• Passcode vulnerability means you can be permanently locked out of your

    From Chris@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 19 22:23:05 2023
    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode. https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide them your passcode.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Wed Apr 19 19:35:20 2023
    On 2023-04-19 18:23, Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode. https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide them your passcode.


    This is an extension of the story last month (or so) where people lurk
    and get your passcode prior to stealing your phone. Indeed the WSJ have updated the story recently with how hard it can be to recover your account.

    In these cases people tend to have easy "to gather by lurking" passcodes
    (4 digit) and of course be more careful with their phones when out and
    about.


    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Wed Apr 19 19:37:35 2023
    On 2023-04-19 19:25, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by
    having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose
    access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or
    provide
    them your passcode.


    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    Fix what?

    Patch what?

    If I lose control of the the keys to my car I can't really complain much
    if someone steals it and sends it off to Africa.


    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to Chris on Wed Apr 19 18:25:29 2023
    Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode. https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide them your passcode.


    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 00:13:37 2023
    On 2023-04-19, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 19:25, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by
    having their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can
    irreversibly lose access to your AppleID with a thief only needing
    your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or
    provide them your passcode.

    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    Fix what?

    Patch what?

    If I lose control of the the keys to my car I can't really complain much
    if someone steals it and sends it off to Africa.

    Toyota shouldn't make it so easy for people to steal your keys when you
    aren't paying attention! /s

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to hank@nospam.invalid on Wed Apr 19 21:07:36 2023
    In article <QL_%L.331231$ZhSc.277622@fx38.iad>, Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid> wrote:


    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.

    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-p
    assword-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide them your passcode.


    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    in fact, they do.

    according to anonymous sources deep within the supply chain, apple will
    include two blindfolds beginning with the iphone 15 to be distributed
    to people nearby so that they cannot see passcodes or any other user
    action. blindfolds will be available for existing iphone owners and
    there will be an option to add a custom emoji.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 06:36:03 2023
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 18:23, Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having >> their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access >> to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide >> them your passcode.


    This is an extension of the story last month (or so) where people lurk
    and get your passcode prior to stealing your phone. Indeed the WSJ have updated the story recently with how hard it can be to recover your account.

    Not just hard, impossible.

    In these cases people tend to have easy "to gather by lurking" passcodes
    (4 digit) and of course be more careful with their phones when out and
    about.

    The issue is that Apple shouldn't allow you to change your AppleID password
    or reset a recovery key with only your passcode.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to nospam on Thu Apr 20 06:36:04 2023
    nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    In article <QL_%L.331231$ZhSc.277622@fx38.iad>, Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid> wrote:


    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having >>> their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access >>> to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.

    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-p
    assword-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide >>> them your passcode.


    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    in fact, they do.

    according to anonymous sources deep within the supply chain, apple will include two blindfolds beginning with the iphone 15 to be distributed
    to people nearby so that they cannot see passcodes or any other user
    action. blindfolds will be available for existing iphone owners and
    there will be an option to add a custom emoji.

    Your snark didn't acknowledge the seriousness of the issue.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 06:41:05 2023
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 19:25, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by
    having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose
    access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or
    provide
    them your passcode.


    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    Fix what?

    Patch what?

    It's a serious vulnerability. A thief shouldn't be able to permanently lock
    you out of your account with only the passcode. Given that everywhere else
    has MFA why doesn't this critical step have it?

    If I lose control of the the keys to my car I can't really complain much
    if someone steals it and sends it off to Africa.

    Nice story.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 08:48:41 2023
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode. https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones,
    iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Joerg Lorenz on Thu Apr 20 07:52:00 2023
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having >> their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access >> to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide >> them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones,
    iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    As you well know iOS (and macOS) forces you to use your passcode/password
    on a regular basis. Plus, there's the multitude of times that Face ID
    doesn't work and you need to resort to passcode.

    What do you suggest people do? Not pay for the tank fuel they've just put
    in the car or the meal they've just eaten?

    Do none of you live in the real world?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilf@21:1/5 to Wilf on Thu Apr 20 08:34:56 2023
    On 20/04/2023 at 08:32, Wilf wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 at 07:36, Chris wrote:


    The issue is that Apple shouldn't allow you to change your AppleID password >> or reset a recovery key with only your passcode.



    I think that is the crucial point.



    ... although of course the other factors in MFA would likely involve the
    same phone receiving a texted code or email with a code in it. That
    wouldn't actually help in such a case.

    --
    Wilf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Wilf on Thu Apr 20 07:52:00 2023
    Wilf <wilf@postingx.uk> wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 at 08:32, Wilf wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 at 07:36, Chris wrote:


    The issue is that Apple shouldn't allow you to change your AppleID password >>> or reset a recovery key with only your passcode.



    I think that is the crucial point.



    ... although of course the other factors in MFA would likely involve the
    same phone receiving a texted code or email with a code in it. That wouldn't actually help in such a case.

    Indeed but there will be other ways to solve the issue.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilf@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 08:32:00 2023
    On 20/04/2023 at 07:36, Chris wrote:


    The issue is that Apple shouldn't allow you to change your AppleID password or reset a recovery key with only your passcode.



    I think that is the crucial point.


    --
    Wilf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 13:48:57 2023
    Am 20.04.23 um 09:52 schrieb Chris:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones,
    iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    As you well know iOS (and macOS) forces you to use your passcode/password
    on a regular basis. Plus, there's the multitude of times that Face ID
    doesn't work and you need to resort to passcode.

    Not really the case here. iOS is not Android.

    What do you suggest people do? Not pay for the tank fuel they've just put
    in the car or the meal they've just eaten?

    Do none of you live in the real world?

    Obviously more than others.

    --
    Gutta cavat lapidem (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 13:50:10 2023
    Am 20.04.23 um 09:32 schrieb Wilf:
    On 20/04/2023 at 07:36, Chris wrote:


    The issue is that Apple shouldn't allow you to change your AppleID password >> or reset a recovery key with only your passcode.



    I think that is the crucial point.

    I do not think it is. The problem is not at the end of the chain it sits
    at the beginning.

    --
    Gutta cavat lapidem (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 08:52:25 2023
    On 2023-04-20 02:36, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 18:23, Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having >>> their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access >>> to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide >>> them your passcode.


    This is an extension of the story last month (or so) where people lurk
    and get your passcode prior to stealing your phone. Indeed the WSJ have
    updated the story recently with how hard it can be to recover your account.

    Not just hard, impossible.

    In these cases people tend to have easy "to gather by lurking" passcodes
    (4 digit) and of course be more careful with their phones when out and
    about.

    The issue is that Apple shouldn't allow you to change your AppleID password or reset a recovery key with only your passcode.

    If people would have more robust passcodes, protect the entry of it
    (when in bars, etc), protect their phone from theft, then such would not
    occur.

    Apple _could_ make account recovery easier if it would allow the
    registration of government issued ID. Then one could use that to
    recover accounts.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 08:56:37 2023
    On 2023-04-20 02:41, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 19:25, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by
    having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose
    access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or
    provide
    them your passcode.


    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    Fix what?

    Patch what?

