So let me get this straight: the "party of the working class" is
kicking millions of people off health care to fund tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the rich?
https://bsky.app/profile/rbreich.bsky.social/post/3lq6d2xkd3i2l
On Tue, 27 May 2025 20:02:12 -0500
JAB <here@is.invalid> wrote:
So let me get this straight: the "party of the working class" is
kicking millions of people off health care to fund tax cuts that
disproportionately benefit the rich?
https://bsky.app/profile/rbreich.bsky.social/post/3lq6d2xkd3i2l
Don't forget the punchline: the poor fuckers voted for this! They
chose it!
Fuck your health care. Die young, you deserve it you stupid shitpiles.
No medicaid for you - suffer because you're too poor to buy meds, and
voted for the team who promised during the campaign they would take
things from you.
Retrograde wrote:
Fuck your health care. Die young, you deserve it you stupid shitpiles.
No medicaid for you - suffer because you're too poor to buy meds, and
voted for the team who promised during the campaign they would take
things from you.
You have nothing to offer except profanity and vulgarity.
I hope you're disappeared by the Trump administration.
On Tue, 27 May 2025 23:20:08 -0400
Usenet Lurker <nobody@none.nowhere> wrote:
Retrograde wrote:
Fuck your health care. Die young, you deserve it you stupid shitpiles.
No medicaid for you - suffer because you're too poor to buy meds, and
voted for the team who promised during the campaign they would take
things from you.
You have nothing to offer except profanity and vulgarity.
I hope you're disappeared by the Trump administration.
Please accept my profound apology for the words that offended your
sensitive virgin ears, you poor delicate snowflake.
I'll ignore the death threat; too busy laughing that a former gameshow
host convinced an entire class of Americans to vote against their best interests while wearing stupid hats.
....and who are you to tell others what their "best interests"
are?
entire class of Americans to vote against their best
interests while wearing stupid hats.
I'll ignore the death threat; too busy laughing that a former gameshow
host convinced an entire class of Americans to vote against their best interests while wearing stupid hats.
Not a threat, and who are you to tell others what their "best interests"
are?
On Wed, 28 May 2025 23:00:37 -0400
Usenet Lurker <nobody@none.nowhere> wrote:
I'll ignore the death threat; too busy laughing that a former gameshow
host convinced an entire class of Americans to vote against their best
interests while wearing stupid hats.
Not a threat, and who are you to tell others what their "best interests"
are?
I'm no one at all! So it's simple: if Joe Average American has
decided it's in his interest to have less access to affordable
healthcare, pay higher prices for everything he buys, a federal deficit rising faster than ever before,
and wants to give the struggling
billionaire class a chance to pay even less taxes than they already do,
then rock on, he knows what he wants and deserves to get it good and
hard!
Scroll up to the top of this thread to see where we began. Poor
fucking Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk get to pay less taxes, and Joe's
diabetes meds are going to run him hundreds of bucks per month more.
And here you are to defend it.
On Wed, 28 May 2025 23:00:37 -0400, Usenet Lurker
<nobody@none.nowhere> wrote:
....and who are you to tell others what their "best interests"
are?
Religious sector does this all the time...you didn't know?
The religious sector doesn't force anyone to fund them.
What have you advocated for that would fix the medical system, which is the root cause of these problems? Oh, and "single payer" isn't a solution.
On Sat, 31 May 2025 17:56:44 -0400
Usenet Lurker <nobody@none.nowhere> wrote:
What have you advocated for that would fix the medical system, which is the >> root cause of these problems? Oh, and "single payer" isn't a solution.
Search this NG on my name and you will find I have consistently argued
that Left vs Right is a distraction that keeps the masses occuppied
long enough for the wealthy to make off with the loot. The real fight
here is everyone vs the billionaires, and they are keeping us
consistently sidetracked arguing about bullshit while they steal the
world.
On Sat, 31 May 2025 17:57:13 -0400, Usenet Lurker
<nobody@none.nowhere> wrote:
The religious sector doesn't force anyone to fund them.
Getting non-profit status means taxpayers are funding them.
They don't build/maintained roadways adjacent to their building(s).
So, a loss of property taxes, and roadway expenses.
If you're going to tax the churches, then we get to tax all the leftist >foundations and non-profits.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 19:21:29 |
| Calls: | 10,389 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,960 |