Hey, everyone. I'm seeing i2pn2 NoCeMs cancelling ovh NoCeMs. Any idea
what's happening?
Do you remember where he wrote about it, so I can go and take a look?
IIRC there is a cancelling war between some NNTP operators, maybe ask
"Ray Banana" from eternal september, IIRC he wrote about this.
Am 21.11.2023 um 09:22:17 Uhr schrieb Tom Furie:
Hey, everyone. I'm seeing i2pn2 NoCeMs cancelling ovh NoCeMs. Any ideaIIRC there is a cancelling war between some NNTP operators, maybe ask
what's happening?
"Ray Banana" from eternal september, IIRC he wrote about this.
Hey, everyone. I'm seeing i2pn2 NoCeMs cancelling ovh NoCeMs. Any idea
what's happening?
Ray Banana wrote:
Thus spake Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de>
Am 21.11.2023 um 09:22:17 Uhr schrieb Tom Furie:
Hey, everyone. I'm seeing i2pn2 NoCeMs cancelling ovh NoCeMs. Any idea >>>> what's happening?IIRC there is a cancelling war between some NNTP operators, maybe ask
"Ray Banana" from eternal september, IIRC he wrote about this.
I was referring to a quarrel between pasdenom and usenet.ovh, primarily
in the fr.* hierarchy.
If i2pn2 is sending nocems for nocem messages issued by ovh, this is
most likely a malfunction in i2pn2's spam filter. IIRC ovh includes
the subject header of spam articles in its nocem messages, which in turn
triggers i2pn2's spam filter.
Maybe Retro Guy could comment on this?
There is no war.
Ray is correct, my (i2pn2) filters must be triggering on
the nocem messages. I'll check into that right away! Thanks for letting me know about it!
Thus spake Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de>
Am 21.11.2023 um 09:22:17 Uhr schrieb Tom Furie:
Hey, everyone. I'm seeing i2pn2 NoCeMs cancelling ovh NoCeMs. Any ideaIIRC there is a cancelling war between some NNTP operators, maybe ask
what's happening?
"Ray Banana" from eternal september, IIRC he wrote about this.
I was referring to a quarrel between pasdenom and usenet.ovh, primarily
in the fr.* hierarchy.
If i2pn2 is sending nocems for nocem messages issued by ovh, this is
most likely a malfunction in i2pn2's spam filter. IIRC ovh includes
the subject header of spam articles in its nocem messages, which in turn triggers i2pn2's spam filter.
Maybe Retro Guy could comment on this?
Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> writes:
IIRC there is a cancelling war between some NNTP operators, maybe ask
"Ray Banana" from eternal september, IIRC he wrote about this.
That seems a bizarre concept to me. What do they have to war about, so
long as the spam gets shut down?
Tom Furie <tom@furie.org.uk> wrote:
I don't know about Usenet spam, but I thought ovh was a major source of
email spam what with wikitimbres and voilesnews and so forth. Are they
doing legit spam cancels on usenet?
Don't confuse usenet.ovh with the ISP and Hoster OVH. Tey're a private
Usenet server hosted at OVH just using their TLD. And they issue valuable NoCeMs
on Usenet.
you're like a cancer
Le 21/11/2023 19:26, Ray Banana a crit :
Don't confuse usenet.ovh with the ISP and Hoster OVH. Tey're a private
Usenet server hosted at OVH just using their TLD. And they issue valuable
NoCeMs
on Usenet.
And their newsmaster made rogue cancel and pushed Marc Shaefer to stop Alphanet.
Le 21/11/2023 à 22:37, llp a écrit :
you're like a cancerDoes someone reliable to manage NoCems speaks like that ? I'm not sure.
Thus spake kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Tom Furie <tom@furie.org.uk> wrote:
I don't know about Usenet spam, but I thought ovh was a major source of
email spam what with wikitimbres and voilesnews and so forth. Are they
doing legit spam cancels on usenet?
Don't confuse usenet.ovh with the ISP and Hoster OVH. Tey're a private
Usenet server hosted at OVH just using their TLD. And they issue valuable NoCeMs
on Usenet.
I was referring to a quarrel between pasdenom and usenet.ovh, primarily
in the fr.* hierarchy.
Hi,
Ray Banana a tapoté le 21/11/2023 11:49:
I was referring to a quarrel between pasdenom and usenet.ovh, primarily
in the fr.* hierarchy.
Quoting spam in nocem notice made them marked by spamassassin ...
I was referring to a quarrel between pasdenom and usenet.ovh, primarily
in the fr.* hierarchy.
Ray Banana a écrit :
I was referring to a quarrel between pasdenom and usenet.ovh, primarilyI dont understand which quarrel you are speaking?
in the fr.* hierarchy.
Posts whith Path ending with !devjntp are posted by a non-NNTP server (nemoweb.net) that I cannot control, I'm just the last NNTP feed...
A quick glance at f.u.a.d. should suffice to see what I'm talking about.
And Eric is just the moderator of the nemoweb frontend and can not
control the operation of the backend server (i.e. pasdenom), I know.
Anyway, this discussion is not helpful in the struggle to stop the spam
flood from Google Groups and should remain in f.u.a.d, where
people seem to be more willing to dedicate their time to such bickering.
Le 23/11/2023 12:22, Ray Banana a crit :
A quick glance at f.u.a.d. should suffice to see what I'm talking about.
And Eric is just the moderator of the nemoweb frontend and can not
control the operation of the backend server (i.e. pasdenom), I know.
I'm not a real moderator, I can't control many things.
Anyway, this discussion is not helpful in the struggle to stop the spam
flood from Google Groups and should remain in f.u.a.d, where
people seem to be more willing to dedicate their time to such bickering.
Well, I would agree with you in the meantime but I don't like far right activists like LLP
so it annoys me a bit when people call them "reliable",
but I don't want to start a flame war here so I won't go further,
mail me if you want to speak, my adress is valid as is :)
Hi,
Ray Banana a crit :
I was referring to a quarrel between pasdenom and usenet.ovh, primarily
in the fr.* hierarchy.
Posts whith Path ending with !devjntp are posted by a non-NNTP server (nemoweb.net) that I cannot control, I'm just the last NNTP feed...
Perhaps you could ask him to set a valid abuse address for his server ?
I asked him many times...
Perhaps you could ask him to set a valid abuse address for his server ?
Perhaps you could ask him to set a valid abuse address for his server ?
I asked him many times...
llp a crit :
Perhaps you could ask him to set a valid abuse address for his server ?
I asked him many times...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 00:33:37 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,720 |