    It's a serious vulnerability. A thief shouldn't be able to permanently lock you out of your account with only the passcode. Given that everywhere else has MFA why doesn't this critical step have it?

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code that he picked up looking
    over your shoulder before taking the phone you cavalierly left on the
    bar, he'd get the MFA on the very same phone ... pretty useless.

    See my other reply.

    If I lose control of the the keys to my car I can't really complain much
    if someone steals it and sends it off to Africa.

    Nice story.

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves -
    although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Wilf on Thu Apr 20 08:59:00 2023
    On 2023-04-20 03:32, Wilf wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 at 07:36, Chris wrote:


    The issue is that Apple shouldn't allow you to change your AppleID
    password
    or reset a recovery key with only your passcode.



    I think that is the crucial point.

    7 3 2 8

    Wow. What a passcode. Nobody could ever pick that up looking over your shoulder before his buddy steals your phone off of the bar.

    Mitigations:
    - better codes (longer, more complex)
    - hide it when entering it in public places
    - don't leave your phone on the bar because it's so cool.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Wilf on Thu Apr 20 09:00:24 2023
    On 2023-04-20 03:34, Wilf wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 at 08:32, Wilf wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 at 07:36, Chris wrote:


    The issue is that Apple shouldn't allow you to change your AppleID
    password
    or reset a recovery key with only your passcode.



    I think that is the crucial point.



    ... although of course the other factors in MFA would likely involve the
    same phone receiving a texted code or email with a code in it.   That wouldn't actually help in such a case.

    Once the thief has the phone with the orig. code he's receiving the MFA
    on that phone a well.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 13:26:53 2023
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 02:36, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 18:23, Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having >>>> their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide
    them your passcode.


    This is an extension of the story last month (or so) where people lurk
    and get your passcode prior to stealing your phone. Indeed the WSJ have >>> updated the story recently with how hard it can be to recover your account. >>
    Not just hard, impossible.

    In these cases people tend to have easy "to gather by lurking" passcodes >>> (4 digit) and of course be more careful with their phones when out and
    about.

    The issue is that Apple shouldn't allow you to change your AppleID password >> or reset a recovery key with only your passcode.

    If people would have more robust passcodes, protect the entry of it
    (when in bars, etc), protect their phone from theft, then such would not occur.

    Nice victim blaming.

    Apple encourages users to integrate everything into icloud, so it must not
    be vulnerable to a single point of failure. The onus is on them to ensure
    that users' precious data is safe.

    It won't affect me as I don't use it, but it is a serious flaw. Not sure
    why you don't think it is.

    Apple _could_ make account recovery easier if it would allow the
    registration of government issued ID. Then one could use that to
    recover accounts.

    Wouldn't work as the thief could replace your ID with theirs. Just like the recovery key.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 13:20:53 2023
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 02:41, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 19:25, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by
    having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose >>>>> access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or
    provide
    them your passcode.


    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    Fix what?

    Patch what?

    It's a serious vulnerability. A thief shouldn't be able to permanently lock >> you out of your account with only the passcode. Given that everywhere else >> has MFA why doesn't this critical step have it?

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    that he picked up looking
    over your shoulder before taking the phone you cavalierly left on the
    bar, he'd get the MFA on the very same phone ... pretty useless.

    There's other options. A company as clever as Apple should be able to sort
    it out.

    See my other reply.

    If I lose control of the the keys to my car I can't really complain much >>> if someone steals it and sends it off to Africa.

    Nice story.

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves - although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too.

    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having
    access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set of car keys.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 09:43:09 2023
    On 2023-04-20 03:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having >>> their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access >>> to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide >>> them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones,
    iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    There are unforced errors and forced errors.

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY
    2) Hide the code while entering it in public: EASY-PEASY
    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool: DUH!

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Joerg Lorenz on Thu Apr 20 13:30:30 2023
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 09:52 schrieb Chris:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones,
    iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    As you well know iOS (and macOS) forces you to use your passcode/password
    on a regular basis. Plus, there's the multitude of times that Face ID
    doesn't work and you need to resort to passcode.

    Not really the case here.

    Am happy for you. Definitely the case here. As a family with iphones we
    often look at each other's phones and therefore triggers the passcode
    request or Faceid just doesn't work if the phone is lying flat on a table
    or you're too much of an angle to it or etc etc.

    iOS is not Android.

    Well d'uh!

    What do you suggest people do? Not pay for the tank fuel they've just put
    in the car or the meal they've just eaten?

    Are you able to address this or not? It's very easy to be glib without
    actually helping.

    Do none of you live in the real world?

    Obviously more than others.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 09:48:18 2023
    In article <u1re7l$k0ru$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during the
    day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked with face
    id or touch id.

    second, a passcode is required approximately *once* *a* *week*,
    depending on various factors. this is by design so that using a long
    passcode is a realistic option.

    third, a long *numeric* passcode is more than sufficient to prevent
    casual shoulder-surfing and is very easy to tap in since a numeric
    keypad will appear versus a keyboard. 10 digits should suffice, but
    longer is obviously more secure. a phone number that is not associated
    with the user works well, such as one from childhood.

    another advantage is that there is no indication as to how many digits
    it actually is, so anyone who does manage to watch it being tapped in
    won't know if they missed a digit or have one too many.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 09:48:24 2023
    On 2023-04-20 09:20, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 02:41, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 19:25, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by >>>>>> having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose >>>>>> access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or >>>>>> provide
    them your passcode.


    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    Fix what?

    Patch what?

    It's a serious vulnerability. A thief shouldn't be able to permanently lock >>> you out of your account with only the passcode. Given that everywhere else >>> has MFA why doesn't this critical step have it?

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    Mine is 10 mixed chars. OTOH, I use FaceID to open the phone.

    1Password password is longer - so they can't get at my bank account app
    if they manage to hold me down and get my FaceID.

    At that point it's rubber house decryption.

    that he picked up looking
    over your shoulder before taking the phone you cavalierly left on the
    bar, he'd get the MFA on the very same phone ... pretty useless.

    There's other options. A company as clever as Apple should be able to sort
    it out.

    See my other reply.

    If I lose control of the the keys to my car I can't really complain much >>>> if someone steals it and sends it off to Africa.

    Nice story.

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves -
    although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too.

    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having
    access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set of car keys.

    Irrelevant to you because it pisses all over your case.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to nospam on Thu Apr 20 10:07:17 2023
    On 2023-04-20 10:01, nospam wrote:
    In article <Job0M.336707$ZhSc.123554@fx38.iad>, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    At that point it's rubber house decryption.

    people in rubber houses shouldn't throw stones.

    Doh!

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to bitbucket@blackhole.com on Thu Apr 20 10:01:15 2023
    In article <Job0M.336707$ZhSc.123554@fx38.iad>, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    At that point it's rubber house decryption.

    people in rubber houses shouldn't throw stones.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 15:45:17 2023
    On 2023-04-20, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 02:41, Chris wrote:

    It's a serious vulnerability. A thief shouldn't be able to
    permanently lock you out of your account with only the passcode.
    Given that everywhere else has MFA why doesn't this critical step
    have it?

