• In A HUMILIATING DEFEAT Supreme Court Again Sides With Biden On Ghost G

    From More Guns = More Dead Children@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 18 00:49:08 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: rec.arts.tv, alt.atheism

    Bloodthirsty rightist Federal Judge who loves seeing
    American children die suffers another defeat.

    Wonder if he's accepting 'gifts' from the gun lobby too?

    https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/10/justices-again-side- with-biden-on-ghost-guns/

    Justices again side with Biden on ghost guns
    By Amy Howe
    on Oct 16, 2023 at 6:00 pm

    Less than three months after allowing the Biden
    administration to temporarily reinstate a rule by the
    Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
    regulating “ghost guns,” the Supreme Court blocked a ruling
    by a federal judge in Texas that would have prevented the
    government from enforcing the rule against two
    manufacturers of gun parts. Appealing to the justices to
    act, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar had urged
    the court not to “tolerate such circumvention of its
    orders.”

    Ghost guns are firearms without serial numbers that
    virtually anyone can assemble from parts, often purchased
    in a kit. In 2022, the ATF issued a rule to make clear that
    federal laws governing the sale of firearms – requiring,
    for example, background checks for purchases and imposing
    recordkeeping obligations – apply to ghost guns.

    On June 30, U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor barred ATF
    from enforcing the rule anywhere in the United States. The
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit narrowed the
    scope of O’Connor’s order but declined to put it on hold
    while the government appealed. That prompted Prelogar to
    come to the Supreme Court in July, telling the justices
    that O’Connor’s order was “irreparably harming the public
    and the government by reopening the floodgates to the tide
    of untraceable ghost guns flowing into our Nation’s
    communities.”

    By a vote of 5-4, the Supreme Court on Aug. 8 granted the
    government’s request to be able to enforce the rule while
    litigation continued in the lower courts. Justices Clarence
    Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh
    indicated that they would have allowed the ban on
    enforcement of the rule to continue.

    Shortly after the Supreme Court’s Aug. 8 order, two of the
    original challengers – Blackhawk Manufacturing and Defense
    Distributed – returned to the district court, seeking an
    injunction that would bar the government from enforcing the
    rule against them while the appeal continued. O’Connor
    granted that request on Sept. 14, and the 5th Circuit
    upheld O’Connor’s order on Oct. 2.

    The Biden administration returned to the Supreme Court
    three days later, asking the justices to intervene again.
    The Supreme Court’s Aug. 8 order, Prelogar wrote, “reflects
    an authoritative determination that the government should
    be allowed to implement the Rule during appellate
    proceedings.” If the Supreme Court does not block
    O’Connor’s order, Prelogar warned, “untraceable ghost guns
    will remain widely available to anyone with a computer and
    a credit card – no background check required.” And more
    broadly, she added, the court should step in because the
    lower courts “have effectively countermanded this Court’s
    authoritative determination” that the Biden administration
    should be able to enforce the rule nationwide while its
    appeal continues.

    Defense Distributed countered that O’Connor’s Sept. 14
    order provided a different remedy than his June 30 order:
    While the earlier order vacated the rule, so that it
    effectively did not exist anywhere in the country,
    O’Connor’s Sept. 14 order simply barred the government from
    enforcing the rule against Blackhawk and Defense
    Distributed.

    In light of this difference, Blackhawk emphasized, the
    company had no choice but to go back to the district court
    to seek relief “to preserve its ability to stay in
    business” until the litigation is concluded.

    On Oct. 6, Justice Samuel Alito, who handles emergency
    appeals from the 5th Circuit, issued a temporary stay of
    O’Connor’s ruling, until 5 p.m. on Oct. 16, to give the
    Supreme Court time to consider the Biden administration’s
    request. In a brief, unsigned order issued shortly before
    4:30 p.m. on Monday, the justices vacated O’Connor’s order,
    clearing the way for the Biden administration to enforce
    the rule against Blackhawk and Defense Distributed for now.
    There were no public dissents from the court’s order.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)