Andy Burnelli wrote:

If you're seeing ads, and especially if you're seeing TARGETED ads,
you're on iOS (because Android doesn't show ads on it anymore).

If you're seeing ads, especially targeted ads - you're on iOS (not
Android).
Ask me how I know this.

OK, How do you know that Arlen?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2023-02-07 16:15, Hank Rogers wrote:

Andy Burnelli wrote:

If you're seeing ads, and especially if you're seeing TARGETED ads,
you're on iOS (because Android doesn't show ads on it anymore).

If you're seeing ads, especially targeted ads - you're on iOS (not
Android).
Ask me how I know this.

OK, How do you know that Arlen?

"...[something, something] adult..."

😜

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Andy Burnelli wrote:

nospam wrote:

there is zero evidence to support any of those and ample evidence
that
they're all crazy fantasy.

Look nospam.

You have no dignity. No honor. No credibility. No remorse. No shame.

Yeah, and he has no books either!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hank Rogers wrote:

You have no dignity. No honor. No credibility. No remorse. No shame.

Yeah, and he has no books either!

Look. Either back up your claims of imaginary iOS functionality with cites,
or forever prove that you _hate_ that if you're seeing ads, you're on iOS.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

Hank Rogers wrote:

You have no dignity. No honor. No credibility. No remorse. No shame.

Yeah, and he has no books either!

Look. Either back up your claims of imaginary iOS functionality with cites, or forever prove that you _hate_ that if you're seeing ads, you're on iOS.

I'm not seeing personalised ads on iOS. What am I doing wrong?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Am 08.02.23 um 08:48 schrieb Chris:

Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

Hank Rogers wrote:

You have no dignity. No honor. No credibility. No remorse. No shame.

Yeah, and he has no books either!

Look. Either back up your claims of imaginary iOS functionality with cites, >> or forever prove that you _hate_ that if you're seeing ads, you're on iOS.

I'm not seeing personalised ads on iOS. What am I doing wrong?

Same question here. Never seen on my Apple devices over the last 17
years. What is wrong?

Android is quite different. Each app thinks it has the right to torture
me with irrelevant ads. Every time is use it.

--
Gutta cavat lapidem (Ovid)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2023-02-08, Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:

Am 08.02.23 um 08:48 schrieb Chris:

Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

Hank Rogers wrote:

You have no dignity. No honor. No credibility. No remorse. No
shame.

Yeah, and he has no books either!

Look. Either back up your claims of imaginary iOS functionality with
cites, or forever prove that you _hate_ that if you're seeing ads,
you're on iOS.

I'm not seeing personalised ads on iOS. What am I doing wrong?

Same question here. Never seen on my Apple devices over the last 17
years. What is wrong?

None of us are seeing them - must be a conspiracy! ; )

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 7:48:27 AM, Chris wrote:

I'm not seeing personalised ads on iOS. What am I doing wrong?

If the ads you see are for Ostrich Pillows, then they're personalized.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2023-02-08, Thomas <canope234@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 7:48:27 AM, Chris wrote:

I'm not seeing personalised ads on iOS. What am I doing wrong?

If the ads you see are for Ostrich Pillows, then they're personalized.

Nope, none of those either. Baseless lies are all you loser zealots
have going for you. : )

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Thomas <canope234@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 7:48:27 AM, Chris wrote:

I'm not seeing personalised ads on iOS. What am I doing wrong?

If the ads you see are for Ostrich Pillows, then they're personalized.

Ostrich? Pah! Peacock feathers only here thank you very much!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Andy Burnelli wrote:

Chris wrote:

I'll repeat my question from before. I'm not seeing any
personalised ads on
my iphone, what am I doing wrong?
Oh no! Has my phone been hacked?!
Is there some open source, freeware, no ads, no calling to
mothership
anti-malware app I can run to fix my phone?

Hi Chris,

First off, I apologize for the broken-up URLs where I thought
people would be intelligent enough to figure that's to foil lousy
"badurl" nntp filters.

But apparently the iKooks completely whoosh on all obvious facts
and concentrate instead on what amounts to purposeful typos to fix
bad url filters (I have no control over what the nntp server
considers bad urls).

