1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. MISC.PHONE.MOBILE.IPHONE

  • =?UTF-8?Q?Qualcomm_5G_Modem_Versus_Apple_C1_Modem_=E2=94=80_Qualcom?= =

    From sms@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 27 15:23:32 2025
    <https://www.phonearena.com/news/test-shows-qualcomm-5g-modems-faster-than-apples-c1_id170803>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to sms on Tue May 27 16:21:31 2025
    On 2025-05-27 15:23, sms wrote:
    <https://www.phonearena.com/news/test-shows-qualcomm-5g-modems-faster- than-apples-c1_id170803>

    'A test run by Cellular Insights and PAID FOR BY Qualcomm'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed May 28 06:57:42 2025
    On 28.05.25 01:21, Alan wrote:
    https://www.phonearena.com/news/test-shows-qualcomm-5g-modems-faster- than-apples-c1_id170803

    Fake news spreader and spin doctor Steven Scharf is on the road again:

    Many criticized the above test, which *showed the C1 modem to be 40%
    faster* than Qualcomm's modem chip. Some noted that the results might
    have been influenced by the location of the test, which was in Toronto, Canada.

    The whole issue is completely irrelvant and ridiculous.

    Nota bene: Nobody needs gateways to the internet.

    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed May 28 15:13:28 2025
    On 2025-05-27, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2025-05-27 15:23, sms wrote:
    <https://www.phonearena.com/news/test-shows-qualcomm-5g-modems-faster-
    than-apples-c1_id170803>

    'A test run by Cellular Insights and PAID FOR BY Qualcomm'

    LOL...

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Wed May 28 16:01:02 2025
    On 28 May 2025 15:13:28 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    'A test run by Cellular Insights and PAID FOR BY Qualcomm'

    LOL

    Given Apple has never made a best-in-class chip in their history,
    what makes these Apple trolls so confident to 'diss Qualcomm, who has?

    a. Apple's C1 modem has no mmWave 5G
    b. Wi-Fi 6 Only (i.e., the C1 has no Wi-Fi 7)
    c. Fewer downlink carrier aggregation bands
    d. No Uplink Carrier Aggregation and Uplink MIMO
    e. Low performance under stress of urban environments
    f. Already has a baseband flaw
    <https://cyberscoop.com/apple-security-update-c1-modem-privacy-fixes-may-2025/>

    In summary, the way Apple's (rather brilliantly unapologetic) Marketing
    puts it, the Apple C1 can't do much, but it's efficient at doing nothing.

    HINT: An Apple SOC with unpatchable flaws, is NOT best in class, no matter
    how desperate you Apple trolls are to claim Apple's SOCs are not garbage.

    If you can find even a SINGLE Apple best-in-class chip, let us all know.
    We've been waiting for a loooooong time for Apple's design teams to do it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed May 28 14:27:11 2025
    On 2025-05-28 09:01, Marion wrote:
    On 28 May 2025 15:13:28 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    'A test run by Cellular Insights and PAID FOR BY Qualcomm'

    LOL

    Given Apple has never made a best-in-class chip in their history,
    what makes these Apple trolls so confident to 'diss Qualcomm, who has?

    All of Apple's "A" series chips are widely acknowledged as best-in-class.


    a. Apple's C1 modem has no mmWave 5G
    b. Wi-Fi 6 Only (i.e., the C1 has no Wi-Fi 7)

    And you demonstrate your ignorance again.

    The C1 modem isn't responsible for WiFi connectivity at all...

    ...which is the same for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X75 5G it was tested
    against.

    <https://www.qualcomm.com/products/technology/modems/snapdragon-x75-5g-modem-rf-system#blockdiagram>

    c. Fewer downlink carrier aggregation bands
    d. No Uplink Carrier Aggregation and Uplink MIMO
    e. Low performance under stress of urban environments
    f. Already has a baseband flaw
    <https://cyberscoop.com/apple-security-update-c1-modem-privacy-fixes-may-2025/>

    In summary, the way Apple's (rather brilliantly unapologetic) Marketing
    puts it, the Apple C1 can't do much, but it's efficient at doing nothing.

    HINT: An Apple SOC with unpatchable flaws, is NOT best in class, no matter how desperate you Apple trolls are to claim Apple's SOCs are not garbage.

    HINT: nothing you have referenced claims an "unpatchable flaw" in anything.


    If you can find even a SINGLE Apple best-in-class chip, let us all know. We've been waiting for a loooooong time for Apple's design teams to do it.

    Hey! Do you remember when you used to insist that Apple didn't actually
    do any design?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)