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    Nonsense. My passcode is 19 characters, and I rarely need to type it in
    - maybe once a week, and definitely not multiple times a day.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 15:52:17 2023
    On 2023-04-20, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by
    having their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can
    irreversibly lose access to your AppleID with a thief only needing
    your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or
    provide them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why
    iPhones, iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e.
    fingerprint and face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    As you well know iOS (and macOS) forces you to use your
    passcode/password on a regular basis.

    That's definitely not the case here. I only have to enter my iPhone's
    passcode occasionally - once a week or so maximum. And my Watch unlocks
    my Mac automatically without me doing anything more than pressing a key
    on the keyboard of tapping the trackpad.

    Plus, there's the multitude of times that Face ID
    doesn't work and you need to resort to passcode.

    That's also a very occasional occurrence - maybe once or twice a month.

    What do you suggest people do?

    This would be a good start:

    * Use a more secure passcode that is longer than a 4-digit numeric pin
    code.

    * Don't enter your passcode in public places where people can watch over
    your shoulder.

    * Refrain from leaving your phone sitting out in the open at the bar
    while you get drunk.

    Do none of you live in the real world?

    Yes, but we have this thing called street smarts. It's a jungle out
    there. ; )

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 09:02:01 2023
    On 2023-04-20 00:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having >>> their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access >>> to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide >>> them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones,
    iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    As you well know iOS (and macOS) forces you to use your passcode/password
    on a regular basis. Plus, there's the multitude of times that Face ID
    doesn't work and you need to resort to passcode.

    No. iOS and macOS do NOT force you to use a passcode/password on a
    regular basis.


    What do you suggest people do? Not pay for the tank fuel they've just put
    in the car or the meal they've just eaten?

    I've used my phone to use Apple wallet for a very long time now.

    I have NEVER needed to use my passcode to do so.


    Do none of you live in the real world?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to nospam on Thu Apr 20 17:04:54 2023
    On 20/04/2023 14:48, nospam wrote:
    In article <u1re7l$k0ru$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during the
    day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked with face
    id or touch id.

    In normal usage, supposedly, however, in practice faceid doesn't always
    work.

    second, a passcode is required approximately *once* *a* *week*,
    depending on various factors. this is by design so that using a long
    passcode is a realistic option.

    That's technically the minimal usecase. In practice it's more often.

    third, a long *numeric* passcode is more than sufficient to prevent
    casual shoulder-surfing and is very easy to tap in since a numeric
    keypad will appear versus a keyboard. 10 digits should suffice, but
    longer is obviously more secure. a phone number that is not associated
    with the user works well, such as one from childhood.

    Many people struggle with normal PINs. A 10-digit passcode is a
    non-starter for them.

    another advantage is that there is no indication as to how many digits
    it actually is, so anyone who does manage to watch it being tapped in
    won't know if they missed a digit or have one too many.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 17:09:37 2023
    On 20/04/2023 14:48, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 09:20, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 02:41, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 19:25, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by >>>>>>> having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose >>>>>>> access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or >>>>>>> provide
    them your passcode.


    Does apple have a fix planned to patch this?

    Fix what?

    Patch what?

    It's a serious vulnerability. A thief shouldn't be able to
    permanently lock
    you out of your account with only the passcode. Given that
    everywhere else
    has MFA why doesn't this critical step have it?

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    Mine is 10 mixed chars.  OTOH, I use FaceID to open the phone.

    1Password password is longer - so they can't get at my bank account app
    if they manage to hold me down and get my FaceID.

    Same here for my pw manager.

    At that point it's rubber house decryption.

    that he picked up looking
    over your shoulder before taking the phone you cavalierly left on the
    bar, he'd get the MFA on the very same phone ... pretty useless.

    There's other options. A company as clever as Apple should be able to
    sort
    it out.

    See my other reply.

    If I lose control of the the keys to my car I can't really complain
    much
    if someone steals it and sends it off to Africa.

    Nice story.

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves -
    although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too.

    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having
    access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set
    of car
    keys.

    Irrelevant to you because it pisses all over your case.

    Lol. Sure. An analogy always pisses over reality... <sigh>

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos?
    Not so much.

    <insert more victim blaming here>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 17:16:21 2023
    On 20/04/2023 14:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 03:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by
    having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose
    access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or
    provide
    them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones,
    iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    There are unforced errors and forced errors.

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have
    prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY

    Ableist BS.

    2) Hide the code while entering it in public:  EASY-PEASY

    Ableist BS.

    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool:   DUH!

    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone
    is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 13:02:32 2023
    In article <u1rnr8$lkah$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:


    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during the
    day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked with face
    id or touch id.

    In normal usage, supposedly, however, in practice faceid doesn't always
    work.

    nothing is perfect. the reality is that it works nearly every time.

    for someone to be able to gain access to a phone, biometrics would need
    to fail at the exact moment someone is nearby who is a position to
    observe the passcode, *and* has interest in watching you tap in the
    code, *and* is successful in seeing every tap and memorizing the
    number, *and* successfully steals your phone.

    that's a *lot* of ifs.

    second, a passcode is required approximately *once* *a* *week*,
    depending on various factors. this is by design so that using a long passcode is a realistic option.

    That's technically the minimal usecase. In practice it's more often.

    the official timing is 6.5 days *and* without a passcode being entered
    in the previous 4 hours.

    in practice, it's about once a week, typically in the morning, with the
    4 hour gap being asleep overnight. no passcode is needed for the rest
    of the day and roughly a week following.

    that means the only person who can see you tapping in a passcode would
    be someone in the same bed, and if that person is planning on stealing
    your phone, then you have far bigger issues to worry about.

    third, a long *numeric* passcode is more than sufficient to prevent
    casual shoulder-surfing and is very easy to tap in since a numeric
    keypad will appear versus a keyboard. 10 digits should suffice, but
    longer is obviously more secure. a phone number that is not associated
    with the user works well, such as one from childhood.

    Many people struggle with normal PINs. A 10-digit passcode is a
    non-starter for them.

    then using a phone to make calls is going to be very difficult. how
    will they be able to call someone not in their contact list? what did
    they do with traditional land line phones?

    remembering one's childhood phone number is *easy*, especially given
    that parents make their kids memorize it just in case they need to call
    for a ride or get help or whatever.

    of course, it's possible that the rando watching you knows you from
    childhood and wants revenge from that incident in the schoolyard, and
    happens to remember your phone number back then, and knows you are
    currently using it as a passcode, successfully steals your phone and
    despite being an adult, still holds a grudge.

    otherwise, you're safe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 13:29:08 2023
    On 2023-04-20 12:09, Chris wrote:

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos?
    Not so much.

    ROFL. WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND KEEPS ALL THEIR PRECIOUS PHOTOS SOLELY ON
    iCLOUD or ANY OTHER CLOUD?

    HOW FUCKING DUMB ARE PEOPLE ANYWAY?

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 13:31:11 2023
    On 2023-04-20 12:16, Chris wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 14:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 03:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by
    having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly
    lose access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or
    provide
    them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones, >>>> iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    There are unforced errors and forced errors.

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have
    prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY

    Ableist BS.