Anyway, I clearly understand that you "said" you're not seeing
_targeted_ ads, which, may or may not be true because you don't
know how to tell.

Nobody does.
But let's assume you're right for the first time in your entire
life, Chris (although I remember you claiming a PhD which you
clearly lied about).

Let's assume, Chris - that either you're too stupid to recognize a
targeted ad, or, even that by pure luck, you haven't actually
received targeted ads.

Good for you.
But that still doesn't change the main point one bit.

 *If you're seeing _any_ ads, then you're on iOS* (not Android).

The reason has been supplied in the half dozen URLs that I
previously provided where the ad blocking functionality of iOS is
clearly crippled.

It's hopeless man. Most all iphone users are dumbass children.
Engineers and adults know to use only android. But they must still
buy shitty toy iphones for their young ignorant children.

When the children get older, you can buy them some books and an
android telephone. They catch on pretty quick.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

nospam wrote:

In article <g3f8uh9cfs9ph8o810peu72irbhnp7h8ok@4ax.com>, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:

In article <trv6em$i2g0$1@paganini.bofh.team>, Andy Burnelli
<nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

I'm an adult. I'm intelligent. I'm honest. I'm credible. Informative.

there is zero evidence to support any of those and ample evidence that
they're all crazy fantasy.

I think he's probably an adult.

chronologically perhaps, but not cognitively or behaviorally.

Hell, who knows. Maybe he's an android "developer".

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <H_XEL.664812$iU59.523811@fx14.iad>, Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid> wrote:

In article <trv6em$i2g0$1@paganini.bofh.team>, Andy Burnelli
<nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

I'm an adult. I'm intelligent. I'm honest. I'm credible. Informative. >>>

there is zero evidence to support any of those and ample evidence that >>> they're all crazy fantasy.

I think he's probably an adult.

chronologically perhaps, but not cognitively or behaviorally.

Hell, who knows. Maybe he's an android "developer".

he's not.

he tried, but could not get sample code to build.

that is a significant obstacle to developing actual apps.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Andy Burnelli wrote:

nospam wrote:

very simple.

Don't call me a liar because *_you_ don't know how iOS works*, nospam.

Maybe you're not a liar, but you're certainly full of shit.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hank Rogers wrote:

Don't call me a liar because *_you_ don't know how iOS works*, nospam.

Maybe you're not a liar, but you're certainly full of shit.

And yet, never, not even once in the history of this newsgroup, have you or anyone else on this ng ever shown any fact from me to be wrong.

If you could, you would; yet you don't - because you can't.

With that, I put you back on plonk as I thought you had matured.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

Hank Rogers wrote:

Don't call me a liar because *_you_ don't know how iOS works*, nospam.

Maybe you're not a liar, but you're certainly full of shit.

And yet, never, not even once in the history of this newsgroup, have you or anyone else on this ng ever shown any fact from me to be wrong.

That's an actual lie. I and several others have shown you to be wrong about many things.

You've also chickened out of proving all your "college degrees". All you
can show is photos of some (very old) text books. So all that can be
deduced is you're lying about that as well.

If you could, you would; yet you don't - because you can't.

What usually happens is you don't acknowledge it and then disappear for a
bit hoping that no-one will notice.

With that, I put you back on plonk as I thought you had matured.

Spoken like the true child you are.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2023-02-11, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

Hank Rogers wrote:

Don't call me a liar because *_you_ don't know how iOS works*,
nospam.

Maybe you're not a liar, but you're certainly full of shit.

And yet, never, not even once in the history of this newsgroup, have
you or anyone else on this ng ever shown any fact from me to be
wrong.

That's an actual lie. I and several others have shown you to be wrong
about many things.

Yep, and when confronted, he turns into a broken record, spamming the
same, long, tired, insult-laden diatribes that don't actually do
anything at all to dispute challenges to his lies. It's pathetic every
time.

You've also chickened out of proving all your "college degrees". All
you can show is photos of some (very old) text books. So all that can
be deduced is you're lying about that as well.

