years have been plaguing their businesses and forcing them to
    shut locations altogether.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/consumer/article-13341161/walmart-self-checkout-removal.html


    Yes, please! I hate the self checkout systems. They are so bad and it
    takes me longer than using regular checkout. Happy to see them go!

    As a technologist, I do have the suspicion though that it should be
    possible to make them into a nice experience.

    The japanese clothing store Uniqlo base their self checkout on some kind
    of low cost chip or printed tag, and apparently it has received quite high grades from their customers. Maybe that could be a good starting point for
    food store checkouts?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Thu Apr 25 05:44:03 2024
    On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:41:09 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    The japanese clothing store Uniqlo base their self checkout on some kind
    of low cost chip or printed tag, and apparently it has received quite high >grades from their customers. Maybe that could be a good starting point for >food store checkouts?

    Using barcodes is practicable and cost efficient for most grocery
    items. AI scanner might be the only solution, but if some people are
    stealing, then an AI theft 'observer' is needed.

    For years, clerks and customers have been caught stealing products.
    Walmart has cameras over each checkout lane, and they do catch their
    clerks not scanning all of the products.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Kyonshi on Thu Apr 25 11:29:36 2024
    On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:17:12 +0200, Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:

    At least that's what I came up

    Unknown what percent of "stolen" goods were unintentional acts.

    In US, a person could monitor the screen to see if an item was
    scanned, but they would have to be trained to follow this method.

    I'm not aware of a store training customers on the fine points.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Thu Apr 25 23:46:55 2024
    On Thu, 25 Apr 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:17:12 +0200, Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:

    At least that's what I came up

    Unknown what percent of "stolen" goods were unintentional acts.

    In US, a person could monitor the screen to see if an item was
    scanned, but they would have to be trained to follow this method.

    I'm not aware of a store training customers on the fine points.



    That's actually a good point. From time to time I despair of trying to
    find the exact sort of apple I took (or rather the wife took) and in the
    end I just select the apple that looks closest. I'm convinced that I, by mistake some times pay too much or too little, but fortunately no one has
    cared so far. ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jukka Lahtinen@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Fri Apr 26 23:47:19 2024
    D <nospam@example.net> writes:

    That's actually a good point. From time to time I despair of trying to
    find the exact sort of apple I took (or rather the wife took) and in
    the end I just select the apple that looks closest. I'm convinced that

    Here in Finland, we just look at the number printed on the box or shelf
    and select that number on the scale.

    --
    Jukka Lahtinen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Kyonshi on Sat Apr 27 21:31:59 2024
    On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Kyonshi wrote:

    On 4/25/2024 11:46 PM, D wrote:


    On Thu, 25 Apr 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:17:12 +0200, Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:

    At least that's what I came up

    Unknown what percent of "stolen" goods were unintentional acts.

    In US, a person could monitor the screen to see if an item was
    scanned, but they would have to be trained to follow this method.

    I'm not aware of a store training customers on the fine points.



    That's actually a good point. From time to time I despair of trying to find >> the exact sort of apple I took (or rather the wife took) and in the end I
    just select the apple that looks closest. I'm convinced that I, by mistake >> some times pay too much or too little, but fortunately no one has cared so >> far. ;)

    well, I think I most likely did choose some wrong, in one way or another. Sometimes the pictures on the screen just don't look anything like what I have in my cart. How would anyone, even someone trained on that stuff, know that I am choosing the wrong kind of produce if I am myself unsure if that was the right thing to choose?


    Oh that sounds like a great starting point for a legal process, don't you think? ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Jukka Lahtinen on Sat Apr 27 21:34:15 2024
    On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Jukka Lahtinen wrote:

    D <nospam@example.net> writes:

    That's actually a good point. From time to time I despair of trying to
    find the exact sort of apple I took (or rather the wife took) and in
    the end I just select the apple that looks closest. I'm convinced that

    Here in Finland, we just look at the number printed on the box or shelf
    and select that number on the scale.