    2) Hide the code while entering it in public:  EASY-PEASY

    Ableist BS.

    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool:   DUH!

    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone
    is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    You've trapped yourself with this "victim blaming" trope.

    Fact is: people who do not take precautions get burned.

    See my other recent reply re: "A lifetime of photos"

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 10:48:32 2023
    On 2023-04-20 09:09, Chris wrote:

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves -
    although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too.

    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having
    access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set
    of car
    keys.

    Irrelevant to you because it pisses all over your case.

    Lol. Sure. An analogy always pisses over reality... <sigh>

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos?
    Not so much.

    How can you even be in this conversation if you're not aware of the need
    for backups of digital devices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 18:36:03 2023
    On 2023-04-20, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 14:48, nospam wrote:
    In article <u1re7l$k0ru$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during
    the day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked with
    face id or touch id.

    In normal usage, supposedly, however, in practice faceid doesn't
    always work.

    You are completely full of shit if you think Face ID fails 25 time a day
    or even close to that. Your trolls are lame, as always.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 18:37:47 2023
    On 2023-04-20, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 12:09, Chris wrote:

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of
    photos? Not so much.

    ROFL. WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND KEEPS ALL THEIR PRECIOUS PHOTOS SOLELY
    ON iCLOUD or ANY OTHER CLOUD?

    HOW FUCKING DUMB ARE PEOPLE ANYWAY?

    This is just another manufactured fantasy scenario by a troll gang who questions whether the rest of us live in the real world.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 18:40:27 2023
    On 2023-04-20, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 14:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 03:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money
    by having their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can
    irreversibly lose access to your AppleID with a thief only needing
    your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see
    or provide them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why
    iPhones, iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e.
    fingerprint and face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    There are unforced errors and forced errors.

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have
    prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY

    Ableist BS.

    More complex doesn't have to be complete gibberish, silly boy. If you
    are unable to remember a simple phrase or sentence with numbers,
    capitals, and punctuation, having your iPhone stolen is the *least* of
    your problems.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Apr 20 18:34:48 2023
    On 2023-04-20, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 00:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by
    having their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can
    irreversibly lose access to your AppleID with a thief only needing
    your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or
    provide them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why
    iPhones, iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e.
    fingerprint and face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    As you well know iOS (and macOS) forces you to use your
    passcode/password on a regular basis. Plus, there's the multitude of
    times that Face ID doesn't work and you need to resort to passcode.

    No. iOS and macOS do NOT force you to use a passcode/password on a
    regular basis.


    What do you suggest people do? Not pay for the tank fuel they've just
    put in the car or the meal they've just eaten?

    I've used my phone to use Apple wallet for a very long time now.

    I have NEVER needed to use my passcode to do so.

    It is crystal clear that these trolls haven't used the things they are
    trolling about - all while ironically asking the rest of us if we live
    in the real world. 🤡

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to Wilf on Thu Apr 20 11:44:24 2023
    On 4/20/2023 12:34 AM, Wilf wrote:

    <snip>

    ... although of course the other factors in MFA would likely involve the
    same phone receiving a texted code or email with a code in it.   That wouldn't actually help in such a case.

    That is why there's a need to be able to individually lock apps, with a different passcode or with biometrics.

    "A Basic iPhone Feature Helps Criminals Steal Your Entire Digital Life" <https://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-iphone-security-theft-passcode-data-privacya-basic-iphone-feature-helps-criminals-steal-your-digital-life-cbf14b1a>

    "Apple kept asking 'have you tried Find My iPhone?' after a woman got
    locked out of her Apple account and had thousands taken from her bank
    account when a thief grabbed her iPhone" <https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-not-helpful-woman-locked-out-apple-account-lost-10k-2023-2>

    Hopefully iOS 17 will add the capability to lock individual apps. Some
    Android manufacturers already have this capability, in some cases not
    even allowing the phone to be powered off without a passcode or
    biometrics. There are app locking apps for Android devices that don't
    have app locking built into the Android distribution. Hopefully Android
    will add this as a standard feature in a future release and not leave it
    to individual device manufacturers.

    See 187a on page 96 of the document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JznrWfGJDA8CYVfjSnPTwfVy8-gAC0kPyaApuJTcUNE/edit#bookmark=id.8m5lho8ne3if>.

    --
    “If you are not an expert on a subject, then your opinions about it
    really do matter less than the opinions of experts. It's not
    indoctrination nor elitism. It's just that you don't know as much as
    they do about the subject.”—Tin Foil Awards

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to jollyroger@pobox.com on Thu Apr 20 14:46:26 2023
    In article <kadf0jFpid9U2@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during
    the day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked with
    face id or touch id.

    In normal usage, supposedly, however, in practice faceid doesn't
    always work.

    You are completely full of shit if you think Face ID fails 25 time a day
    or even close to that. Your trolls are lame, as always.

    maybe it's dark where he is. turning on a room light would fix that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to scharf.steven@geemail.com on Thu Apr 20 14:48:27 2023
    In article <u1s16a$n1e0$1@dont-email.me>, sms
    <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:

    That is why there's a need to be able to individually lock apps, with a different passcode or with biometrics.

    many apps, particularly financial apps, do exactly that.

    just beware of a bad guy playing a game and ruining a winning streak.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 15:32:39 2023
    On 2023-04-20 12:04, Chris wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 14:48, nospam wrote:
    In article <u1re7l$k0ru$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during the
    day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked with face
    id or touch id.

    In normal usage, supposedly, however, in practice faceid doesn't always
    work.

    Almost always - and re-orienting sorts it out. The place it works the
    least is when it's in my car in its mount. I have to lean in a little
    which may not be safe depending on road/traffic conditions. Roll down
    the road to a safer location for me to lean it and ... done in a jiff.
    And in my car, if I can't unlock the phone, it can wait until it's safe
    to do so.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to nospam on Thu Apr 20 15:33:35 2023
    On 2023-04-20 14:46, nospam wrote:
    In article <kadf0jFpid9U2@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during
    the day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked with
    face id or touch id.

    In normal usage, supposedly, however, in practice faceid doesn't
    always work.

    You are completely full of shit if you think Face ID fails 25 time a day
    or even close to that. Your trolls are lame, as always.

    maybe it's dark where he is. turning on a room light would fix that.

    < he laid the trap quietly, waiting for the prey to foollishly walk in ...>

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 22:20:59 2023
    Am 20.04.23 um 15:43 schrieb Alan Browne:
    On 2023-04-20 03:52, Chris wrote:
    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    There are unforced errors and forced errors.

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY
    2) Hide the code while entering it in public: EASY-PEASY
    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool: DUH!

    There is even more: Use biometrics or apply your proposed measures.
    I simply have difficulties to reconcile the issue.

    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 22:22:47 2023
    Am 20.04.23 um 18:16 schrieb Chris:
    On 20/04/2023 14:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have
    prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY

    Ableist BS.

    2) Hide the code while entering it in public:  EASY-PEASY

    Ableist BS.

    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool:   DUH!

    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone
    is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    Stealing an iPhone does not give access to the iCloud-account.

