1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. MISC.NEWS.INTERNET.DISCUS

  • strict abortion laws lead to 'predictable' suffering for women

    From JAB@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 20 22:50:55 2024
    Harris says strict abortion laws lead to 'predictable' suffering for
    women

    MSNBC
    VP Harris on deaths linked to Georgia abortion ban: 'Trump is the
    architect of this crisis'
    ===========================================

    strict abortion laws lead to 'predictable' suffering for women

    Old news....ask Margaret Sanger
    (September 14, 1879 - September 6, 1966)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Sat Sep 21 12:11:10 2024
    On Fri, 20 Sep 2024, JAB wrote:

    Harris says strict abortion laws lead to 'predictable' suffering for
    women

    MSNBC
    VP Harris on deaths linked to Georgia abortion ban: 'Trump is the
    architect of this crisis'
    ===========================================

    strict abortion laws lead to 'predictable' suffering for women

    Old news....ask Margaret Sanger
    (September 14, 1879 - September 6, 1966)


    You might find it strange, coming from a guy like me, but abortion is one
    of the questions where I am fully in agreement with the democrats and
    against Trump. It is not, however, an important question for me, so I have
    to go for team Trump adding up all the questions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Sat Sep 21 06:50:47 2024
    On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 12:11:10 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    It is not, however, an important question for me,

    As SCOTUS said in Roe v. Wade,
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
    religious doctrine is divided on this question.

    A few religious originations want to shove their agenda upon all,

    for me

    Irrelevant viewpoint....this ignores female consequences. In a reverse perspective, sort of like saying no to gun regulation

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Sat Sep 21 23:04:03 2024
    On Sat, 21 Sep 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 12:11:10 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    It is not, however, an important question for me,

    As SCOTUS said in Roe v. Wade,
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
    religious doctrine is divided on this question.

    A few religious originations want to shove their agenda upon all,

    for me

    Irrelevant viewpoint....this ignores female consequences. In a reverse perspective, sort of like saying no to gun regulation


    Disagree. It is not irrelevant to me. It is my opinion, I am entitled to
    it, and if I say that an opinion is important to me, it is, regardless of
    what you might think about it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Sun Sep 22 06:02:46 2024
    On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:04:03 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Irrelevant viewpoint....this ignores female consequences. In a reverse
    perspective, sort of like saying no to gun regulation


    Disagree. It is not irrelevant to me. It is my opinion, I am entitled to
    it, and if I say that an opinion is important to me, it is, regardless of >what you might think about it.

    As long as your moral underpinnings are not in conflict...there's the
    rub. For instance, if a person would vote for candidate A, who is a
    sexual predator, then they would not object if their daughter had an
    "affair" with this person.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to pursent100@gmail.com on Sun Sep 22 10:22:34 2024
    On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 06:03:32 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:

    Disagree. It is not irrelevant to me. It is my opinion, I am entitled to >>> it, and if I say that an opinion is important to me, it is, regardless of >>> what you might think about it.

    As long as your moral underpinnings are not in conflict...there's the
    rub. For instance, if a person would vote for candidate A, who is a
    sexual predator, then they would not object if their daughter had an
    "affair" with this person.


    is that what you did

    No, but Republicans are OK with it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Sun Sep 22 21:44:24 2024
    On Sun, 22 Sep 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:04:03 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Irrelevant viewpoint....this ignores female consequences. In a reverse
    perspective, sort of like saying no to gun regulation


    Disagree. It is not irrelevant to me. It is my opinion, I am entitled to
    it, and if I say that an opinion is important to me, it is, regardless of
    what you might think about it.

    As long as your moral underpinnings are not in conflict...there's the
    rub. For instance, if a person would vote for candidate A, who is a
    sexual predator, then they would not object if their daughter had an
    "affair" with this person.


    Yes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Retrograde@21:1/5 to JAB on Tue Sep 24 21:13:36 2024
    On 2024-09-21, JAB <here@is.invalid> wrote:
    Harris says strict abortion laws lead to 'predictable' suffering for
    women

    MSNBC
    VP Harris on deaths linked to Georgia abortion ban: 'Trump is the
    architect of this crisis'
    ===========================================

    strict abortion laws lead to 'predictable' suffering for women

    Old news....ask Margaret Sanger
    (September 14, 1879 - September 6, 1966)

    well then ladies, vote for the party that opposed this kind of bullshit.

    I'm no fan of abortion, but this situation was the consequence of poor
    voting choices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)