• "Taxpocalypse" Now - Preventing tax hikes and cutting spending should b

    From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 6 17:05:00 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: us.taxes

    “First, do no harm” is as good an approach for legislators as it is for physicians. Therefore next year’s Republican Congress should make sure to prevent tax hikes that are now scheduled for the end of 2025. Many provisions of the Trump tax reform of 2017 are due to expire then, and it would do a
    world of economic good to remove uncertainty and assure individuals and businesses that they will not be facing higher tax burdens. Unfortunately
    this issue already seems to be sliding down the Beltway priority list.

    The Journal’s Richard Rubin notes:

    Senate Republicans are considering quick legislation early next year
    to strengthen border security, energy production and the military while
    saving a tax-policy fight for later in 2025, laying out a two-step
    process for passing President-elect Donald Trump’s agenda without any
    Democratic help.

    Sen. John Thune (R., S.D.), the incoming majority leader, outlined the
    approach to GOP lawmakers Tuesday as the party prepares to take control
    of the House, Senate and White House in January. Lawmakers would aim to
    move a targeted bill within 30 days after Trump takes office Jan. 20
    and then spend more time working on taxes and other issues, according
    to a person familiar with Thune’s remarks in a closed-door meeting.

    This approach, which contrasts with the plans of many House Republicans, is questionable for a number of reasons. On issues like border enforcement and enabling energy production, there is a great deal the president can do administratively while Congress deliberates. Not so with tax reform.
    Meaningful action requires changes in law.

    Such action is definitely needed. “A Taxpocalypse of Rising Rates Is Coming
    For Americans,” says the headline on a piece by Eric Boehm, who writes for Reason:

    When the new session of Congress opens on January 3, the clock will
    already be ticking toward the most important set of fiscal decisions
    lawmakers will make this decade.

    Decisions made through the end of 2025 will determine the fate of
    literally trillions of Americans’ dollars. Will they remain in wallets,
    bank accounts, and retirement portfolios, or will they flow to the U.S.
    Treasury to fund wars and welfare?

    This “fiscal cliff” is eight years in the making. The 2017 Tax Cuts
    and Jobs Act (TCJA) revamped both the federal corporate and individual
    income tax codes. But while the new, lower, corporate income tax rate
    (and associated changes) were made permanent, many changes to the
    individual tax code were temporary. That includes the higher standard
    deduction… and the lower tax rates… Under the TCJA, the top marginal
    rate was reduced from 39.6 percent to 37 percent—with rates for other
    tax brackets falling similarly.

    As legislators act to prevent harm to taxpayers, they can also pursue a wellness program to ensure taxpayer health in the future. This means restraining spending.

    Speaking of the libertarians at Reason and ideas for spending cuts, editor Katherine Mangu-Ward playfully goes a little overboard in publishing an “Abolish Everything” issue of the magazine. Still, she provides some welcome food for thought in writing:

    “Pick at random any three letters from the alphabet, put them in any
    order, and you will have an acronym designating a federal agency we can
    do without.” This quip was true when Milton Friedman said it many
    decades ago, and it’s gotten only more true over the many years that
    George Will has been quoting it in his columns and speeches.

    The Constitution laid out a clear vision for the role of the federal
    government, one limited in both scope and power. Yet the government
    has drifted far from this blueprint. Departments and agencies now exist
    that would be unrecognizable to the Founders. Despite trillions in
    taxpayer dollars and decades—or even centuries—of meddling, these
    agencies have hampered economic growth, violated human rights, and
    eroded civil liberties...

    We aren’t making the case for anarchism (at least at the moment),
    merely hoping to highlight that the federal government was never
    supposed to be all things to all people. It’s time to take a hard look
    at which agencies have earned their place and which are long past their
    expiration date.

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruise@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Mon Dec 9 09:54:42 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: us.taxes

    Ubiquitous wrote:
    “First, do no harm” is as good an approach for legislators as it is for physicians. Therefore next year’s Republican Congress should make sure to prevent tax hikes that are now scheduled for the end of 2025. Many provisions of the Trump tax reform of 2017 are due to expire then, and it would do a world of economic good to remove uncertainty and assure individuals and businesses that they will not be facing higher tax burdens. Unfortunately this issue already seems to be sliding down the Beltway priority list.