    Sadly not in this system. Here you weigh the items at checkout, so I would
    have to walk all the way back, take a photo, walk to the check out compare
    with bad photo and so on.

    The finnish system sounds way more rock star than the systems I have used
    in various countries. I _think_ when I used to live in switzerland, ages
    ago, they had the weigh by the fruit with nr setup and you printed a bar
    code, they then scanned at check out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jukka Lahtinen@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Sun Apr 28 00:44:26 2024
    D <nospam@example.net> writes:
    On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Jukka Lahtinen wrote:
    D <nospam@example.net> writes:

    That's actually a good point. From time to time I despair of trying to
    find the exact sort of apple I took (or rather the wife took) and in
    the end I just select the apple that looks closest. I'm convinced that

    Here in Finland, we just look at the number printed on the box or shelf
    and select that number on the scale.

    Sadly not in this system. Here you weigh the items at checkout, so I
    would have to walk all the way back, take a photo, walk to the check
    out compare with bad photo and so on.

    Well, here we have the scales near the stuff to be weighed. Usually the
    nearest one is just a few steps from where you pick the goods. The
    bigger the store, the more scales they have.
    Just put the bag on the scale and select the number, you'll get the
    price sticker.

    --
    Jukka Lahtinen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jukka Lahtinen@21:1/5 to Kyonshi on Sun Apr 28 23:25:52 2024
    Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> writes:
    On 4/26/2024 10:47 PM, Jukka Lahtinen wrote:
    D <nospam@example.net> writes:

    That's actually a good point. From time to time I despair of trying to
    find the exact sort of apple I took (or rather the wife took) and in
    the end I just select the apple that looks closest. I'm convinced that
    Here in Finland, we just look at the number printed on the box or
    shelf
    and select that number on the scale.

    Yeah, but sometimes that's not easy to read either. There's three
    kinds of apple, all various kinds of red. Which one belongs to which
    price tag?

    The one with the NUMBER shown where you picked the apples, as I wrote.

    --
    Jukka Lahtinen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eli the Bearded@21:1/5 to jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid on Sun Apr 28 21:17:52 2024
    In misc.news.internet.discuss,
    Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
    The one with the NUMBER shown where you picked the apples, as I wrote.

    Are you paying for the apple where the number is shown, or do you need
    some way to transfer that number from the shelf to the cash register?

    I buy a lot of things that are "bulk" and you need to write a number
    down to transfer it from the bulk bin to the cash register, but the
    stores with that system have tags and pens in the bulk section but
    don't over in the produce section.

    Usually some percentage of larger fruit, like apples, will have stickers
    with the number, but if you only pick up one, you might get unlucky. And smaller fruit, like kumquats or strawberries (to pick things I ate
    today) will never have those stickers. Nor will lettuce or spinach.
    Onions probably will be stickered but not garlic or shallots.

    Elijah
    ------
    generally copies the number for mushrooms since he is paper bagging those

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Danart@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 29 04:10:26 2024
    JAB wrote:
    Walmart removes self-checkouts and swaps back to 'traditional'
    lanes
    ....
    ....
    In reality, many stores are ditching self-checkout kiosks because
    they
    are especially vulnerable to theft, an issue which retailers claim
    in
    recent years have been plaguing their businesses and forcing them
    to
    shut locations altogether.


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/consumer/article-13341161/walmart-self-checkout-removal.html

    Honestly
    these things are actually good where I am. I really do not see a
    problem with them at all.
    I enjoy just being able to swipe, and deposit my money.

    I honestly feel that an unpaid item might set off an alarm, as I am
    aware of that from the past. Nowadays some places have hidden alarm
    stickers on them. So it might set off ( even silent ) in another
    location. However I would feel guilty. Since the whole immigration
    thing happen, many store literally have many things on lock-down (
    like Q-tips, shaving creams, and most female items ). I guess the
    ladies are doing most of the theft.

