Is this a current assessment of the 5 broken no registration nntp servers?
[nntp.aioe.org:119]
[news.dizum.net:119]
[freenews.netfront.net:119]
[news.neodome.net:119]
[news.mixmin.net:563]
aioe is still out of commission as an nntp server
dizum is no longer available for posting
netfront is no longer available for posting
neodome is no longer available for posting
mixmin is delaying some messages by days and not sending most others
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
Is this a current assessment of the 5 broken no registration nntp servers?
[nntp.aioe.org:119]
[news.dizum.net:119]
[freenews.netfront.net:119]
[news.neodome.net:119]
[news.mixmin.net:563]
aioe is still out of commission as an nntp server
dizum is no longer available for posting
netfront is no longer available for posting
neodome is no longer available for posting
mixmin is delaying some messages by days and not sending most others
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
Is this a current assessment of the 5 broken no registration nntp
servers?
[nntp.aioe.org:119]
[news.dizum.net:119]
[freenews.netfront.net:119]
[news.neodome.net:119]
[news.mixmin.net:563]
aioe is still out of commission as an nntp server
dizum is no longer available for posting
mixmin is delaying some messages by days and not sending most others
R.Wieser <address@not.available> wrote:
Is this a current assessment of the 5 broken no registration nntp
servers?
[nntp.aioe.org:119]
[news.dizum.net:119]
[freenews.netfront.net:119]
[news.neodome.net:119]
[news.mixmin.net:563]
aioe is still out of commission as an nntp server
dizum is no longer available for posting
netfront is no longer available for posting
neodome is no longer available for posting
mixmin is delaying some messages by days and not sending most others
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
In no particular order:
At least two of those servers became unavailable because
abusers caused their admins to close them for posting.
Another boasted it was a "problem provider"; it may still be,
everything posted there goes straight into my global killfile.
One was an altruistic hobby server that despite precautions
had many abusers. It suffered a catastrophic disk failure.
One is a more or less respectable server; I don't know why
it's having problems (is it still u/s?).
I expect that Paul will be along soon to tell us the inside story
as seen from the Pembroke perspective.
On 17 Feb 2023, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted some news:1q6agtu.9drbj01heul38N%snipeco.2@gmail.com:
R.Wieser <address@not.available> wrote:
Is this a current assessment of the 5 broken no registration nntp
servers?
[nntp.aioe.org:119]
[news.dizum.net:119]
[freenews.netfront.net:119]
[news.neodome.net:119]
[news.mixmin.net:563]
aioe is still out of commission as an nntp server
dizum is no longer available for posting
netfront is no longer available for posting
neodome is no longer available for posting
mixmin is delaying some messages by days and not sending most others
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
In no particular order:
At least two of those servers became unavailable because
abusers caused their admins to close them for posting.
Another boasted it was a "problem provider"; it may still be,
You mean you couldn't stalk anybody on it and it was a "problem provider"
for you because you got your ass kicked numerous times by posters using
it.
everything posted there goes straight into my global killfile.
One was an altruistic hobby server that despite precautions
had many abusers. It suffered a catastrophic disk failure.
Storage controller failure.
One is a more or less respectable server; I don't know why
it's having problems (is it still u/s?).
I expect that Paul will be along soon to tell us the inside story
as seen from the Pembroke perspective.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:45:49 +0100, R.Wieser observed the following stuff: that's certainly an odd coincidents , don't you think? i don't believe in coincidents , i wonder if pembroke paul does?
oo DAVID KEETING
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:45:49 +0100, R.Wieser observed the following stuff: that's certainly an odd coincidents , don't you think? i don't believe in coincidents , i wonder if pembroke paul does?
What's also odd is I tried to send this message and it doesn't show up.
At least not in the two newsgroups that I only sent it to alt.free.newsservers,news.software.nntp
Is it just those two newsgroups being blocked by Paganini & Mixmin?
Even now the original message that I had sent to the two newsgroup still doesn't show up but your replies show up. I don't know why.
I sent it with paganini and mixmin and both were delayed greatly.
Neither shows up but people's responses show up.
How did anyone get the original post if I don't see it having been posted?
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
RAID failure, recovery takes some time.
What's also odd is I tried to send this message and it doesn't show up.
At least not in the two newsgroups that I only sent it to alt.free.newsservers,news.software.nntp
5 broken no registration nntp servers?
Current assessment of the 5 broken no registration nntp servers?
Is this a current assessment of the 5 broken no registration nntp
servers?
I've seen multiple copies of your message in multiple newsgroups.
On 2/17/23 2:37 AM, Marco Moock wrote:
RAID failure, recovery takes some time.
We're well beyond the time needed to recover from a RAID failure.
Perhaps the RAID card itself died and a new one needed to be acquired
which needed funding.
Replacing a disk, even ordering it, is faster.
Restoring from backups on a new RAID is faster.
There's more than /just/ a RAID failure.
Maybe the RAID failure was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
On 2/17/23 2:37 AM, Marco Moock wrote:
RAID failure, recovery takes some time.
We're well beyond the time needed to recover from a RAID failure.
Perhaps the RAID card itself died and a new one needed to be
acquired which needed funding.
Replacing a disk, even ordering it, is faster.
Restoring from backups on a new RAID is faster.
There's more than /just/ a RAID failure.
Maybe the RAID failure was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Let's assume Paolo has a real life he had to get back to.
[...]> Also not really sure why any of this discussion is in news.software.nntp,that's certainly an odd coincidents , don't you think?
i don't believe in coincidents
since it doesn't seem to be a news software problem.
