• House Republicans Give Trump the Finger

    From JAB@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 20 14:36:25 2024
    38 House Republicans Give Trump the Finger in Shutdown Vote

    A government shutdown is looking increasingly likely after an
    embarrassing number of House GOP rebels bucked Donald Trump Thursday
    night.

    A bill that Trump had demanded--which included raising the debt
    limit--went down in flames on the House floor with 38 Republicans
    joining Democrats to oppose it. Trump killed House Speaker Mike
    Johnson's initial bipartisan plan, which was expected to easily coast
    through Congress despite facing backlash from conservatives.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/38-house-republicans-give-trump-the-finger-in-shutdown-vote/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Fri Dec 20 22:40:30 2024
    On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, JAB wrote:

    38 House Republicans Give Trump the Finger in Shutdown Vote

    A government shutdown is looking increasingly likely after an
    embarrassing number of House GOP rebels bucked Donald Trump Thursday
    night.

    A bill that Trump had demanded--which included raising the debt
    limit--went down in flames on the House floor with 38 Republicans
    joining Democrats to oppose it. Trump killed House Speaker Mike
    Johnson's initial bipartisan plan, which was expected to easily coast
    through Congress despite facing backlash from conservatives.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/38-house-republicans-give-trump-the-finger-in-shutdown-vote/


    This is not respectful! Our king and lord will punish them severely!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Fri Dec 20 19:46:05 2024
    On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 22:40:30 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Our king and lord will punish them severely!

    Who?

    President Musk https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbaa66720-b212-4089-acaa-83c7665a20c6_2302x1512.jpeg

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Auric Hellman on Sat Dec 21 12:28:19 2024
    On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, Auric Hellman wrote:

    On 12/20/2024 8:46 PM, JAB wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 22:40:30 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Our king and lord will punish them severely!

    Who?

    President Musk
    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbaa66720-b212-4089-acaa-83c7665a20c6_2302x1512.jpeg


    Once Trump realizes that the public perceives Elon Musk as the "shadow President', he will find a way to severe ties with him. Trump's ego will never allow a co-equal.

    And let's not forget the ego of Musk! I see it as obvious and inevitable
    that the two will eventually clash. Then there will be beautiful
    fireworks!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Sat Dec 21 12:27:31 2024
    On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 22:40:30 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Our king and lord will punish them severely!

    Who?

    President Musk https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbaa66720-b212-4089-acaa-83c7665a20c6_2302x1512.jpeg

    Oh, you're a Musk-man? I can live with that! ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Itchy@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Sat Dec 21 14:44:41 2024
    On Dec 21, 2024 at 06:28:19 EST, "D" <nospam@example.net> wrote:



    On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, Auric Hellman wrote:

    On 12/20/2024 8:46 PM, JAB wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 22:40:30 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Our king and lord will punish them severely!

    Who?

    President Musk
    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbaa66720-b212-4089-acaa-83c7665a20c6_2302x1512.jpeg


    Once Trump realizes that the public perceives Elon Musk as the "shadow
    President', he will find a way to severe ties with him. Trump's ego will
    never allow a co-equal.

    And let's not forget the ego of Musk! I see it as obvious and inevitable
    that the two will eventually clash. Then there will be beautiful
    fireworks!

    I thought the same thing when I was watching this week !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Sat Dec 21 18:51:27 2024
    On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 12:28:19 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Musk

    He doesn't understand the consequences of cutting this/that.

    =============================================

    Elon Musk told a cheering crowd at Sunday's MAGA rally in New York
    that if Donald Trump puts him in charge of government efficiency, as
    planned, he can cut "at least $2 trillion" from the current federal
    budget.

    And that can only mean one of two things.

    Either Donald Trump and Elon Musk are planning to cut 85% of all
    spending on highways, disaster relief, federal bank-deposit insurance
    and the departments of Agriculture, Homeland Security and Justice;
    close all U.S. embassies; and abolish the Environmental Protection
    Agency, the Small Business Administration, NASA and nearly all
    welfare, income-support, food-stamp and childhood-nutrition programs.

    Or they are planning on cutting Social Security and Medicare --
    despite Donald Trump's protests to the contrary.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/if-musk-and-trump-want-to-cut-federal-spending-by-2-trillion-theyll-have-to-come-for-social-security-and-medicare-36450c5f

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Spencer@21:1/5 to JAB on Sun Dec 22 02:15:33 2024
    JAB <here@is.invalid> writes:

    On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 12:28:19 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Musk

    He doesn't understand the consequences of cutting this/that.


    In any case, the Grace commission's failure taught everyone serious
    about the budget, liberal or conservative, an important lesson:
    Anyone who proposes saving lots of taxpayer money by eliminating
    "waste, fraud and abuse" should be ignored, because the very
    use of the phrase shows that they have no idea what they're talking
    about.

    -- https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/the-fraudulence-of-waste-fraud-and

    =============================================

    Elon Musk told a cheering crowd at Sunday's MAGA rally in New York
    that if Donald Trump puts him in charge of government efficiency, as
    planned, he can cut "at least $2 trillion" from the current federal
    budget.

