• Trump wants to control the courts

    From Eli the Bearded@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 3 22:29:30 2025
    The subject line should surprise no one. The methods, however, should:
    suing John Roberts.

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-allies-sue-john-roberts-to-give-white-house-control-of-court-system

    In a little-noticed lawsuit filed last week, the America First Legal
    Foundation sued Chief Justice John Roberts and the head of the
    Administrative Office of U.S. Courts.

    The case ostensibly proceeds as a FOIA lawsuit, with the
    Trump-aligned group seeking access to judiciary records. But, in
    doing so, it asks the courts to cede massive power to the White
    House: the bodies that make court policy and manage the judiciary's
    day-to-day operations should be considered independent agencies of
    the executive branch, the suit argues, giving the President, under
    the conservative legal movement's theories, the power to appoint and
    dismiss people in key roles.

    ...

    "To the extent this lawsuit has any value other than clickbait,
    maybe the underlying message is, we will let our imaginations run
    wild," Peter M. Shane, a constitutional law scholar at NYU Law
    School, told TPM. "The Trump administration and the MAGA community
    will let our imaginations run wild in our attempts to figure out
    ways to make the life of the judiciary miserable, to the extent you
    push back against Trump."

    ...

    Legal experts suggested to TPM that the FOIA piece is something of a
    trojan horse. The Judicial Conference and Administrative Office's
    denial of the FOIA request provides standing to sue, and thereby ask
    a federal judge to declare that the two judicial bodies "are subject
    to the FOIA as independent agencies within the executive branch."

    In terms of importance, a judge finding that core parts of the
    judiciary are independent agencies of the executive branch would
    dwarf any FOIA material America First Legal might receive. The
    lawsuit itself seems to acknowledge this. At one point, in language
    channeling that of a protection racket, America First Legal observes
    that "Federal courts rely on the executive branch for facility
    management and security. Federal judges, as officers of the courts,
    need resources to fulfill their constitutional obligations."

    Lawsuit:

    https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.279777/gov.uscourts.dcd.279777.1.0.pdf

    Right off the bat it claims senators have "falsely" accused justices
    Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito of "ethical improprieties" so you can
    smell the bias coming off the paper.

    Elijah
    ------
    these people value Party Loyalty much more than the Constitution

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to *@eli.users.panix.com on Sat May 3 18:59:17 2025
    On Sat, 3 May 2025 22:29:30 -0000 (UTC), Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote:

    these people value Party Loyalty much more than the Constitution

    Correction - These people value a single Party Loyalty

    You are either with us, or against us....Either you are with us, or
    you are with the terrorists.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_are_either_with_us,_or_against_us

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)