• Re: The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America Apa

    From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to NefeshBarYochai on Sat May 25 02:00:43 2024
    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:
    https://www.amren.com/features/2024/05/the-respectable-right-discovers-anti-white-hostility/

    Conclusion

    As Mr. Carl writes, white Americans today “suffer from downward
    economic mobility, declining fertility, rising drug addiction and
    depression, and narrowing opportunities, all piled onto a false
    presumption of privilege.” Any vestigial advantages they may still
    derive from belonging to America’s historical majority are “informal
    and evanescent cultural legacies,” whereas “the discrimination they experience is . . . increasingly legal and formal.”

    Obviously, if there were any real “white privilege,” non-whites would
    be trying to “pass” for white (as they once did). Instead, we see a
    flight from white. The reported American Indian population ballooned
    from 0.4 percent in 1970 to nearly 3 percent in 2020, not due to any explosion in fertility but to an increase in Elizabeth Warren-style
    claims aimed at getting non-white privilege.

    Mr. Carl acknowledges that whites are not merely the victims of
    anti-white hostility, but often its most enthusiastic perpetrators. He combines a defense of whites as a group with harsh criticism of these
    white progressives, writing that their “moral mania has made them,
    without question, the most destructive group in American life. No real solution to our racial problems is possible until they either reject
    their current anti-white animus or are removed from their positions of
    power and authority.”

    The endgame of the current system is “the expropriation of land,
    property, and other wealth from whites” and the institution of “a
    permanent regime of anti-white employment and legal discrimination.”
    As of now, he writes, “appeals to expropriation are usually indirect,”
    but over time they “will become more direct and in need of less justification as the political power of white Americans continues to decline.”

    Two developments make this clear. The first is the growing success of
    the reparations movement:

    Black reparations will open the door to massive multi-trillion-dollar payments to any group that can seize the holy grail of victimhood. We
    aren’t going to win this fight by nibbling around the edges, by compromising, or by saying that groups deserve reparations for this
    but not for that. We must pull up root and branch the entire concept
    of mass racial reparations.

    The alternative is likely to be “racial extortion on an unimaginable scale,” possibly leading to “interethnic violence and a collapse of American society.”

    The second recent development is a practice imported from Canada: land acknowledgements. It is no common for institutions built by whites to “acknowledge” that they are on land taken from this or that tribe. As
    the author points out, the entire practice is intellectually
    incoherent, since the particular group whose lands whites occupied
    were seldom or never the first group to hold them. An honest land acknowledgement might sound something like: “Our ancestors took this
    land from the Chippewa, who had previously driven out the Sioux to
    another place where they would go on to massacre the Pawnee,” etc.,
    etc. More importantly, such “acknowledgements” are “an intellectual precursor to expropriation,” and deserve to be taken seriously as
    such.

    Mr. Carl reports that some readers of early drafts of The Unprotected
    Class were enthusiastic about his ideas but felt that “a non-white
    ought to write such a book instead of him.”

    Somehow a white person advancing arguments that white people should be treated fairly was seen as unseemly. It’s an understandable political instinct for anyone who has been involved in American politics in
    recent decades, but ultimately it’s an attitude we need to eliminate.

    It is whites’ failure to organize in defense of our own interests that
    had made the anti-white regime possible. As Mr. Carl writes,
    “non-whites have organized and made powerful demands, while whites
    have focused on broad, gauzy appeals to . . . universal rights” that
    have proven “almost completely ineffective.” It is time for us to make strong demands.

    As noted, we have looked here at only a few of the twelve realms of anti-white discrimination Mr. Carl discusses. The reader should get
    the book itself for the full story. I am unaware of any mainstream
    book on race published since American Renaissance was founded 34 years
    ago that pulls so few punches.


    The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America
    Apart, Regnery Publishing, 2024, 369+xviii pages,


    It’s amazing how many people are willing to perform anilingus on Trump as commanded. These bozos clean his adult diapers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Borax Man@21:1/5 to NefeshBarYochai on Sat May 25 01:18:41 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.food.fast-food

    ["Followup-To:" header set to talk.politics.misc.]
    On 2024-05-24, NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:
    https://www.amren.com/features/2024/05/the-respectable-right-discovers-anti-white-hostility/

    Conclusion

    As Mr. Carl writes, white Americans today “suffer from downward
    economic mobility, declining fertility, rising drug addiction and
    depression, and narrowing opportunities, all piled onto a false
    presumption of privilege.” Any vestigial advantages they may still
    derive from belonging to America’s historical majority are “informal
    and evanescent cultural legacies,” whereas “the discrimination they experience is . . . increasingly legal and formal.”