    Tax the rich or let them toget richer. Which is better for the people?

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Siri Cruise on Mon Dec 9 14:25:57 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: us.taxes

    Siri Cruise wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    Ubiquitous wrote:

    “First, do no harm” is as good an approach for legislators as it is for >> physicians. Therefore next year’s Republican Congress should make sure to >> prevent tax hikes that are now scheduled for the end of 2025. Many provisions
    of the Trump tax reform of 2017 are due to expire then, and it would do a
    world of economic good to remove uncertainty and assure individuals and
    businesses that they will not be facing higher tax burdens. Unfortunately
    this issue already seems to be sliding down the Beltway priority list.

    Tax the rich or let them toget richer. Which is better for the people?

    Remember when the corporate tax rate was high and we were able to fund infrastructure etc.? Then came Reagan.

    Now it's take from the poor and give to the rich.

    --
    The universe is ruled by letting things take their course. It cannot be
    ruled by interfering.
    -- Chinese proverb

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pothead@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Mon Dec 9 19:32:48 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: us.taxes

    On 2024-12-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    Siri Cruise wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    Ubiquitous wrote:

    “First, do no harm” is as good an approach for legislators as it is for >>> physicians. Therefore next year’s Republican Congress should make sure to >>> prevent tax hikes that are now scheduled for the end of 2025. Many provisions
    of the Trump tax reform of 2017 are due to expire then, and it would do a >>> world of economic good to remove uncertainty and assure individuals and
    businesses that they will not be facing higher tax burdens. Unfortunately >>> this issue already seems to be sliding down the Beltway priority list.

    Tax the rich or let them toget richer. Which is better for the people?

    Remember when the corporate tax rate was high and we were able to fund infrastructure etc.? Then came Reagan.

    Now it's take from the poor and give to the rich.

    We have had that the last 4 years due to Biden.
    Do you think the rich care that food prices have skyrocketed 20-30% under Biden?
    The poor certainly do.


    --
    pothead

    All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html>
    <https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html>
    <https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 9 15:39:46 2024
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: us.taxes

    In article <vj7gl0$htqv$2@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com says...

    On 2024-12-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    Siri Cruise wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    Ubiquitous wrote:

    ?First, do no harm? is as good an approach for legislators as it is for >>> physicians. Therefore next year?s Republican Congress should make sure to >>> prevent tax hikes that are now scheduled for the end of 2025. Many provisions
    of the Trump tax reform of 2017 are due to expire then, and it would do a >>> world of economic good to remove uncertainty and assure individuals and >>> businesses that they will not be facing higher tax burdens. Unfortunately >>> this issue already seems to be sliding down the Beltway priority list.

    Tax the rich or let them toget richer. Which is better for the people?

    Remember when the corporate tax rate was high and we were able to fund infrastructure etc.? Then came Reagan.

    Now it's take from the poor and give to the rich.

    We have had that the last 4 years due to Biden.
    Do you think the rich care that food prices have skyrocketed 20-30% under Biden?
    The poor certainly do.

    I don't recall them taking anything from me except taxes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to Siri Cruise on Mon Dec 9 23:35:23 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa, us.taxes

    On 2024-12-09 17:54:42 +0000, Siri Cruise said:

    Ubiquitous wrote:
    “First, do no harm” is as good an approach for legislators as it is for >> physicians. Therefore next year’s Republican Congress should make sure to >> prevent tax hikes that are now scheduled for the end of 2025. Many provisions
    of the Trump tax reform of 2017 are due to expire then, and it would do a
    world of economic good to remove uncertainty and assure individuals and
    businesses that they will not be facing higher tax burdens. Unfortunately
    this issue already seems to be sliding down the Beltway priority list.

    Tax the rich or let them toget richer. Which is better for the people?

    Ask not for whom the Republican-induced national bankruptcy bell tolls,
    it tolls for thee.

    At some point Trump and his billionaire/millionaire buddies may have to
    build moats around their castles though (look what happened with the
    French Revolution).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)