How about the other way around, surfacing usenet
onto these aggregators/distributors?
On 02/28/2025 03:56 PM, Doc O'Leary wrote:snip
For your reference, records indicate that
I'm not even sure *how* anyone without an account on the server already
could begin to try it out. I, too, am not sure the gateway functions like >> any Usenet user would expect. To my thinking, the "groups" should be
based on hashtags, not the user's info. But I suppose that does properly
reflect the one dimensional nature of social media.
How about the other way around, surfacing usenet
onto these aggregators/distributors?
How about the other way around, surfacing usenet
onto these aggregators/distributors?
For your reference, records indicate that
Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
How about the other way around, surfacing usenet
onto these aggregators/distributors?
I'm about as interested in social media leeches as I am in "AI" leeches.
If Google Groups taught us anything, it's that people who are only
interested in picking Usenet's bones clean should *not* be thought of as >friends.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 498 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 20:50:22 |
Calls: | 9,827 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 13,761 |
Messages: | 6,191,557 |