    Obviously, if there were any real “white privilege,” non-whites would
    be trying to “pass” for white (as they once did). Instead, we see a
    flight from white. The reported American Indian population ballooned
    from 0.4 percent in 1970 to nearly 3 percent in 2020, not due to any explosion in fertility but to an increase in Elizabeth Warren-style
    claims aimed at getting non-white privilege.

    Mr. Carl acknowledges that whites are not merely the victims of
    anti-white hostility, but often its most enthusiastic perpetrators. He combines a defense of whites as a group with harsh criticism of these
    white progressives, writing that their “moral mania has made them,
    without question, the most destructive group in American life. No real solution to our racial problems is possible until they either reject
    their current anti-white animus or are removed from their positions of
    power and authority.”

    The endgame of the current system is “the expropriation of land,
    property, and other wealth from whites” and the institution of “a
    permanent regime of anti-white employment and legal discrimination.”
    As of now, he writes, “appeals to expropriation are usually indirect,”
    but over time they “will become more direct and in need of less justification as the political power of white Americans continues to decline.”

    Two developments make this clear. The first is the growing success of
    the reparations movement:

    Black reparations will open the door to massive multi-trillion-dollar payments to any group that can seize the holy grail of victimhood. We
    aren’t going to win this fight by nibbling around the edges, by compromising, or by saying that groups deserve reparations for this
    but not for that. We must pull up root and branch the entire concept
    of mass racial reparations.

    The alternative is likely to be “racial extortion on an unimaginable scale,” possibly leading to “interethnic violence and a collapse of American society.”

    The second recent development is a practice imported from Canada: land acknowledgements. It is no common for institutions built by whites to “acknowledge” that they are on land taken from this or that tribe. As
    the author points out, the entire practice is intellectually
    incoherent, since the particular group whose lands whites occupied
    were seldom or never the first group to hold them. An honest land acknowledgement might sound something like: “Our ancestors took this
    land from the Chippewa, who had previously driven out the Sioux to
    another place where they would go on to massacre the Pawnee,” etc.,
    etc. More importantly, such “acknowledgements” are “an intellectual precursor to expropriation,” and deserve to be taken seriously as
    such.

    Mr. Carl reports that some readers of early drafts of The Unprotected
    Class were enthusiastic about his ideas but felt that “a non-white
    ought to write such a book instead of him.”

    Somehow a white person advancing arguments that white people should be treated fairly was seen as unseemly. It’s an understandable political instinct for anyone who has been involved in American politics in
    recent decades, but ultimately it’s an attitude we need to eliminate.

    It is whites’ failure to organize in defense of our own interests that
    had made the anti-white regime possible. As Mr. Carl writes,
    “non-whites have organized and made powerful demands, while whites
    have focused on broad, gauzy appeals to . . . universal rights” that
    have proven “almost completely ineffective.” It is time for us to make strong demands.

    As noted, we have looked here at only a few of the twelve realms of anti-white discrimination Mr. Carl discusses. The reader should get
    the book itself for the full story. I am unaware of any mainstream
    book on race published since American Renaissance was founded 34 years
    ago that pulls so few punches.


    The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America
    Apart, Regnery Publishing, 2024, 369+xviii pages,


    Its amusing to see people finally realise that anti-racism has an
    anti-white component to it, given that people were talking about this
    (albeit a very small minority) decades ago.

    Identity politics is here to say. You cannot have a "diverse" society
    without identity politics. White people do not have a choice whether
    to engage or not, their choice is, are they going to stand for their
    own group interests or abandon their group interests and slide
    backwards. Anti-racists are arguing that whites should do the latter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Borax Man on Sat May 25 02:03:53 2024
    Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:
    ["Followup-To:" header set to talk.politics.misc.]
    On 2024-05-24, NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:
    https://www.amren.com/features/2024/05/the-respectable-right-discovers-anti-white-hostility/

    Conclusion

    As Mr. Carl writes, white Americans today “suffer from downward
    economic mobility, declining fertility, rising drug addiction and
    depression, and narrowing opportunities, all piled onto a false
    presumption of privilege.” Any vestigial advantages they may still
    derive from belonging to America’s historical majority are “informal
    and evanescent cultural legacies,” whereas “the discrimination they
    experience is . . . increasingly legal and formal.”

