*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote

Have you ever heard of "*Mount Stupid*" before I brought up Dunning-Kruger? >>

Wharton organizational psychologist Adam Grant famously popularized it in
his book *Think Again* so you are not so unique in "knowing" about this fictitious representation.

Hi Hemidactylus,

The problem with you iKooks is you get _everything wrong_ in every case.
a. Alan Baker swears he's taken Physics & yet never heard of a catenary
b. Chris swears he has a medical-based Phd & yet ridiculed immunology terms
c. Jolly Roger swears Apple fully patches older releases when Apple doesn't
d. nospam swears graphical signal strength apps exist - and yet they do not
e. You refute the D-K effect & yet you are ignorant of their seminal papers etc.

OBSERVATION:
*Strange low-IQ uneducated ignorant iKooks live squarely on Mount Stupid*

To wit...
I never said I was "unique in knowing about Mount Stupid", Hemidactylus.

In fact, everyone _except the iKooks_ seems to know this basic stuff.
Which is my point, after all...

<https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/17825/what-is-the-primary-source-of-the-mount-stupid-graphic>

Yet in that page you either didn't read or comprehend it is said of the graphs in the D-K effect paper: "These graphics bare little resemblance to the ones found online - having no "mount stupid" in evidence. The online images vary widely in their presentation, so if there is a primary source, then it would be good to know which one is the correct graphic, or if they are all fake."

Again, I know EXACTLY what the graphs look like in the seminal papers, Hemidactylus - and in fact you disputed that they tested English scores.

It's no longer shocking that you iKooks guess about everything.
It's why you know nothing.

It's why Alan Baker never heard of one of the most fundamental curves based
on the forces of nature (which, let's be clear, work with centrifugal
forces the same way they work with gravitational forces).

BTW, do you see what I just wrote above?
Look at it.

Can you tell I have a vast educational advantage over you, Hemidactylus?
Notice that most of the catenary cites will be about bridges.
But also notice the forces of nature apply to centrifugal forces also.

(Let's not get into the "fictitious forces" argument for the time being.)

Do you think Alan Baker caught that the forces work the same in the
horizontal (sidewise) direction as they do in the vertical direction?

*I am sure he doesn't have a clue.*
He is an iKook, after all.

In fact, this "expert teacher of racing" has no idea what a centrifugal
force is, and certainly any true racing instructor would know of it.

Add that to https://youtu.be/kcfRe15I47I?si=wOBDGBaO1SiUx5I6

I wonder if you realize the video proves you're an idiot, Hemidactylus?

Remember when you ridiculed that I said the original studies included
English grammar proficiency? Remember you claimed I didn't read the
studies?

Guess what?
Go to time point 174 seconds in that video please...
<https://youtu.be/kcfRe15I47I?t=174>

*What does it say they tested in the original studies*, Hemidactylus?

HINT: English grammar. I read them. I understood them. You did neither. DOUBLEHINT: That's _always_ the case with you strange ignorant iKooks.

Moving on to time point 183, do you see the "four group" markings?
<https://youtu.be/kcfRe15I47I?t=183>
Do you now realize why I spoke of the "quartile" lines, Hemidactylus?

You claimed I never read the seminal papers, and yet, why is it that I know EXACTLY what they tested, and exactly how they grouped the people's score?

None of which show up in the "Mount Stupid" graphs, Hemidactylus.
HINT: You iKooks are so incredibly ignorant you miss every single fact!

That video is titled *The Irony of the Dunning-Kruger Effect*, where it
aptly discusses the iKooks when it start with the quote contrasting the intelligent people (who are full of doubts) with the iKooks when saying:
*The stupid people are full of confidence*

Every iKook lives on "Mount Stupid", which was my reason for bringing
up not only the catenary, but almost everything I do on this newsgroup.

Yet again you wallow ironically within your own ignorance of the DK
'effect' which is likely a mere statistical artifact. Mount Stupid is even stupider than the DKE yet you use it as a cudgel to little or no polemic benefit. Everyone realizes you are a poseur.

First off, "stupider" isn't even a word; but more important, I'm well aware
of the graphs in the Dunning-Kruger studies - which - you may recall - is
why I said many times EVERYONE fits on the graphs - and which - you may
recall - I discussed the various quartiles - as the variance between test scores and self-bias assessments is what puts people into those areas.

You, of course, belong squarely far to the left of the first quartile line.
As do all iKooks.

I proved it about the iKooks. Using the catenary & Dunning Kruger, but
since they're all so shockingly uneducated, almost anything works
(e.g., Chris claimed to have a PhD in medical sciences and yet he ridiculed >> the simplest term often used in immunology - which proved he was lying).

I seriously doubt you have the knowledge of immunology you are feigning
here for dramatic effect.

Heh heh heh... the video you promoted pegs you perfectly at time point
<https://youtu.be/kcfRe15I47I?t=357>
"Overconfidence among beginners"

To wit:
Q: How much do _you_ know about immunology?

HINT: I wrote a book (unpublished as yet) about Type IV cellular immunity
as it pertains to allergies (specifically poison oak allergies).

DOUBLEHINT: I'm on record on this ng for being a contributing author to a peer-reviewed published paper on how microorganisms inherit antibiotic resistance, too. I won't quote it as my name is on it - and you'll refute
it out of hand - because you're on Mount Stupid - but the adults in this newsgroup will believe me because, unlike you, I'm well educated in a
variety of fields, one of which is in the biological sciences.

Alan Baker is likewise lying.
So be it.

Nothing more is needed as everything Alan says is an excuse for his lies.
The point was proved the instant he said he was ignorant of what it was.

As is often said an accusation is often but an admission.

There are three facts I can tell you about Alan Baker which we proved:
a. He claims to support customers' computers and yet he is completely
ignorant about newsreader headers to the point that he's overconfident
in his knowledge as shown by his repeated idiocies proven here:
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
Who on earth is _that_ stupid? Nobody. Unless you live on Mount Stupid.

b. He claims to be knowledgeable in BMWs, and yet, he stated he's owned
them for years and yet he's never once heard of the term bimmer/beemer.
Who on earth is _that_ stupid? Nobody. Unless you live on Mount Stupid.

c. He claims to race and to even be a "racing instructor" and yet he can't
fathom how the Newtonian forces of nature which apply to a vertical
catenary apply equally to the centrifugal forces racing around a curve.
In fact, he claims that he's never heard of a catenary, even as claiming
at the same time that he has taken Physics and Calculus classes.
Who on earth is _that_ stupid? Nobody. Unless you live on Mount Stupid.
--
What differentiates you low-IQ uneducated ignorant iKooks from normal
people, Hemidactylus, is each and every iKooks lives atop Mount Stupid.
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/pSJ4OnxviWQ>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)