• 8 things we learned from the iPhone energy labels Apple was forced to a

    From Marion@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 21 01:15:04 2025
    8 things we learned from the iPhone energy labels Apple was forced to add
    in Europe <https://bgr.com/tech/8-things-we-learned-from-the-iphone-energy-labels-apple-was-forced-to-add-in-europe/>

    We've known for a while that Apple would be adding energy and battery
    labels to the iPhone and iPad in Europe, and that moment is finally here.
    As a European who isn't a fan of the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA) ruining
    the iPhone in the region, I actually don't mind this particular initiative.

    It's not that I necessarily need to know how much electricity my iPhone and iPad consume, or how energy efficient they might be. Buy a fridge, washing machine, or big-screen TV, and that information matters. The iPhone and
    iPad's energy consumption is negligible.

    Still, the new energy and battery labels Apple started placing on its
    product pages for the iPhone and iPad in Europe reveal a few other
    interesting details about these devices.

    The new labels are visible on Apple's iPhone and iPad product pages, as
    seen below. Tap the label and you get a PDF page for each product that
    reveals plenty of additional details. It's not just about how
    energy-efficient the iPhone and iPad are. You'll get actual figures for
    battery life, battery capacity, and even years of software support.

    Apple explained in an accompanying document how it tested the iPhone and
    iPad. The company notes that it decided to downgrade the iPhone's energy efficiency from an "A" to a "B" since some of the testing methods the EU
    offers are ambiguous.

    Most iPads get a "G" rating, while the iPad mini is slightly more efficient with its "E" label.

    Real battery life

    Energy and battery labels appear right under the product name.
    Energy and battery labels appear right under the product name. Image
    source: Apple Inc.
    Whenever Apple announces a new iPhone, it makes sure to give us battery estimates for specific activities to show that the newest iPhone can last longer than previous models. The figures aren't necessarily accurate for real-life usage.

    The new energy and battery labels finally give us better figures. Here are
    the battery estimates for the iPhones Apple currently sells in the EU:

    iPhone 16 Pro Max - 48 hours 0 minutes
    iPhone 16 Pro - 37 hours 0 minutes
    iPhone 16 Plus - 48 hours 0 minutes
    iPhone 16 - 37 hours 0 minutes
    iPhone 16e - 41 hours 0 minutes
    iPhone 15 Plus - 45 hours 0 minutes
    iPhone 15 - 34 hours 0 minutes
    You'll get similar figures for all the iPads in the region.

    Real battery capacity

    As is the case with battery life, Apple never lists the battery capacities
    for its iPhones. That changes in Europe, where it's forced to show the
    battery capacities in the same document. They match teardowns and leaks,
    which is how we used to find battery capacity for each new iPhone model.

    iPhone 16 Pro Max - 4,685 mAh
    iPhone 16 Pro - 3,582 mAh
    iPhone 16 Plus - 4,674 mAh
    iPhone 16 - 3,561 mAh
    iPhone 16e - 4,005 mAh
    iPhone 15 Plus - 4,383 mAh
    iPhone 15 - 3,349 mAh

    How many battery cycles are safe?
    We don't want just long battery life from the iPhone and iPad. We want the battery to last as long as possible without degrading to the point it needs replacing.

    Apple's new documents say the iPhone 16 models have a battery endurance of
    over 1,000 cycles. That means the battery will hold at least 80% charge for 1,000 cycles. Recharge the phone every day, and you'll get about three
    years of use.

    How many years of software updates does it get?
    Apple routinely supports its iPhones and iPads with at least five years of
    new iOS updates, though it doesn't always spell that out. The EU's energy
    and battery labels now explicitly mention it. iPhones get at least five
    years of "operating system security updates, corrective updates and functionality updates."

    How likely is it to survive drops?

    A label example for the iPhone 16 Pro.
    A label example for the iPhone 16 Pro. Image source: Apple Inc.
    The energy and battery labels also cover durability. For example, iPhones
    get a "C" grade for surviving drops. "A" is best, "E" is worst. Larger
    iPads get an "E" rating, so try not to drop them.

    How easy is it to scratch the screen?

    Remember those popular durability videos that YouTube channel JerryRigEverything puts out after each new smartphone launch? One of the
    tests is screen hardness. The YouTuber uses various picks to see how easily
    the iPhone will scratch.

    Now, Apple finally provides that figure. The iPhone scores a 4 on the Mohs hardness scale, which shows how scratch-resistant the display is.

    What submersion depth will it survive?

    Drop the iPhone in water, and it's likely to survive. The handsets come
    with IP68 ratings, which means they're resistant to drops and dust.

    Apple usually highlights this during product launches, especially when it improves immersion specs. The new label documents mention the maximum
    immersion depth for each device. For the iPhone 16, that's 6 meters, or
    about 18 feet.

    The iPad doesn't get the same IP68 rating, so don't take it underwater.

    How easy is it to repair?

    Finally, the iPhone and iPad energy and battery labels confirm what we've
    long suspected. iPhones aren't that easy to repair, with a "C" rating on
    the A-to-E scale. The iPad fares slightly better with a "B."

    You'll find these new documents on all iPhone and iPad pages across Apple's
    EU websites. Ireland's Apple online store is your best bet for
    documentation in English, which could be handy for buyers from other
    markets.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Jul 21 01:40:58 2025
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 9:15:04 PM EDT, "Marion" <marion@facts.com> wrote:

    8 things we learned from the iPhone energy labels Apple was forced to add
    in Europe

    We learned that:

    1. iPhones are incredibly efficient compared to Android junk
    2. You are a liar
    3. iPhones are incredibly efficient compared to Android junk
    4. You are a liar
    5 iPhones are incredibly efficient compared to Android junk
    6. You are a liar
    7. iPhones are incredibly efficient compared to Android junk
    8. You are a liar

    Others can feel free to add to this.

    BTW, 2, 4, 6 and 8 cover every claim you have ever made here.

    Apple "found guilty" in France? Never happened. France OFFERED TO SETTLE.

    SMB servers "impossible on iOS". Nope.

    "Apple sends out the entire iOS even if only a single line of code was changed"? Absurd.

    "iPhones are horribly insecure"? Nope.

    "iPhones are horribly inefficient"? Nope.

    "Every app on your iPad will eventually die"? Absurd.

    "I am a scientist". Laughingly absurd.

    "Amazon pays me for something"? Still laughing at that one.

    At least you DO have some comic value. But that is all you have ever added here, other than constant noise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Mon Jul 21 15:09:00 2025
    On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 01:40:58 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    8 things we learned from the iPhone energy labels Apple was forced to add
    in Europe

    We learned that:

    1. iPhones are incredibly efficient compared to Android junk

    Why is it that after years of Apple claiming a superior efficiency to
    justify their laughably puny el cheapo garbage batteries, the EU tests that everyone agreed to proved that almost every OEM was able to achieve an A.

    Except Apple.

    Q: Where is that efficiency Apple has been advertising for years?
    A: It doesn't exist.

    Apple lied.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)