    Obviously, if there were any real “white privilege,” non-whites would
    be trying to “pass” for white (as they once did). Instead, we see a
    flight from white. The reported American Indian population ballooned
    from 0.4 percent in 1970 to nearly 3 percent in 2020, not due to any
    explosion in fertility but to an increase in Elizabeth Warren-style
    claims aimed at getting non-white privilege.

    Mr. Carl acknowledges that whites are not merely the victims of
    anti-white hostility, but often its most enthusiastic perpetrators. He
    combines a defense of whites as a group with harsh criticism of these
    white progressives, writing that their “moral mania has made them,
    without question, the most destructive group in American life. No real
    solution to our racial problems is possible until they either reject
    their current anti-white animus or are removed from their positions of
    power and authority.”

    The endgame of the current system is “the expropriation of land,
    property, and other wealth from whites” and the institution of “a
    permanent regime of anti-white employment and legal discrimination.”
    As of now, he writes, “appeals to expropriation are usually indirect,”
    but over time they “will become more direct and in need of less
    justification as the political power of white Americans continues to
    decline.”

    Two developments make this clear. The first is the growing success of
    the reparations movement:

    Black reparations will open the door to massive multi-trillion-dollar
    payments to any group that can seize the holy grail of victimhood. We
    aren’t going to win this fight by nibbling around the edges, by
    compromising, or by saying that groups deserve reparations for this
    but not for that. We must pull up root and branch the entire concept
    of mass racial reparations.

    The alternative is likely to be “racial extortion on an unimaginable
    scale,” possibly leading to “interethnic violence and a collapse of
    American society.”

    The second recent development is a practice imported from Canada: land
    acknowledgements. It is no common for institutions built by whites to
    “acknowledge” that they are on land taken from this or that tribe. As
    the author points out, the entire practice is intellectually
    incoherent, since the particular group whose lands whites occupied
    were seldom or never the first group to hold them. An honest land
    acknowledgement might sound something like: “Our ancestors took this
    land from the Chippewa, who had previously driven out the Sioux to
    another place where they would go on to massacre the Pawnee,” etc.,
    etc. More importantly, such “acknowledgements” are “an intellectual
    precursor to expropriation,” and deserve to be taken seriously as
    such.

    Mr. Carl reports that some readers of early drafts of The Unprotected
    Class were enthusiastic about his ideas but felt that “a non-white
    ought to write such a book instead of him.”

    Somehow a white person advancing arguments that white people should be
    treated fairly was seen as unseemly. It’s an understandable political
    instinct for anyone who has been involved in American politics in
    recent decades, but ultimately it’s an attitude we need to eliminate.

    It is whites’ failure to organize in defense of our own interests that
    had made the anti-white regime possible. As Mr. Carl writes,
    “non-whites have organized and made powerful demands, while whites
    have focused on broad, gauzy appeals to . . . universal rights” that
    have proven “almost completely ineffective.” It is time for us to make
    strong demands.

    As noted, we have looked here at only a few of the twelve realms of
    anti-white discrimination Mr. Carl discusses. The reader should get
    the book itself for the full story. I am unaware of any mainstream
    book on race published since American Renaissance was founded 34 years
    ago that pulls so few punches.


    The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America
    Apart, Regnery Publishing, 2024, 369+xviii pages,


    Its amusing to see people finally realise that anti-racism has an
    anti-white component to it, given that people were talking about this
    (albeit a very small minority) decades ago.

    Identity politics is here to say. You cannot have a "diverse" society without identity politics. White people do not have a choice whether
    to engage or not, their choice is, are they going to stand for their
    own group interests or abandon their group interests and slide
    backwards. Anti-racists are arguing that whites should do the latter.

    Hey twit, you are a shitstain on humanity posting braindead rants to an
    iPhone group. What is your major malfunction? Incest?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to ecphoric@allspamis.invalid on Sat May 25 16:30:38 2024
    On 2024-05-25, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:

    [a bunch of racist bullshit]

    It’s amazing how many people are willing to perform anilingus on Trump
    as commanded. These bozos clean his adult diapers.

