Contents :
Le 01/10/2023 à 08:47, "faq" aka "La Libre Parole" a écrit :
Contents :
LLP is a troll and no one should believe what is said in this pseudo FAQ which he debated with no one but himself.
For example, the news.usenet.ovh server refuses cancels from miakibot
because of past abuse.
I can produce the list of more than 4000 past abusive cancels of the
miakibot on judicial requisition.
Le 01/11/2023 à 19:26, llp a écrit :
I can produce the list of more than 4000 past abusive cancels of the
miakibot on judicial requisition.
I can produce a list of your rogue cancels of my messages on fr.usenet.abus.d, did you tell that to everyone ?
In fact you are not only a troll, you are a malicious person :-(
Le 01/11/2023 à 18:53, "faq" a écrit :
For example, the news.usenet.ovh server refuses cancels from miakibot
because of past abuse.
This is false,
1 - Preamblesnip
2 - Definition of NoCeM
3 - NoCeM or Cancel?
4 - Nocem issuers
5 - Descriptions and tips on existing nocems
6 - Conclusion
7 - References
- spam : drugs/meds/cards/casino from GoogleGroups
...
- thai : NoCeM notice for Thai flood originating from Google Groups.
Le 01/03/2024 à 23:46, "faq" a écrit :
Here, the sample used to train the robot to detect spam seems
to be poorly done: too much false positives for spam.
Other types of nocem generate inappropriate false positives.
In particular spam3 and 4, which on some forums, such as fr.soc.politique, >> could be seen as censorship.
Personnal attacks again in a so called "DOC".
1 - Preamble
2 - Definition of NoCeM
3 - NoCeM or Cancel?
4 - Nocem issuers
5 - Descriptions and tips on existing nocems
6 - Conclusion
7 - References
1 - Preamble
This document, posted monthly, list the nocems currently published
on the "news.lists.filters" group.
It does not deal with nocems published in a local hierarchy.
The aim is to publicize existing general nocems so that server
administrators can decide which nocems they wish to apply or not.
2 - Definition
NoCeM (pronounced No See 'Em) is a modern solution for managing spam.
Rather than issuing a "cancel" on a spam message that most servers will >reject, we generate a message in the "news.lists.filters" group called >"nocem", which contain the message(s) to be deleted.
Each nocem is signed with a gpg key to guarantee its authenticity.
The manager of each server is free to apply these nocems or not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
3 - NoCeM or Cancel?
- Using nocems requires the server administrator to modify its configuration
to accept them. Otherwise, the nocem does nothing on the server.
It's a simple text message.
- Cancel, on the other hand, is accepted by default by the server
configuration. It's up to the server administrator to modify his config
to refuse certain types of cancels. This is not always easy for servers
with little administration or little knowledge of "fr" specificities.
Reminder: general NoCeMs are published in news.lists.filters.
4 - Nocem issuers
- " bleachbot " <bleachbot@httrack.com>
- " nocembot " <nocem@usenet.ovh>
- <nocem@eternal-september.org>
- " nono le petit robot " <robot@pasdenom.info>
- " i2pn2-nocem " <i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org>
- "news.chmurka.net nocembot" <nocem@chmurka.net>
5 - Descriptions et conseils sur les nocems existants
5.1 - " bleachbot "
Information : http://home.httrack.net/~nocem/
Public key : http://home.httrack.net/~nocem/bleachbot.asc
Types of nocems :
- spam : detection based on previously confirmed spam with BI>=20.
- site : flood and hipcrime detection.
Tip: Nocem has been a recognized source for years.
Recommended for use on all servers.
This robot seems to have stopped since January 1, 2024
5.2 - " nocembot "
Information : http://usenet.ovh/?article=nocem
Public key : http://usenet.ovh/files/alfanet_0x5789E33A_public
Types of nocems :
- spam : spams and clearly malicious articles
- flood : well-known regular flooders
Tip: New public Nocems source since June 5, 2023
(previously restricted to the news.usenet.ovh server).
The website details what is filtered.
Recommended for use on all servers.
