• Re: Navarro indicted for contempt of Congress after defying Jan. 6 pane

    From Nutless Buzz Lightyear@21:1/5 to bob.mccormick@realtor.com on Thu Jun 16 13:23:45 2022
    XPost: alt.politics.libertarian, alt.politics.republicans, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    In article <XnsAC8C8293395DAsoetoro@95.216.243.224>
    bob.mccormick@realtor.com wrote:


    I believe Biden is insane. Facts speak for themselves.


    The Justice Department has indicted Peter Navarro, a former
    trade adviser to Donald Trump, for contempt of Congress after he
    defied a subpoena from the Jan. 6 select committee.

    After Trump’s defeat in the 2020 election, Navarro became an
    early advocate for the former president’s false claims of
    widespread election fraud and spearheaded efforts to overturn
    the election. He’s been charged with two counts of contempt,
    each of which carries a maximum sentence of one year in prison.

    The U.S. House committee investigating the Capitol insurrection
    subpoenaed Navarro in February and he tersely refused to comply,
    claiming sweeping executive privilege over his efforts.
    Following his appearance in court Friday afternoon, Navarro told
    reporters he had been arrested “getting on the plane” to
    Nashville and was put in handcuffs and leg irons.

    “They just came with the full force of the federal government
    and put the hammer down trying to intimidate me,” he said,
    calling the Justice Department “wrong on all manner of counts.”
    The former Trump adviser is scheduled to be back in court on
    June 17 for his arraignment.

    The indictment marks the first criminal charges related to the
    Jan. 6 investigation against a person who was serving in Trump’s
    White House during the former president’s attempts to overturn
    the 2020 election results. Steve Bannon, who left the White
    House in 2017 and similarly refused to comply with a select
    committee subpoena, was charged last year with two counts of
    contempt. He is set to go on trial in July. While the Justice
    Department’s decision to charge both Bannon and Navarro is a
    break from history, it’s even more rare for such cases to result
    in convictions.

    The contempt case is the latest effort by DOJ to bolster the
    work of the select committee. And it represents another test of
    the department’s handling of a politically explosive case — one
    that intersects with congressional subpoenas, executive
    privilege and longstanding DOJ internal precedent centered on
    White House advisers’ immunity from compelled testimony.

    Bannon has argued in court filings that his refusal to comply
    was simply a reflection of DOJ’s longstanding guidance on
    congressional subpoenas. But prosecutors rejected that
    contention and said his case was not comparable to those
    previously analyzed by the government.

    Navarro, who has been dealing with the select committee without
    a lawyer, publicly acknowledged receiving a grand jury subpoena
    related to his refusal to comply last week. He filed a lawsuit
    against the committee and Justice Department Tuesday, but a
    federal judge told him Thursday to refile it to correct a series
    of errors.

    The select committee subpoenaed Navarro to testify in February,
    but he told them he would refuse to comply, citing executive
    privilege. The panel countered that its questions for him did
    not broach any possible privileges related to his White House
    work. Still, Navarro refused to appear. The committee held him
    in contempt for that decision in April, asking the Justice
    Department to pursue charges. The full House followed suit,
    adopting the panel’s recommendation.

    On the same day the committee held Navarro in contempt, members
    expressed frustration that the Justice Department had not acted
    on its contempt referral of former White House chief of staff
    Mark Meadows. The House referred Meadows for contempt charges in
    December, but DOJ has not acted on the referral.

    The case will be overseen by Judge Amit Mehta, who is also
    presiding over two other crucial Jan. 6 cases: the seditious
    conspiracy trial against leaders of the Oath Keepers and a
    sprawling series of civil lawsuits against Trump filed by
    members of Congress and Capitol Police officers. Assistant U.S.
    Attorneys Elizabeth Aloi and Molly Gaston are handling the case
    for DOJ. Amanda Vaughn, the lead prosecutor in the Bannon case,
    is also listed among the prosecutors.

    Nancy Pelosi can still go fuck herself.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/03/navarro-indicted-for- contempt-of-congress-after-defying-jan-6-committee-subpoena-
    00037069

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)