    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Joerg Lorenz on Thu Apr 20 16:29:38 2023
    On 2023-04-20 16:20, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 15:43 schrieb Alan Browne:
    On 2023-04-20 03:52, Chris wrote:
    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    There are unforced errors and forced errors.

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have prevented: >>
    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY
    2) Hide the code while entering it in public: EASY-PEASY
    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool: DUH!

    There is even more: Use biometrics or apply your proposed measures.
    I simply have difficulties to reconcile the issue.

    He has latched on to something and logic won't pierce the obstinance.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Apr 20 20:36:54 2023
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 00:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having >>>> their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide
    them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones,
    iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    As you well know iOS (and macOS) forces you to use your passcode/password
    on a regular basis. Plus, there's the multitude of times that Face ID
    doesn't work and you need to resort to passcode.

    No. iOS and macOS do NOT force you to use a passcode/password on a
    regular basis.

    Funny that they both do for me. My Mac which I use daily for work about
    once or twice a week will require a password to enable Touch ID.

    I never turn it off and it rarely reboot it.


    What do you suggest people do? Not pay for the tank fuel they've just put
    in the car or the meal they've just eaten?

    I've used my phone to use Apple wallet for a very long time now.

    I have NEVER needed to use my passcode to do so.

    Literally never? I find that hard to believe. Did you never use a mask
    during covid?


    Do none of you live in the real world?



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Joerg Lorenz on Thu Apr 20 20:36:55 2023
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 18:16 schrieb Chris:
    On 20/04/2023 14:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have
    prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY

    Ableist BS.

    2) Hide the code while entering it in public:  EASY-PEASY

    Ableist BS.

    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool:   DUH!

    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone
    is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    Stealing an iPhone does not give access to the iCloud-account.

    Did someone say it did?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 20:36:55 2023
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 12:16, Chris wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 14:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 03:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by >>>>>> having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly
    lose access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or >>>>>> provide
    them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones, >>>>> iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and >>>>> face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    There are unforced errors and forced errors.

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have
    prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY

    Ableist BS.

    2) Hide the code while entering it in public:  EASY-PEASY

    Ableist BS.

    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool:   DUH!

    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone
    is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    You've trapped yourself with this "victim blaming" trope.

    It's not a trope. You're assuming your experience is the same as everyone else's. The reality is there are many people - due to a variety of reasons
    - who do not find your suggestions easy nor elementary.

    Fact is: people who do not take precautions get burned.

    Yet you don't accept that Apple could do a simple fix.

    See my other recent reply re: "A lifetime of photos"


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to sms on Thu Apr 20 20:47:17 2023
    sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
    On 4/20/2023 12:34 AM, Wilf wrote:

    <snip>

    ... although of course the other factors in MFA would likely involve the
    same phone receiving a texted code or email with a code in it.   That
    wouldn't actually help in such a case.

    That is why there's a need to be able to individually lock apps, with a different passcode or with biometrics.

    This already happens and the issue is with iOS and your AppleID.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Apr 20 20:52:17 2023
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 09:09, Chris wrote:

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves - >>>>> although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too.

    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having
    access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set
    of car
    keys.

    Irrelevant to you because it pisses all over your case.

    Lol. Sure. An analogy always pisses over reality... <sigh>

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos?
    Not so much.

    How can you even be in this conversation if you're not aware of the need
    for backups of digital devices.

    I absolutely do. Hence why I don't use icloud.

    Strangely enough this isn't about me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Apr 20 21:04:21 2023
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 16:20, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 15:43 schrieb Alan Browne:
    On 2023-04-20 03:52, Chris wrote:
    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    There are unforced errors and forced errors.

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY
    2) Hide the code while entering it in public: EASY-PEASY
    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool: DUH!

    There is even more: Use biometrics or apply your proposed measures.
    I simply have difficulties to reconcile the issue.

    He has latched on to something and logic won't pierce the obstinance.

    And you're all too focused on attacking the messenger or blame the user
    than engage with the issue.

    Does it not bother you that a thief only needs your passcode to fully
    disable your access to your Apple account incl. icloud?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Apr 20 20:57:17 2023
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 14:48, nospam wrote:
    In article <u1re7l$k0ru$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during
    the day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked with
    face id or touch id.

    In normal usage, supposedly, however, in practice faceid doesn't
    always work.

    You are completely full of shit if you think Face ID fails 25 time a day
    or even close to that. Your trolls are lame, as always.

    You might want to learn to read.

    Engage brain before typing your dull ad hominems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 17:13:22 2023
    On 2023-04-20 17:04, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 16:20, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 15:43 schrieb Alan Browne:
    On 2023-04-20 03:52, Chris wrote:
    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    There are unforced errors and forced errors.

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY
    2) Hide the code while entering it in public: EASY-PEASY
    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool: DUH!

    There is even more: Use biometrics or apply your proposed measures.
    I simply have difficulties to reconcile the issue.

    He has latched on to something and logic won't pierce the obstinance.

    And you're all too focused on attacking the messenger or blame the user
    than engage with the issue.

    Does it not bother you that a thief only needs your passcode to fully
    disable your access to your Apple account incl. icloud?

    Recall [1]: Passcodes don't need to be silly 4 digit numbers. Or even 6. Recall [2]: Allowing people to glance over your shoulder while you enter
    your 4 or 6 digit passcode is not smart.

    Recall [3]: Protecting your iPhone from theft is a good idea.

    and what the heck: Important data should be backed up where access to
    your Apple account is not at all required.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 17:11:03 2023
    On 2023-04-20 16:36, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 12:16, Chris wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 14:43, Alan Browne wrote:

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have
    prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY [ 1 ]

    Ableist BS.

    2) Hide the code while entering it in public:  EASY-PEASY [ 2 ]

    Ableist BS.

    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool:   DUH! [ 3 ] >>>>
    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone
    is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    You've trapped yourself with this "victim blaming" trope.

    It's not a trope. You're assuming your experience is the same as everyone else's. The reality is there are many people - due to a variety of reasons
    - who do not find your suggestions easy nor elementary.

    Any doofus (well most) recognizes that a 4 digit passcode is crap. [1]

    How many times are people told to cover the keypad when accessing a bank account with their PIN? [2]

    Protecting your phone from theft is pretty obvious to most [3]

    So - with simple defense in depth: even if [3] unfortunately happened,
    [2] and esp. [1] should not have been vulnerable points.


    Fact is: people who do not take precautions get burned.

    Yet you don't accept that Apple could do a simple fix.

    Actually, elsewhere I pointed out that it would be a welcome thing if
    Apple added government issue ID as a document one could upload to ones
    account as a future proofing method.

    See my other recent reply re: "A lifetime of photos"
    <crickets> Did you headslap on the the "Gee, backing up a lifetime of
    precious photos" might be a good idead?

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 17:39:08 2023
    In article <u1s9cl$odnq$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Does it not bother you that a thief only needs your passcode to fully
    disable your access to your Apple account incl. icloud?

    someone can also do that if they know your icloud password.

    someone can also disable your account with by multiple failed attempts,
    causing the account to be locked down, and resetting it is not always
    easy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 23:43:39 2023
    Am 20.04.23 um 22:36 schrieb Chris:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 18:16 schrieb Chris:
    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone
    is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    Stealing an iPhone does not give access to the iCloud-account.