    Walmart in the past already promoted the idea of "stealing from
    them". They literally push the idea of people openly taking
    things from the store instead of paying for them. Why? Because you
    could easily identify a particular person committing theft in other
    areas, or even match their pattern. So obviously people will steal
    things if you are promoting the idea itself.

    These checkout lanes usually should have a security guard ( even an
    under-cover one ) with glasses on ( on the chain gang ) just looking
    at specific customers. But again that bag-lady from 1974 might be up
    to something.


    This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=664206554#664206554

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Eli the Bearded on Mon Apr 29 11:43:29 2024
    On Sun, 28 Apr 2024, Eli the Bearded wrote:

    In misc.news.internet.discuss,
    Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
    The one with the NUMBER shown where you picked the apples, as I wrote.

    Are you paying for the apple where the number is shown, or do you need
    some way to transfer that number from the shelf to the cash register?

    I buy a lot of things that are "bulk" and you need to write a number
    down to transfer it from the bulk bin to the cash register, but the
    stores with that system have tags and pens in the bulk section but
    don't over in the produce section.

    Usually some percentage of larger fruit, like apples, will have stickers
    with the number, but if you only pick up one, you might get unlucky. And smaller fruit, like kumquats or strawberries (to pick things I ate
    today) will never have those stickers. Nor will lettuce or spinach.
    Onions probably will be stickered but not garlic or shallots.

    Elijah
    ------
    generally copies the number for mushrooms since he is paper bagging those


    I'm not Jukka, but in a similar system I experienced in switzerland you
    would print out a bar code sticker which you would attache on the platic
    bag that contains the apples you wanted to buy. So the scenario would go
    like this. 1. Select N apples from the section marked with "4". Put apples
    in plastic bag. Weigh plastic bag on scale and press "4". Bar code sticker
    will be printed, and this sticker is attached to the plastic bag.

    Upon checkout, the cashier would scan the bar code and the correct price
    would be shown.

    I imagine the finnish system works kind of similar.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Kyonshi on Mon Apr 29 11:40:21 2024
    On Sun, 28 Apr 2024, Kyonshi wrote:

    On 4/27/2024 9:31 PM, D wrote:


    On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Kyonshi wrote:

    On 4/25/2024 11:46 PM, D wrote:


    On Thu, 25 Apr 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:17:12 +0200, Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    At least that's what I came up

    Unknown what percent of "stolen" goods were unintentional acts.

    In US, a person could monitor the screen to see if an item was
    scanned, but they would have to be trained to follow this method.

    I'm not aware of a store training customers on the fine points.



    That's actually a good point. From time to time I despair of trying to >>>> find the exact sort of apple I took (or rather the wife took) and in the >>>> end I just select the apple that looks closest. I'm convinced that I, by >>>> mistake some times pay too much or too little, but fortunately no one has >>>> cared so far. ;)

    well, I think I most likely did choose some wrong, in one way or another. >>> Sometimes the pictures on the screen just don't look anything like what I >>> have in my cart. How would anyone, even someone trained on that stuff,
    know that I am choosing the wrong kind of produce if I am myself unsure if >>> that was the right thing to choose?


    Oh that sounds like a great starting point for a legal process, don't you
    think? ;)

    you mean as a defense? yeah. if there's no reasonable way even a trained person would be able to make that distinction, how is a customer supposed to know how it works?


    Exactly!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anssi Saari@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Mon Apr 29 14:38:48 2024
    D <nospam@example.net> writes:

    I imagine the finnish system works kind of similar.

    Yes, at least it used to. These days we're moving towards scanning the
    barcodes ourselves and self service checkouts. Finland is really in with
    self service for most things so this setup will likely spread.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Danart on Mon Apr 29 13:13:34 2024
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 04:10:26 +0000,
    danmin@danminart-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Danart) wrote:

    These checkout lanes

    Training...today, an older female was learning how to be a checkout
    clerk. Well, for years, she has seen bagging done, but she had to be
    told to keep the cold items separated out, and sacked together.

    For self-checkout lanes, some of this "stealing" may be nothing more
    than an ignorant shopper.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)