5.3 - nocem@eternal-september.org
Information : https://www.eternal-september.org/index.php?showpage=nocem >Public key : : https://www.eternal-september.org/nocem-eternal-september.asc >Les types de nocems :
- spam : drugs/meds/cards/casino from GoogleGroups
- bot : bot generated pseudo discussions from various sources
(currently from Abavia).
Tip : New public Nocems source since septembre 25, 2023
Recommended use of on all servers.
5.4 - " nono le petit robot "
Information : https://pasdenom.info/nocem.html
Public key : http://pasdenom.info/gpg/robot.pasdenom.asc
Types of nocems :
- spam : spams 99,99%
- spam2 : spams with rare false positives
- spam3 : spam with false positives
- spam4 : spams with slightly more false positives
- site : rare manual notices
Tip: these nocems are the result of the use of "spamassasin".
An effective product usually used to detect spam in emails.
Here, the sample used to train the robot to detect spam seems
to be poorly done: too much false positives for spam.
Other types of nocem generate inappropriate false positives.
In particular spam3 and 4, which on some forums, such as fr.soc.politique, >could be seen as censorship.
The "site" nocem is used for abuse that is generally consensual.
5.5 - " i2pn2-nocem " <i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org>
Information : ?
Public key : https://www.novabbs.com/hierarchy/i2pn2-nocem.txt
Types of nocems :
- spam : These bot-spam NoCeM notices may cover any hierarchy and
are automatically generated by a spamassassin script.
Tip : Recommended use of on all servers.
5.6 - "news.chmurka.net nocembot" <nocem@chmurka.net>
Information : http://news.chmurka.net/nocem.php
Public key : http://news.chmurka.net/nocem-chmurka.asc
Types of nocems :
- thai : NoCeM notice for Thai flood originating from Google Groups.
Tip : Recommended use of on all servers.
6 - Conclusion
If you want to contribute to this document, you can reply directly
to this message (or by e-mail if you prefer).
7 - References:
- The NoCeM FAQ. V0.93: http://www.cm.org/faq.html
- Kleopatra: https://www.openpgp.org/software/kleopatra/
(certificate manager and GUI for GnuP)
- Global cancels: <news:m25ylayonf.fsf@raybanana.net>
Contents :
1 - Preamble
2 - Definition of NoCeM
3 - NoCeM or Cancel?
4 - Nocem issuers
5 - Descriptions and tips on existing nocems
6 - Conclusion
7 - References
. . .
The manager of each server is free to apply these nocems or not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
. . .
3 - NoCeM or Cancel?
- Using nocems requires the server administrator to modify its configuration >to accept them. Otherwise, the nocem does nothing on the server.
It's a simple text message.
- Cancel, on the other hand, is accepted by default by the server >configuration. It's up to the server administrator to modify his config
to refuse certain types of cancels. This is not always easy for servers
with little administration or little knowledge of "fr" specificities.
faq <faq@usenet.ovh> wrote:
Contents :
1 - Preamble
2 - Definition of NoCeM
3 - NoCeM or Cancel?
4 - Nocem issuers
5 - Descriptions and tips on existing nocems
6 - Conclusion
7 - References
. . .
The manager of each server is free to apply these nocems or not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
Oh, c'mon. Don't put statements in a document meant to be taken
seriously expressing the personal opinion of a certain party that is
unique among all of Usenet server administration.
That those two French News servers weren't configured to reject all
cancel messages was a decision made by their News administrators.
Accepting or rejecting control messages is a matter of how a News
server is configured, never an "imposition". News administrators run
Usenet, not parties issuing control messages.
Please use the term "News administrator", noting the capitalization.
They aren't managers.
The News administrators of each server is free to apply these nocems or
not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 18:18:00 +0000, faq wrote:
The News administrators of each server is free to apply these nocems or
not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
huh? global (or for that matter any) cancels (just like nocems) are not imposed here...
On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 18:18:00 +0000, faq wrote:
The News administrators of each server is free to apply these nocems or
not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
huh? global (or for that matter any) cancels (just like nocems) are not imposed here...