    Did someone say it did?

    Yes in the above quote by implication in the context of this thread.
    Then explain where the problem lies except the stupidity of handful of
    users who are obviously not qualified to use high-tech devices.

    --
    Gutta cavat lapidem (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 23:47:59 2023
    Am 20.04.23 um 23:04 schrieb Chris:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    He has latched on to something and logic won't pierce the obstinance.

    And you're all too focused on attacking the messenger or blame the user
    than engage with the issue.

    Does it not bother you that a thief only needs your passcode to fully
    disable your access to your Apple account incl. icloud?

    No. The precautions are very robust. There is no protection against
    stupidity and negligence. We know that from real life.

    --
    Gutta cavat lapidem (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to nospam on Fri Apr 21 00:31:06 2023
    On 2023-04-20, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    In article <kadf0jFpid9U2@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger
    <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during
    the day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked
    with face id or touch id.

    In normal usage, supposedly, however, in practice faceid doesn't
    always work.

    You are completely full of shit if you think Face ID fails 25 time a
    day or even close to that. Your trolls are lame, as always.

    maybe it's dark where he is. turning on a room light would fix that.

    It is dark under those bridges.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Apr 21 00:31:48 2023
    On 2023-04-20, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 14:48, nospam wrote:
    In article <u1re7l$k0ru$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    If someone uses your crappy 4 or 6 digit code

    No-one's going to have a 25 character alphanumeric passcode on the
    lockscreen to type several times a day.

    first of all, there is no need to enter the passcode at all during
    the day, let alone several times, because the phone is unlocked
    with face id or touch id.

    In normal usage, supposedly, however, in practice faceid doesn't
    always work.

    You are completely full of shit if you think Face ID fails 25 time a
    day or even close to that. Your trolls are lame, as always.

    You might want to learn to read.

    Engage brain before typing your dull ad hominems.

    Even several times a day is bullshit.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to scharf.steven@geemail.com on Thu Apr 20 21:49:33 2023
    In article <u1sof9$qjfm$1@dont-email.me>, sms
    <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:

    I should have pointed out that there are Jailbreak tweaks to add
    biometric protection to iPhone apps. That information is in the document
    in the section bookmarked above.

    you also should have pointed out that jailbreaking results in many apps
    no longer working, notably financial apps, due to the device no longer
    being secure.

    It's unclear if some, or any, of the useful Jailbreak tweaks will be available as side-loaded apps to a non-Jailbroken phone when iOS begins
    to allow sideloading.

    it's clear to anyone who has even a little bit of familiarity with ios.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to sms on Thu Apr 20 18:21:45 2023
    On 4/20/2023 11:44 AM, sms wrote:

    <snip>

    See 187a on page 96 of the document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JznrWfGJDA8CYVfjSnPTwfVy8-gAC0kPyaApuJTcUNE/edit#bookmark=id.8m5lho8ne3if>.

    I should have pointed out that there are Jailbreak tweaks to add
    biometric protection to iPhone apps. That information is in the document
    in the section bookmarked above.

    It's unclear if some, or any, of the useful Jailbreak tweaks will be
    available as side-loaded apps to a non-Jailbroken phone when iOS begins
    to allow sideloading.

    --
    “If you are not an expert on a subject, then your opinions about it
    really do matter less than the opinions of experts. It's not
    indoctrination nor elitism. It's just that you don't know as much as
    they do about the subject.”—Tin Foil Awards

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 20:17:08 2023
    On 2023-04-20 13:36, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 00:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide
    them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones, >>>> iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and
    face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    As you well know iOS (and macOS) forces you to use your passcode/password >>> on a regular basis. Plus, there's the multitude of times that Face ID
    doesn't work and you need to resort to passcode.

    No. iOS and macOS do NOT force you to use a passcode/password on a
    regular basis.

    Funny that they both do for me. My Mac which I use daily for work about
    once or twice a week will require a password to enable Touch ID.

    I never turn it off and it rarely reboot it.


    What do you suggest people do? Not pay for the tank fuel they've just put >>> in the car or the meal they've just eaten?

    I've used my phone to use Apple wallet for a very long time now.

    I have NEVER needed to use my passcode to do so.

    Literally never? I find that hard to believe. Did you never use a mask
    during covid?

    TouchID.

    And yes: literally never.

    I have never once used my passcode to use Apple wallet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Apr 20 20:18:52 2023
    On 2023-04-20 13:52, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 09:09, Chris wrote:

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves - >>>>>> although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too.

    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having >>>>> access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set >>>>> of car
    keys.

    Irrelevant to you because it pisses all over your case.

    Lol. Sure. An analogy always pisses over reality... <sigh>

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos? >>> Not so much.

    How can you even be in this conversation if you're not aware of the need
    for backups of digital devices.

    I absolutely do. Hence why I don't use icloud.

    And you're completely unaware that one can do hardwired backups of an
    iOS device.


    Strangely enough this isn't about me.

    Plainly enough...

    ...you're demonstrating over and over you don't have a clue about how
    iOS devices function.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bernd Froehlich@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Apr 21 06:14:28 2023
    On 20. Apr 2023 at 18:02:01 CEST, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    No. iOS and macOS do NOT force you to use a passcode/password on a
    regular basis.

    Ummm than you must have another iOS than me.
    I´m regularly (about every two weeks) getting asked on the iPhone and the
    iPad to enter my passcode.
    And I think that is a good thing, otherwise regular users would forget
    their passcode and be locked out If they restart the device when they definitely need the passcode.

    Is this really not so in your case?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Joerg Lorenz on Fri Apr 21 06:38:28 2023
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 23:04 schrieb Chris:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    He has latched on to something and logic won't pierce the obstinance.

    And you're all too focused on attacking the messenger or blame the user
    than engage with the issue.

    Does it not bother you that a thief only needs your passcode to fully
    disable your access to your Apple account incl. icloud?

    No. The precautions are very robust.

    Clearly not.

    There is no protection against
    stupidity and negligence. We know that from real life.

    That's clearly not true, especially in the US. There are many situations
    where people's stupidity is protected (in law) like for example from
    spilling hot coffee on themselves.

    Would you also argue that airbags or seatbelts are unnecessary because
    people shouldn't be stupid enough to get into accidents?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Apr 21 06:38:30 2023
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 13:36, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 00:52, Chris wrote:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 00:23 schrieb Chris:

    Following on from previous discussions about people losing money by having
    their phone stolen, it now also looks like you can irreversibly lose access
    to your AppleID with a thief only needing your passcode.
    https://www.karltarvas.com/protecting-your-iphone-against-shoulder-surfing-password-theft.html

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide
    them your passcode.

    Only idiots use passcodes in crowded public places. Guess why iPhones, >>>>> iPads and Macs offer access via biometric means i.e. fingerprint and >>>>> face recognition?

    The amount of victim blaming going on here is depressing.

    As you well know iOS (and macOS) forces you to use your passcode/password >>>> on a regular basis. Plus, there's the multitude of times that Face ID
    doesn't work and you need to resort to passcode.