He hasn't proved any of his claims through the years. He frequently
confuses opinion for fact. And anyone who questions his claims is
automatically accused of trolling and insulted. He's a huge man-child.

If you could, you would; yet you don't - because you can't.

What usually happens is you don't acknowledge it and then disappear
for a bit hoping that no-one will notice.

With that, I put you back on plonk as I thought you had matured.

Spoken like the true child you are.

He also won't actually plonk you, because he's all bark, no bite. ; )

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Chris wrote:

You've also chickened out of proving all your "college degrees". All you
can show is photos of some (very old) text books. So all that can be
deduced is you're lying about that as well.

Chris,
I feel sorry for you that people called you stupid your whole life.
*One of the reasons you're stupid, Chris - is you have no memory.*

Your memory is atrocious since we have entire threads on this topic, where
I long ago emailed Steve my college degree information where he was told to
not publish my name but he was welcome to publish the rest of the stuff.

You want that information - get it from Steve because you wouldn't
believe it if it came from me anyway - so that's why I sent it to Steve.

You're stupid Chris, because you don't even remember we did all this.

If you could, you would; yet you don't - because you can't.

What usually happens is you don't acknowledge it and then disappear for a
bit hoping that no-one will notice.

Everything you say is _why_ people called you stupid your whole life.

The fact remains if you could find a single case of me stating an incorrect fact (which wasn't just a thinko or one that I didnt' immediately
acknowledge, usually profusely as it could be by pure accident), you
wouild.

Just say what it is, Chris. Otherwise, you're lying (again), Chris.
*You don't list any wrong facts. Because you can't.*

My credibility is stellar, Chris.
Not because I'm smarter than all of you combined.

But because I don't say a fact if it's not well known already.

Stupid people like you, Chris, say all sorts of things you don't
understand. You're extremely confident in your stupidity, Chris.

It's why people your whole life have been calling you stupid, Chris.
Not just me.

With that, I put you back on plonk as I thought you had matured.

Spoken like the true child you are.

You're the one who lied about having a PhD and then you ridiculed classic
words used all the time in immunology, Chris - like a small child would.

Remember, I have a steel trap of a memory, Chris.
*Does "vehicle" ring a bell?*

HINT: Your IQ is about 50, Chris, and partly due to your lies where
you, like all iKooks, own no shame. No honor. No decency.

It's why you've been told your whole life that you're stupid, Chris.
You don't remember that we covered all this in depth already, Chris.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

Chris wrote:

You've also chickened out of proving all your "college degrees". All you
can show is photos of some (very old) text books. So all that can be
deduced is you're lying about that as well.

Chris,
I feel sorry for you that people called you stupid your whole life.
*One of the reasons you're stupid, Chris - is you have no memory.*

Lol. I must have touched a nerve.

Your memory is atrocious since we have entire threads on this topic, where
I long ago emailed Steve my college degree information where he was told to not publish my name but he was welcome to publish the rest of the stuff.

I never saw that.

You want that information - get it from Steve because you wouldn't
believe it if it came from me anyway - so that's why I sent it to Steve.

Why is Steve a more trustworthy source? Why are you hiding behind him? I offered to show my degree if you showed yours...

You're stupid Chris, because you don't even remember we did all this.

Not possible to remember something I wasn't involved in.

If you could, you would; yet you don't - because you can't.

What usually happens is you don't acknowledge it and then disappear for a
bit hoping that no-one will notice.

Everything you say is _why_ people called you stupid your whole life.

The fact remains if you could find a single case of me stating an incorrect fact (which wasn't just a thinko or one that I didnt' immediately acknowledge, usually profusely as it could be by pure accident), you
wouild.

Just say what it is, Chris. Otherwise, you're lying (again), Chris.
*You don't list any wrong facts. Because you can't.*

Remind us all how incredibly huge the SARS-CoV-2 ssRNA genome is?

My credibility is stellar, Chris.

Second only to your hubris, I bet.

Not because I'm smarter than all of you combined.

Certainly true.

But because I don't say a fact if it's not well known already.

You confuse opinion with facts on a regular basis. Also extrapolation or inference are not facts either.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)