    And that can only mean one of two things.

    Either Donald Trump and Elon Musk are planning to cut 85% of all
    spending on highways, disaster relief, federal bank-deposit insurance
    and the departments of Agriculture, Homeland Security and Justice;
    close all U.S. embassies; and abolish the Environmental Protection
    Agency, the Small Business Administration, NASA and nearly all
    welfare, income-support, food-stamp and childhood-nutrition programs.

    Or they are planning on cutting Social Security and Medicare --
    despite Donald Trump's protests to the contrary.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/if-musk-and-trump-want-to-cut-federal-spending-by-2-trillion-theyll-have-to-come-for-social-security-and-medicare-36450c5f


    --
    Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Sun Dec 22 12:33:07 2024
    On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 12:28:19 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Musk

    He doesn't understand the consequences of cutting this/that.

    =============================================

    Elon Musk told a cheering crowd at Sunday's MAGA rally in New York
    that if Donald Trump puts him in charge of government efficiency, as
    planned, he can cut "at least $2 trillion" from the current federal
    budget.

    And that can only mean one of two things.

    Either Donald Trump and Elon Musk are planning to cut 85% of all
    spending on highways, disaster relief, federal bank-deposit insurance
    and the departments of Agriculture, Homeland Security and Justice;
    close all U.S. embassies; and abolish the Environmental Protection
    Agency, the Small Business Administration, NASA and nearly all
    welfare, income-support, food-stamp and childhood-nutrition programs.

    Or they are planning on cutting Social Security and Medicare --
    despite Donald Trump's protests to the contrary.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/if-musk-and-trump-want-to-cut-federal-spending-by-2-trillion-theyll-have-to-come-for-social-security-and-medicare-36450c5f

    Let's just conclude, a lot of cutting. And this is good! US will become
    more libertarian, and mroe free, and the people will rejoice! =D

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Sun Dec 22 07:20:42 2024
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 12:33:07 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Let's just conclude, a lot of cutting. And this is good!

    Consequences - "The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
    is projected to make up 84% of the current Farm Bill's budget."

    Wiki - In the United States, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
    Program, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program, is a federal
    government program that provides food-purchasing assistance for low-
    and no-income persons to help them maintain adequate nutrition and
    health
    =================

    Via Mike's cite

    "... But most government spending happens because it delivers
    something people want, and you can't make significant cuts without
    hard choices.

    Furthermore, the notion that businessmen have skills that readily
    translate into managing the government is all wrong. Business and
    government serve different purposes and require different mindsets."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Sun Dec 22 21:45:29 2024
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 12:33:07 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Let's just conclude, a lot of cutting. And this is good!

    Consequences - "The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
    is projected to make up 84% of the current Farm Bill's budget."

    Wiki - In the United States, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
    Program, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program, is a federal
    government program that provides food-purchasing assistance for low-
    and no-income persons to help them maintain adequate nutrition and
    health
    =================

    Via Mike's cite

    "... But most government spending happens because it delivers
    something people want, and you can't make significant cuts without
    hard choices.

    Furthermore, the notion that businessmen have skills that readily
    translate into managing the government is all wrong. Business and
    government serve different purposes and require different mindsets."

    This is incorrect. Government is based on violence, and is no different
    from a criminal gang. Government serves itself, and is a parasite on
    productive people.

    Businesses serve the needs of the people on the free market based on free, informed consent.

    Therefore the only ethical system of governance is based on business, and customers, and therefore, businessmen are really the philosopher kings of plato.

    In contrast, proffesional politicians are tyrants, thugs and criminals and
    have no business governing anything. They are pure destruction.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Sun Dec 22 14:51:32 2024
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 21:45:29 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Businesses serve the needs of the people

    Businesses serve the needs of its shareholders...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Mon Dec 23 13:06:36 2024
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 21:45:29 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    Businesses serve the needs of the people

    Businesses serve the needs of its shareholders...


    So they are not people? Businesses serve the needs of its customers. If it doesn't, there won't be anything for the shareholders. Customers are
    primary, shareholder second. Both customers and share holders are people,
    ergo "the people".

    Add to that, that anyone can become a customer or a shareholder, compared
    with nations who limit membership based on arbitrary things such as birth
    or ancestry.

    So even there, business is democratic, and government is authoritarian and anti-democratic.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Mon Dec 23 10:56:58 2024
    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 13:06:36 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    So they are not people? Businesses serve the needs of...

    Dodge v. Ford Motor Co

    Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich 459; 170 NW 668 (1919),[1] is a case
    in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to
    operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders,
    rather than in a manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Mon Dec 23 22:22:55 2024
    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 13:06:36 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

    So they are not people? Businesses serve the needs of...

    Dodge v. Ford Motor Co

    Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich 459; 170 NW 668 (1919),[1] is a case
    in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to
    operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders,
    rather than in a manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.


    Hah! What do I care? The supreme court is an errand boy of the parasite we
    call the government. The government thrives on sucking out the life force
    of the people to further its own ends.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)