    No. iOS and macOS do NOT force you to use a passcode/password on a
    regular basis.

    Funny that they both do for me. My Mac which I use daily for work about
    once or twice a week will require a password to enable Touch ID.

    I never turn it off and it rarely reboot it.


    What do you suggest people do? Not pay for the tank fuel they've just put >>>> in the car or the meal they've just eaten?

    I've used my phone to use Apple wallet for a very long time now.

    I have NEVER needed to use my passcode to do so.

    Literally never? I find that hard to believe. Did you never use a mask
    during covid?

    TouchID.

    And yes: literally never.

    I have never once used my passcode to use Apple wallet.

    Am happy for you, then. Not the reality for others, including myself. This
    also reaffirms my personal preference for TouchID.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bernd Froehlich on Thu Apr 20 23:41:03 2023
    On 2023-04-20 23:14, Bernd Froehlich wrote:
    On 20. Apr 2023 at 18:02:01 CEST, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    No. iOS and macOS do NOT force you to use a passcode/password on a
    regular basis.

    Ummm than you must have another iOS than me.
    I´m regularly (about every two weeks) getting asked on the iPhone and the iPad to enter my passcode.

    Oh, no!

    Every...

    ...TWO WEEKS!

    The horror!

    And I think that is a good thing, otherwise regular users would forget
    their passcode and be locked out If they restart the device when they definitely need the passcode.

    Is this really not so in your case.

    It's really not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Apr 21 06:43:29 2023
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 13:52, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 09:09, Chris wrote:

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves - >>>>>>> although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too.

    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having >>>>>> access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set >>>>>> of car
    keys.

    Irrelevant to you because it pisses all over your case.

    Lol. Sure. An analogy always pisses over reality... <sigh>

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos? >>>> Not so much.

    How can you even be in this conversation if you're not aware of the need >>> for backups of digital devices.

    I absolutely do. Hence why I don't use icloud.

    And you're completely unaware that one can do hardwired backups of an
    iOS device.

    Am I? My multiple local copies of photos disagree with you.


    Strangely enough this isn't about me.

    Plainly enough...

    ...you're demonstrating over and over you don't have a clue about how
    iOS devices function.

    Lol. You're looking for reasons to attack the messenger.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Apr 21 00:02:24 2023
    On 2023-04-20 23:43, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 13:52, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 09:09, Chris wrote:

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves - >>>>>>>> although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too.

    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having >>>>>>> access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set >>>>>>> of car
    keys.

    Irrelevant to you because it pisses all over your case.

    Lol. Sure. An analogy always pisses over reality... <sigh>

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos? >>>>> Not so much.

    How can you even be in this conversation if you're not aware of the need >>>> for backups of digital devices.

    I absolutely do. Hence why I don't use icloud.

    And you're completely unaware that one can do hardwired backups of an
    iOS device.

    Am I? My multiple local copies of photos disagree with you.

    And yet you said:

    'A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos?'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Joerg Lorenz on Fri Apr 21 06:47:42 2023
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 22:36 schrieb Chris:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 18:16 schrieb Chris:
    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone >>>> is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    Stealing an iPhone does not give access to the iCloud-account.

    Did someone say it did?

    Yes in the above quote by implication in the context of this thread.

    You need to improve your comprehension skills or maybe you're not qualified
    for usenet.

    Then explain where the problem lies

    Read the OP and the associated WSJ article.

    except the stupidity of handful of
    users who are obviously not qualified to use high-tech devices.

    People are still too stupid to drive and carry guns even with licences.
    Your ridiculous comment wouldn't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 21 11:30:56 2023
    Am 21.04.23 um 08:38 schrieb Chris:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 23:04 schrieb Chris:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    He has latched on to something and logic won't pierce the obstinance.

    And you're all too focused on attacking the messenger or blame the user
    than engage with the issue.

    Does it not bother you that a thief only needs your passcode to fully
    disable your access to your Apple account incl. icloud?

    No. The precautions are very robust.

    Clearly not.

    There is no protection against
    stupidity and negligence. We know that from real life.

    That's clearly not true, especially in the US. There are many situations where people's stupidity is protected (in law) like for example from
    spilling hot coffee on themselves.

    95% of the global population do not live in the USA.

    Would you also argue that airbags or seatbelts are unnecessary because
    people shouldn't be stupid enough to get into accidents?

    Don't you have the capacity to recognise the difference? Very sad.

    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 21 11:29:13 2023
    Am 21.04.23 um 08:47 schrieb Chris:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 22:36 schrieb Chris:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 18:16 schrieb Chris:
    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone >>>>> is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    Stealing an iPhone does not give access to the iCloud-account.

    Did someone say it did?

    Yes in the above quote by implication in the context of this thread.

    You need to improve your comprehension skills or maybe you're not qualified for usenet.

    You make a total fool of yourself. Don't you have the capacity to
    recognise that? You try to make a story of nothing. I'm inclined to
    believe it happened to you and now you try to blame others.

    Then explain where the problem lies

    Read the OP and the associated WSJ article.

    except the stupidity of handful of
    users who are obviously not qualified to use high-tech devices.

    People are still too stupid to drive and carry guns even with licences.
    Your ridiculous comment wouldn't work.

    You are a Troll.


    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Apr 21 11:59:37 2023
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 23:43, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 13:52, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 09:09, Chris wrote:

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves - >>>>>>>>> although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too. >>>>>>>>
    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having >>>>>>>> access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set >>>>>>>> of car
    keys.

    Irrelevant to you because it pisses all over your case.

    Lol. Sure. An analogy always pisses over reality... <sigh>

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos? >>>>>> Not so much.

    How can you even be in this conversation if you're not aware of the need >>>>> for backups of digital devices.

    I absolutely do. Hence why I don't use icloud.

    And you're completely unaware that one can do hardwired backups of an
    iOS device.

    Am I? My multiple local copies of photos disagree with you.

    And yet you said:

    'A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos?'

    I also said this isn't about me. I also don't own a car so car theft isn't
    an issue for me either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Apr 21 08:30:31 2023
    On 2023-04-21 08:15, Chris wrote:

    It's also not just photos. Your car analogy was simply dumb.

    It's inconvenient to your claims. Not dumb.

    You've only proven you don't think things through. You don't understand defense in depth. For cars or phones.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Fri Apr 21 12:15:41 2023
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 16:36, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 12:16, Chris wrote:
    On 20/04/2023 14:43, Alan Browne wrote:

    These are unforced errors that the phone owners could easily have
    prevented:

    1) Longer, more complex pass code: ELEMENTARY [ 1 ]

    Ableist BS.

    2) Hide the code while entering it in public:  EASY-PEASY [ 2 ]

    Ableist BS.

    3) Don't leave your phone on the bar 'cause it's cool:   DUH! [ 3 ] >>>>>
    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone >>>> is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    You've trapped yourself with this "victim blaming" trope.

    It's not a trope. You're assuming your experience is the same as everyone
    else's. The reality is there are many people - due to a variety of reasons >> - who do not find your suggestions easy nor elementary.