Maybe the RAID failure was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Maybe the RAID failure was the straw that broke the camel's back.
I heard that he had other problems (health?), but I dunno if that
is true.
R.Wieser <address@not.available> wrote:
Is this a current assessment of the 5 broken no registration nntp servers?
[nntp.aioe.org:119]
[news.dizum.net:119]
[freenews.netfront.net:119]
[news.neodome.net:119]
[news.mixmin.net:563]
aioe is still out of commission as an nntp server
dizum is no longer available for posting
netfront is no longer available for posting
neodome is no longer available for posting
mixmin is delaying some messages by days and not sending most others
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
In no particular order:
At least two of those servers became unavailable because
abusers caused their admins to close them for posting.
Another boasted it was a "problem provider"; it may still be,
everything posted there goes straight into my global killfile.
One was an altruistic hobby server that despite precautions
had many abusers. It suffered a catastrophic disk failure.
One is a more or less respectable server; I don't know why
it's having problems (is it still u/s?).
I expect that Paul will be along soon to tell us the inside story
as seen from the Pembroke perspective.
On 2/18/23 1:36 AM, Marco Moock wrote:
I heard that he had other problems (health?), but I dunno if that
is true.
I hope that's not the case.
But that's the type of things that would make a hardware problem take
much longer to resolve.
His silence is deafening.
William Stickers:
His silence is deafening.
Last time I heard from Paolo, he was in very bad health and
feared for his life. It would be great if someone from
Italy were able to contact him and his relations and
friends, to find a way the community could help him, e.g.
via PayPal or Patreon.
Anton Shepelev wrote:
William Stickers:
His silence is deafening.
Last time I heard from Paolo, he was in very bad health and
feared for his life. It would be great if someone from
Italy were able to contact him and his relations and
friends, to find a way the community could help him, e.g.
via PayPal or Patreon.
I'm very sorry to hear that and I'm sure most people
reading this would join me in wishing him a speedy
recovery.
Anton Shepelev wrote:
William Stickers:
His silence is deafening.
Last time I heard from Paolo, he was in very bad health and
feared for his life. It would be great if someone from
Italy were able to contact him and his relations and
friends, to find a way the community could help him, e.g.
via PayPal or Patreon.
I'm very sorry to hear that and I'm sure most people
reading this would join me in wishing him a speedy
recovery.
Did he mention the health issue?
Is it just those two newsgroups being blocked by Paganini & Mixmin?
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
with such as Alex de Joode & admins at paganini, neodome, and netfront respectively.
Those people above are heroes to me for all the thankless work they perform for me in terms of supporting my abilitity to converse on Usenet by keeping the dignity of my privacy intact.
Thank you all.
Those people above are heroes to me for all the thankless work they perform >> for me in terms of supporting my abilitity to converse on Usenet by keeping >> the dignity of my privacy intact.
Thank you all.
Thank's to you Incubus.
Sincerely
Ivo Gandolfo
Running a no-registration NNTP server sounds like about as much fun as repeatedly hitting yourself in the head with a hammer, but people have
weird hobbies.
On 2/17/23 2:37 AM, Marco Moock wrote:
RAID failure, recovery takes some time.
We're well beyond the time needed to recover from a RAID failure.
Perhaps the RAID card itself died and a new one needed to be acquired
which needed funding.
Replacing a disk, even ordering it, is faster.
Restoring from backups on a new RAID is faster.
There's more than /just/ a RAID failure.
Maybe the RAID failure was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Grant Taylor wrote:
{...}
Maybe the RAID failure was the straw that broke the camel's back.
More than likely. If he was bringing it back he'd have found a way to
post something to that effect. His silence is deafening.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 22:00:24 -0700, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 2/17/23 2:37 AM, Marco Moock wrote:
RAID failure, recovery takes some time.
We're well beyond the time needed to recover from a RAID failure.
Perhaps the RAID card itself died and a new one needed to be acquired
which needed funding.
Replacing a disk, even ordering it, is faster.
Restoring from backups on a new RAID is faster.
There's more than /just/ a RAID failure.
Maybe the RAID failure was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Why does he even have RAID, I recall not only does he just carry text
groups, he also has stated he has a short (few months) retention period,
he certainly doesn't need "space"
Thank you!
Incubus
none:
Did he mention the health issue?
No.
About 67% of my users
are from TOR, another 12% from other anonymization services (eg VPN),
about 8% are from users without authentication, the rest are from
registered users. All my services are free-as-beer. Registered or not.
On Feb 21, 2023, Ivo Gandolfo wrote (in articleBundle.
<news:tt3fof$29qtf$1@paganini.bofh.team>):
About 67% of my users
are from TOR, another 12% from other anonymization services (eg VPN),
about 8% are from users without authentication, the rest are from
registered users. All my services are free-as-beer. Registered or not.
How does someone post to Usenet from TOR?
The only way I know how to use TOR is via the Firefox TOR Browser
https://www.torproject.org/download/
Is Usenet posting accessible through the TOR Firefox web browser?
How?
RAID - Redundant Array of Independent Disks.
It ain't there for space, 'cept mebbe 'tween yore ears Mr. Eustace
Haney.
Redundancy - technical, the inclusion of extra components which are not strictly necessary to functioning, in case of failure in other
components.
"a high degree of redundancy is built into the machinery installation".
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 11:54:20 |
Calls: | 10,389 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 14,061 |
Messages: | 6,416,869 |
Posted today: | 1 |