XPost: alt.politics.republicans, alt.journalism.newspapers, talk.politics.guns XPost: sac.politics
On 06 Feb 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <
j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some news:vo33lh$33i19$
4@dont-email.me:
On 2/6/2025 9:17 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:49n8qj5jhvcqno7sr6eobrvartth7348on@4ax.com...
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 05 Feb 2025 19:44:00 -0500, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be
forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable >>>>>>>> for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in
women's spaces. It's always stunted-growth,
arrested-development bitches who are the TERFs. They can fuck
off.
You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to
define a woman.
Well it's not the easiest thing to answer verbally, in a session
like the judiciary committee would've had with her. As with a
lot of things, "you know it when you see it" - my GF has a cock
and two balls, but you'd never think that meeting her clothed.
Any guy can put on a dress.
If you have a dick, you go there. If not, you go here.
NEXT!
That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
him*,
You unethically edited my post.
Of course I did, scooter.
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". It's just some cross-dressing
queer trying to game stupid people.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)