    Any doofus (well most) recognizes that a 4 digit passcode is crap. [1]

    There you go again with your superiority complex. Also no-one's has a
    4-digit code in many years.

    How many times are people told to cover the keypad when accessing a bank account with their PIN? [2]

    Impossible to do when holding your phone.

    Protecting your phone from theft is pretty obvious to most [3]

    No-one is saying otherwise, however, thefts can and so happen. All the
    time. Hence why Apple have put in a multitude of mechanisms in place to
    reduce theft or make things harder for the thief.

    I'm only highlighting that there's another thing that Apple need to do.

    It will literally not impact you in any way as you're already too smart.

    So - with simple defense in depth: even if [3] unfortunately happened,
    [2] and esp. [1] should not have been vulnerable points.


    Fact is: people who do not take precautions get burned.

    Yet you don't accept that Apple could do a simple fix.

    Actually, elsewhere I pointed out that it would be a welcome thing if
    Apple added government issue ID as a document one could upload to ones account as a future proofing method.

    And I replied, with you ignored.

    It's also a post hoc solution. Better not to enable a thief to lock you out
    so easily.

    See my other recent reply re: "A lifetime of photos"
    <crickets> Did you headslap on the the "Gee, backing up a lifetime of precious photos" might be a good idead?

    It is a good idea which is why I do it. Most iphone users don't, however.
    They think icloud is a backup. Until Apple makes it at easy to locally
    backup your photos as it is to set up icloud, then people won't.

    It's also not just photos. Your car analogy was simply dumb.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Bob Campbell on Fri Apr 21 09:39:29 2023
    On 2023-04-21 09:28, Bob Campbell wrote:
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide >> them your passcode.

    Well Duh.

    This is one of the most ridiculous threads ever started here. And as you can imagine, that’s up against some pretty stiff competition.

    What’s next? Do not provide anyone your house keys? Do not provide anyone your wallet? Do not provide anyone your SSN?

    There is currently no workaround for any of these. Stupidity cannot be “worked around”, nor can it be fixed with a software patch.

    A wetware patch does help.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Campbell@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Apr 21 13:28:34 2023
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide them your passcode.

    Well Duh.

    This is one of the most ridiculous threads ever started here. And as you
    can imagine, that’s up against some pretty stiff competition.

    What’s next? Do not provide anyone your house keys? Do not provide
    anyone your wallet? Do not provide anyone your SSN?

    There is currently no workaround for any of these. Stupidity cannot be “worked around”, nor can it be fixed with a software patch.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From quicksilver@21:1/5 to sms on Fri Apr 21 09:59:44 2023
    On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:44:24 -0700, sms wrote:

    Hopefully iOS 17 will add the capability to lock individual apps.

    I thought you can do that since iOS 12 using Apple's App Limits feature. https://www.macrumors.com/how-to/passcode-lock-app/

    It seems like an ugly mess but as bad as it is, it works for a short time. https://www.rd.com/article/how-to-lock-apps-iphone/

    Even that ugly mess is probably better than using Guided Access to do it. https://www.makeuseof.com/how-to-lock-apps-on-iphone/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Apr 21 06:48:35 2023
    On 2023-04-21 04:59, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 23:43, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 13:52, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 09:09, Chris wrote:

    Actually happens on the east coast of North America daily in droves -
    although mostly not even with the keys - but that happens too. >>>>>>>>>
    Not my point. It's an irrelevant analogy. Stealing a phone and having >>>>>>>>> access to itsits contents is nothing like the same as stealing a set >>>>>>>>> of car
    keys.

    Irrelevant to you because it pisses all over your case.

    Lol. Sure. An analogy always pisses over reality... <sigh>

    A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos?
    Not so much.

    How can you even be in this conversation if you're not aware of the need >>>>>> for backups of digital devices.

    I absolutely do. Hence why I don't use icloud.

    And you're completely unaware that one can do hardwired backups of an
    iOS device.

    Am I? My multiple local copies of photos disagree with you.

    And yet you said:

    'A stolen car is easily replaceable with insurance. I lifetime of photos?'

    I also said this isn't about me. I also don't own a car so car theft isn't
    an issue for me either.


    Sounds like a superiority complex...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 21 16:07:23 2023
    Am 21.04.23 um 15:28 schrieb Bob Campbell:
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

    There is currently no workaround for this. Do not let anyone see or provide >> them your passcode.

    Well Duh.

    This is one of the most ridiculous threads ever started here. And as you can imagine, that’s up against some pretty stiff competition.

    What’s next? Do not provide anyone your house keys? Do not provide anyone your wallet? Do not provide anyone your SSN?

    There is currently no workaround for any of these. Stupidity cannot be “worked around”, nor can it be fixed with a software patch.

    +1

    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Bernd Froehlich on Fri Apr 21 14:58:15 2023
    On 2023-04-21, Bernd Froehlich <befr@eaglesoft.de> wrote:
    On 20. Apr 2023 at 18:02:01 CEST, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    No. iOS and macOS do NOT force you to use a passcode/password on a
    regular basis.

    Ummm than you must have another iOS than me.
    I´m regularly (about every two weeks) getting asked on the iPhone and the iPad to enter my passcode.

    Every couple weeks isn't "regularly" when people unlock their iPhones
    multiple times a day every day of the week.

    And I think that is a good thing, otherwise regular users would forget
    their passcode and be locked out If they restart the device when they definitely need the passcode.

    It's also good for security reasons, since only the owner knows the
    passcode.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 21 11:41:07 2023
    In article <u1tupd$14433$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:


    Any doofus (well most) recognizes that a 4 digit passcode is crap. [1]

    There you go again with your superiority complex. Also no-one's has a
    4-digit code in many years.

    i know several people who currently use a 4 digit code, and that's with
    a recent iphone and ios 16.

    i've also seen people unlock their phones (both ios & android) where
    their fingers move 4 times (no idea what numbers they tapped, nor do i
    care).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Joerg Lorenz on Fri Apr 21 16:54:59 2023
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 21.04.23 um 08:47 schrieb Chris:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 22:36 schrieb Chris:
    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
    Am 20.04.23 um 18:16 schrieb Chris:
    No-one does it because it's cool, grandad. There are many ways a phone >>>>>> is stolen that don't require blaming the victim.

    Stealing an iPhone does not give access to the iCloud-account.

    Did someone say it did?

    Yes in the above quote by implication in the context of this thread.

    You need to improve your comprehension skills or maybe you're not qualified >> for usenet.

    You make a total fool of yourself.

    Projection. It's not my fault you can't understand.

    Explain where it was implied that stealing an iphone provides access to the icloud account.

    Don't you have the capacity to
    recognise that? You try to make a story of nothing. I'm inclined to
    believe it happened to you and now you try to blame others.

    Then explain where the problem lies

    Read the OP and the associated WSJ article.

    except the stupidity of handful of
    users who are obviously not qualified to use high-tech devices.

    People are still too stupid to drive and carry guns even with licences.
    Your ridiculous comment wouldn't work.

    You are a Troll.

    If you're not prepared to read the information provided, how am I the
    troll? What actually have you contributed to this thread?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LAGA JP@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 26 11:40:44 2023