    These dip shits would literally eat Trump's shit if it meant the rest of
    us had to smell their breath.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sun May 26 00:58:02 2024
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2024-05-25, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:

    [a bunch of racist bullshit]

    It’s amazing how many people are willing to perform anilingus on Trump
    as commanded. These bozos clean his adult diapers.

    These dip shits would literally eat Trump's shit if it meant the rest of
    us had to smell their breath.

    They get their jollies coal rolling diesel trucks which is about the same asinine behavior as seeing them display their dreck on these mass
    crossposts. Seems mostly Aryan Christian nationalists and other assorted rednecks from the swamps of the US southeast or Idaho/eastern Washington
    state. They probably still think Obama is a Muslim Commie sharing a bunker
    with George Soros masterminding Trump’s downfall while Hillary supplies newborn blood saturated with adrenochrome.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kill the Progs@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sun May 26 00:14:27 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.food.fast-food

    On 5/25/24 10:30 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-05-25, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:

    [a bunch of racist bullshit]

    It’s amazing how many people are willing to perform anilingus on Trump
    as commanded. These bozos clean his adult diapers.

    These dip shits would literally eat Trump's shit if it meant the rest of
    us had to smell their breath.


    No, we would force-feed YOU Trump's shit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ed Pawlowski@21:1/5 to Kill the Progs on Sun May 26 00:34:49 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    On 5/26/2024 12:14 AM, Kill the Progs wrote:
    On 5/25/24 10:30 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-05-25, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:

    [a bunch of racist bullshit]

    It’s amazing how many people are willing to perform anilingus on Trump >>> as commanded. These bozos clean his adult diapers.

    These dip shits would literally eat Trump's shit if it meant the rest of
    us had to smell their breath.


    No, we would force-feed YOU Trump's shit.


    Yes, you are a rather classy group of his worshipers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Kill the Progs on Sun May 26 18:57:34 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.food.fast-food

    On 2024-05-26, Kill the Progs <kill_the_progs@lynch.confederacy> wrote:
    On 5/25/24 10:30 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-05-25, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:

    [a bunch of racist bullshit]

    It’s amazing how many people are willing to perform anilingus on
    Trump as commanded. These bozos clean his adult diapers.

    These dip shits would literally eat Trump's shit if it meant the rest
    of us had to smell their breath.

    No, we would force-feed YOU Trump's shit.

    Come and try it, snowflake. My guns are chambered and ready.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DELL@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Mon May 27 16:44:50 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    On 2024-05-26, Kill the Progs <kill_the_progs@lynch.confederacy>
    wrote:
    On 5/25/24 10:30 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-05-25, Hemidactylus <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:

    [a bunch of racist bullshit]

    It’s amazing how many people are willing to perform anilingus on
    Trump as commanded. These bozos clean his adult diapers.

    These dip shits would literally eat Trump's shit if it meant the
    rest >> of us had to smell their breath.

    No, we would force-feed YOU Trump's shit.

    Come and try it, snowflake. My guns are chambered and ready.

    Get lost multi group spammer

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kill the Progs@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Tue May 28 21:35:31 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.food.fast-food

    On 5/26/24 12:57 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-05-26, Kill the Progs <kill_the_progs@lynch.confederacy> wrote:
    On 5/25/24 10:30 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-05-25, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:

    [a bunch of racist bullshit]

    It’s amazing how many people are willing to perform anilingus on
    Trump as commanded. These bozos clean his adult diapers.

    These dip shits would literally eat Trump's shit if it meant the rest
    of us had to smell their breath.

    No, we would force-feed YOU Trump's shit.

    Come and try it, snowflake. My guns are chambered and ready.


    You're a shitlib. You most likely have no guns. Nor do you deserve them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Kill the Progs on Wed May 29 15:36:40 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.food.fast-food

    On 2024-05-29, Kill the Progs <kill_the_progs@lynch.confederacy> wrote:
    On 5/26/24 12:57 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-05-26, Kill the Progs <kill_the_progs@lynch.confederacy> wrote:
    On 5/25/24 10:30 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-05-25, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:

    [a bunch of racist bullshit]

    It’s amazing how many people are willing to perform anilingus on
    Trump as commanded. These bozos clean his adult diapers.

    These dip shits would literally eat Trump's shit if it meant the
    rest of us had to smell their breath.

    No, we would force-feed YOU Trump's shit.

