XPost: alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns, free.tampon.tim.walz
"bunford" <
bunford6y@amazon.com> wrote in message news:vbe0uc$9s6i$
1@news.mixmin.net...
On 9/5/2024 11:01 AM, % wrote:
lefty nuts wrote:
It's not going to work.
She gets dumber every time she opens her mouth and takes a breath.
its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents
and we all think what we do has major significants
So you're voting for Kamala?
One question, as VP she had, under the constitution only a very few limited duties
President of the Senate
handle Impeachment Trials
Deal with Electoral vote count
Take over as President
Advise the President
So let's she how she did, on her job
Preside over the Senate - Absent 55% of the time
Impeachment - None
Electoral vote counts - None
Acting President - No
Principle advisor to the President - if she did, it was a lot of bad advise.
So knowing nothing else, just from these numbers, how would we rate an
employee that was absent over half the time for their main task and didn't
do anything else that was part of the job?
It has nothing to do with politics.. it's just a simple question concerning
job performance.
You say, as VP she had a lot of other things going on...
Except her performance in her prior offices showed a similar dereliction of duty and generally poor performance.
So why would we, should we, expect anything else but more of the same lackluster, do nothing, performance as President?
Heck, right now she's pretending to be on her book, apparently a cell phone doesn't make enough of a statement. rather than talk to reporters.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)