Hi all,
Following a discussion with Adam, I think it's better to open a new thread.
Lots of valuable archaeology information have been sent in this
newsgroup for years but unfortunately they weren't gathered for quick
reference somewhere.
There are also old notes from Russ and tale here:
https://ftp.isc.org/usenet/CONFIG/HIERARCHY-NOTES
I'm wondering the best way to revive them, and integrate Adam's and
other people's valuable information about hierarchies.
I could easily parse HIERARCHY-NOTES and make the related information
available in the web pages of a hierarchy in usenet.trigofacile.com, as
a new item "History notes" for instance, just after the "Comments" from
control.ctl. The problem however is that all the hierarchies listed in
HIERARCHY-NOTES are not referenced in ftp.isc.org files. Should I then
just add them in "Defunct hierarchies" with the "History notes" item?
Another possibility would be to add a "Hierarchy notes" web page with
the contents of HIERARCHY-NOTES (plus maybe also the Comments from
control.ctl to make the notes more complete).
Or implement both :)
They indeed both seem useful, with different use cases (looking at one
hierarchy or looking at the history of all of them).
I could then integrate in the notes every details Adam or others found
out these late years. (Unless they are more appropriate in control.ctl,
when speaking about rules for the processing of control articles.)
Any other thoughts welcome about how to best achieve that and revive the
hierarchy notes.
I have nothing of substance to offer, other than to say that as a
long time Usenet consumer (and occasional contributor) I truly
appreciate the efforts to maintain/improve the system.
Incidentally, I have a question about a sentence from the initial file:
"it would be good to extract the information in here about private and defunct hierarchies and combine it with the hierarchies FAQ". Which FAQ
is it? I don't think it is the Hierarchy Administration FAQ. Is this
FAQ still posted somewhere in a newsgroup, or available at a URL?
Another question: I do not understand the wording "According to Alan
somebody in mail to me". Has anyone a clue of the intended meaning?
Would it be "According to Alan, somebody who emailed me"?
manawatu.*
For the Manawatu district of New Zealand. Contact
news@manawatu.gen.nz for more information. According to Alan somebody
in mail to me on 5 Feb 1993, "... it's unlikely that you'll ever see
any traffic on it"
Lots of valuable archaeology information have been sent in this
newsgroup for years but unfortunately they weren't gathered for quick reference somewhere.
There are also old notes from Russ and tale here:
 https://ftp.isc.org/usenet/CONFIG/HIERARCHY-NOTES
Good news, I have finally taken the time to integrate that great work
from Russ and tale here:
http://usenet.trigofacile.com/hierarchies/notes-about-hierarchies.html
Naturally, if anyone has suggestions of additions now or anytime in the future, just drop a note here and I'll happily update the notes.
Would it make sense to add the information from the - defunct - Master
List of Newsgroup Hierarchies? An archived version is available at <https://web.archive.org/web/20160407174854/http://pfx.ca/mlnh/mlnhtables.html>.
(That would allow me to cross that item off my ever-growing todo list. :))
Would it make sense to add the information from the - defunct - Master
List of Newsgroup Hierarchies? An archived version is available at
<https://web.archive.org/web/20160407174854/http://pfx.ca/mlnh/mlnhtables.html>.
I propose to merge that Master List into the descriptions of hierarchies currently extracted only from control.ctl:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Julien-Elie/usenet-hierarchies/main/nas/data/hierarchies/Description
Another question: I do not understand the wording "According to Alan
somebody in mail to me". Has anyone a clue of the intended meaning?
Would it be "According to Alan, somebody who emailed me"?
manawatu.*
For the Manawatu district of New Zealand. Contact
news@manawatu.gen.nz for more information. According to Alan somebody
in mail to me on 5 Feb 1993, "... it's unlikely that you'll ever see
any traffic on it"
I don't know for sure, but knowing the way that tale phrased things, my
guess is that means someone mailed him who used only "Alan" with no last
name in their From header.
manawatu.*
For the Manawatu district of New Zealand. Contact
news@manawatu.gen.nz for more information. According to Alan somebody
in mail to me on 5 Feb 1993, "... it's unlikely that you'll ever see
any traffic on it"
This would have been Alan Brown who was involved in Manawatu Internet Services
manawatu.gen.nz was their UUCP hub address.
Would it make sense to add the information from the - defunct - Master
List of Newsgroup Hierarchies? An archived version is available at <https://web.archive.org/web/20160407174854/http://pfx.ca/mlnh/mlnhtables.html>.
(That would allow me to cross that item off my ever-growing todo list. :))
Question, in case someone knows: abg.* and affrc.* are listed in the
master list, but without any information. Does it remind you anything?
I've kept "?" for them but will update it as needed if someone has >information.
Julien ÉLIE in news.admin.hierarchies:
Question, in case someone knows: abg.* and affrc.* are listed in the
master list, but without any information. Does it remind you anything? >>I've kept "?" for them but will update it as needed if someone has >>information.
AFAIK, abg.* is the regional hierarchy (city hierarchy) for
Augsburg, DE. But I'm not fully sure about that.
Question, in case someone knows: abg.* and affrc.* are listed in the
master list, but without any information. Does it remind you anything?
I've kept "?" for them but will update it as needed if someone has >information.
AFAIK, abg.* is the regional hierarchy (city hierarchy) for
Augsburg, DE. But I'm not fully sure about that.
Can confirm.
AFAIK, abg.* is the regional hierarchy (city hierarchy) for
Augsburg, DE. But I'm not fully sure about that.
Marcel Logen wrote:
AFAIK, abg.* is the regional hierarchy (city hierarchy) for
Augsburg, DE. But I'm not fully sure about that.
Yes, that's correct. See <https://de-regio.de/show.php?hierarchy=abg>.
BTW a correction:
| Beschreibung Ausgburg,Germany
^^ ^^
Doing a Google search, the only match I could find for affrc was for the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council in Japan.
See <https://de-regio.de/show.php?hierarchy=abg>.
I did not know that web site. Very great work, and useful for an
overview of German-speaking hierarchies.
https://de-regio.de/show.php?hierarchy=bln&lang=en
You may want to update the date of the latest checkgroups for bln.* and
add information about its new PGP-managed status.
## BDA (German groups?)
checkgroups:news@*netuse.de:bda.*:doit
newgroup:news@*netuse.de:bda.*:doit
rmgroup:news@*netuse.de:bda.*:doit
This hierarchy is not listed in your web site. Does it sound something
to you?
Would it make sense to add the information from the - defunct - Master
List of Newsgroup Hierarchies? An archived version is available at
<https://web.archive.org/web/20160407174854/http://pfx.ca/mlnh/mlnhtables.html>.
(That would allow me to cross that item off my ever-growing todo list. :))
I've at last done that. We can both cross that item off :-)
I hope the result looks fine to you.
The merged view of control.ctl and the master list is here:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Julien-Elie/usenet-hierarchies/main/nas/data/hierarchies/Description
Julien ÉLIE wrote (on 2024-01-07):
## BDA (German groups?)
checkgroups:news@*netuse.de:bda.*:doit
newgroup:news@*netuse.de:bda.*:doit
rmgroup:news@*netuse.de:bda.*:doit
That's a new one. I'll look into that.
[...]## BDA (German groups?)
Fascinating.
"BDA" is an abbreviation for "Bundesdatenautobahn", which translates to "Federal Data Highway".
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 39:18:07 |
Calls: | 10,392 |
Files: | 14,064 |
Messages: | 6,417,185 |