    Come and try it, snowflake. My guns are chambered and ready.

    You're a shitlib. You most likely have no guns. Nor do you deserve
    them.

    I ain't liberal, and you show up at my doorstep, you'll be gone before
    you know what hit you, pussy.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D. Ray@21:1/5 to NefeshBarYochai on Wed May 29 18:46:35 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, rec.food.cooking, soc.culture.usa
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.food.fast-food

    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:
    https://www.amren.com/features/2024/05/the-respectable-right-discovers-anti-white-hostility/

    Conclusion

    As Mr. Carl writes, white Americans today “suffer from downward
    economic mobility, declining fertility, rising drug addiction and
    depression, and narrowing opportunities, all piled onto a false
    presumption of privilege.” Any vestigial advantages they may still
    derive from belonging to America’s historical majority are “informal
    and evanescent cultural legacies,” whereas “the discrimination they experience is . . . increasingly legal and formal.”

    Obviously, if there were any real “white privilege,” non-whites would
    be trying to “pass” for white (as they once did). Instead, we see a
    flight from white. The reported American Indian population ballooned
    from 0.4 percent in 1970 to nearly 3 percent in 2020, not due to any explosion in fertility but to an increase in Elizabeth Warren-style
    claims aimed at getting non-white privilege.

    Mr. Carl acknowledges that whites are not merely the victims of
    anti-white hostility, but often its most enthusiastic perpetrators. He combines a defense of whites as a group with harsh criticism of these
    white progressives, writing that their “moral mania has made them,
    without question, the most destructive group in American life. No real solution to our racial problems is possible until they either reject
    their current anti-white animus or are removed from their positions of
    power and authority.”

    The endgame of the current system is “the expropriation of land,
    property, and other wealth from whites” and the institution of “a
    permanent regime of anti-white employment and legal discrimination.”
    As of now, he writes, “appeals to expropriation are usually indirect,”
    but over time they “will become more direct and in need of less justification as the political power of white Americans continues to decline.”

    Two developments make this clear. The first is the growing success of
    the reparations movement:

    Black reparations will open the door to massive multi-trillion-dollar payments to any group that can seize the holy grail of victimhood. We
    aren’t going to win this fight by nibbling around the edges, by compromising, or by saying that groups deserve reparations for this
    but not for that. We must pull up root and branch the entire concept
    of mass racial reparations.

    The alternative is likely to be “racial extortion on an unimaginable scale,” possibly leading to “interethnic violence and a collapse of American society.”

    The second recent development is a practice imported from Canada: land acknowledgements. It is no common for institutions built by whites to “acknowledge” that they are on land taken from this or that tribe. As
    the author points out, the entire practice is intellectually
    incoherent, since the particular group whose lands whites occupied
    were seldom or never the first group to hold them. An honest land acknowledgement might sound something like: “Our ancestors took this
    land from the Chippewa, who had previously driven out the Sioux to
    another place where they would go on to massacre the Pawnee,” etc.,
    etc. More importantly, such “acknowledgements” are “an intellectual precursor to expropriation,” and deserve to be taken seriously as
    such.

    Mr. Carl reports that some readers of early drafts of The Unprotected
    Class were enthusiastic about his ideas but felt that “a non-white
    ought to write such a book instead of him.”

    Somehow a white person advancing arguments that white people should be treated fairly was seen as unseemly. It’s an understandable political instinct for anyone who has been involved in American politics in
    recent decades, but ultimately it’s an attitude we need to eliminate.

    It is whites’ failure to organize in defense of our own interests that
    had made the anti-white regime possible. As Mr. Carl writes,
    “non-whites have organized and made powerful demands, while whites
    have focused on broad, gauzy appeals to . . . universal rights” that
    have proven “almost completely ineffective.” It is time for us to make strong demands.

    As noted, we have looked here at only a few of the twelve realms of anti-white discrimination Mr. Carl discusses. The reader should get
    the book itself for the full story. I am unaware of any mainstream
    book on race published since American Renaissance was founded 34 years
    ago that pulls so few punches.


    The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America
    Apart, Regnery Publishing, 2024, 369+xviii pages,

    They recently discussed this book on WarStrike podcast:

    “WarStrike Episode 31: Discussion on Jeremy Carl's Unprotected Class”

    <https://odysee.com/@WarStrike:a/Episode31:4>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)