So abusers can make abusives cancels, like Olivier Miakinen on "fr"
You can't write a faq, because to do that you need to be objective.
You are a far right stalker, nothing else.
Le 03/07/2024 23:14, Eric M replied to an anonymous user :
(french hater troll speaking)
And of course, since he issues NoCeMs while I issue Cancels, he's trying to make it look like Cancels are much worse than NoCeMs.
noel a formulé ce mercredi :
On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 18:18:00 +0000, faq wrote:
The News administrators of each server is free to apply these nocems
or not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
huh? global (or for that matter any) cancels (just like nocems) are
not imposed here...
If you use an inn2 version prior to 2.7, cancel are accepted by default.
So abusers can make abusives cancels, like Olivier Miakinen on "fr"
So abusers can make abusives cancels
Bonjour,
Dans le message <v64but$abkr$1@news.usenet.ovh>, llp a écrit le mercredi
3 juillet 2024 Ã 22 h 22Â :
So abusers can make abusives cancels
What's the point of reproducing here a discussion that you've relaunched endlessly on fr.usenet.abus.d?
On Wed, 03 Jul 2024 22:22:48 +0200, llp wrote:
noel a formulé ce mercredi :
On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 18:18:00 +0000, faq wrote:
The News administrators of each server is free to apply these nocems
or not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
huh? global (or for that matter any) cancels (just like nocems) are
not imposed here...
If you use an inn2 version prior to 2.7, cancel are accepted by default.
So abusers can make abusives cancels, like Olivier Miakinen on "fr"
That's a failing of INN then if that is true, or is that a distro package
and not source pkg you use? We known distro pkg maintainers like to think they know better despite in reality knowing S.F.A.
I've used dnews since early beta days (early/mid) 90's and it has never accepted cancels by default, so I'd be astonished if INN through all
those decades, did.
The News administrators of each server is free to apply these nocems or
not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
Cancel, on the other hand, is accepted by default by the server
configuration. It's up to the server administrator to modify his
config to refuse certain types of cancels.
On Wed, 01 Jan 2025 11:21:42 +0000, faq wrote:
The News administrators of each server is free to apply these nocems or
not,
unlike global cancels, nothing is imposed.
You still spreading this mis-information?
global cancels? no such thing, because *like* nocems, each administrator
is free to honor them, or ignore them, just like nocems.
Contents :
    1 - Preamble
    2 - Definition of NoCeM
    3 - NoCeM or Cancel?
    4 - Nocem issuers
    5 - Descriptions and tips on existing nocems
    6 - Conclusion
    7 - References
Le 1/05/25 à 00:45, faq a écrit :
Contents :
    1 - Preamble
    2 - Definition of NoCeM
    3 - NoCeM or Cancel?
    4 - Nocem issuers
    5 - Descriptions and tips on existing nocems
    6 - Conclusion
    7 - References
Pour les ceusses qui ne savent pas se servir d'un killfile.
"Laika (Fe Dhc Ph.D)" <laika@not-for-mail.invalid> composa la prose suivante:
Le 1/05/25 à 00:45, faq a écrit :
Contents :
    1 - Preamble
    2 - Definition of NoCeM
    3 - NoCeM or Cancel?
    4 - Nocem issuers
    5 - Descriptions and tips on existing nocems
    6 - Conclusion
    7 - References
Pour les ceusses qui ne savent pas se servir d'un killfile.
Pas uniquement.
Lors de la grande vague de spam venant de Google le killfile
n'était pas vraiment utilisable. Je rappelle qu'il y a eu jusqu'a
100000 spams par jour. Quelques gestionnaires ont lutté en les
supprimant à l'arrivé sur leur serveur et en émettant des nocems
pour les autres serveurs qui voulaient les utiliser.
Not only that.
During the great wave of spam coming from Google, the killfile
was not really usable. I remind you that there was up to
100,000 spam messages a day. Some newsmasters fought back by
deleting deleting them as they arrived on their server and issuing
nocems for other servers that wanted to use them.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 00:25:13 |
Calls: | 10,387 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,061 |
Messages: | 6,416,719 |