• Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20,

    From Your Name@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Tue May 27 14:04:32 2025
    On 2025-05-26 21:30:49 +0000, Tyrone said:
    On May 26, 2025 at 4:59:21 PM EDT, "Hank" <hankrobins@notspam.uk> wrote:
    On 5/26/2025 10:55 PM, Alan wrote:
    But when examining how long a battery's life will be, you need to
    examine both the battery's capacity...

    All iphones failed the eu's minimum battery life test when first proposed. >> Take it up with the eu if you want them to change the test just for apple.

    Source?

    Pulled from his backside, like every other piece of idiotic nonsense
    the moronic name-changing troll spouts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Your Name on Tue May 27 02:54:13 2025
    On May 26, 2025 at 10:04:32 PM EDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    On 2025-05-26 21:30:49 +0000, Tyrone said:
    On May 26, 2025 at 4:59:21 PM EDT, "Hank" <hankrobins@notspam.uk> wrote: >>> On 5/26/2025 10:55 PM, Alan wrote:
    But when examining how long a battery's life will be, you need to
    examine both the battery's capacity...

    All iphones failed the eu's minimum battery life test when first proposed. >>> Take it up with the eu if you want them to change the test just for apple. >>
    Source?

    Pulled from his backside, like every other piece of idiotic nonsense
    the moronic name-changing troll spouts.

    Yes, I know.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Thu Jul 3 22:35:16 2025
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 20:10:53 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote :


    Is it just the word ´dismal¡ you object to or are you dismissing the fact
    that Apple batteries are inferior because a B grade is better than a C or D >> grade?

    I object to the use of "dismal". If they are grade "B", there are worse classifications, as C, D, E...

    You don't like the word dismal?

    Then pick any word you like for Apple lying to you about iPhone efficiency.

    Deceitful... duplicitous... despicable... dishonest... disassembling... deceptive... discrepant...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Thu Jul 3 22:38:12 2025
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 15:55:15 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote :


    Is it just the word ´dismal¡ you object to or are you dismissing the fact that Apple batteries are inferior because a B grade is better than a C or D grade?

    Hi badgolferman,

    The Apple trolls think the point is that the iPhone earned a B.
    That's not the point.

    Or, the Apple trolls think they can get around the lousy score by using a different adjective for why Apple lied all these years about efficiency.

    The point is Apple lied.
    Apple said, for years, they had better efficiency.

    Yeah, sure. Better efficiency than a twenty-dollar Android perhaps.
    But almost every Android OEM had better efficiency than the iPhone.


    That's the point.
    Apple lied.

    There is no efficiency.
    I'm shocked. Shocked I say.

    How could Apple have lied to us all these years.
    That's the point.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)