• Re: Co-governance

    From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Wed Sep 6 03:18:20 2023
    On 2023-09-06, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    An authoritative and well argued position. National are not fighting
    with ACT over this - they are happy to avoid too many racist nutters
    in their ranks;

    Those are on the Labour ranks.

    but if ACT can bring their votes in the most
    objectionable policies can be quietly shelved.

    That is what MMP is about, and also democracy. Working things through by reasoned debate.


    https://thespinoff.co.nz/atea/05-09-2023/what-would-act-in-government-mean-for-co-governance-and-the-treaty
    from that article:
    "Finlayson – who enacted several co-governance initiatives during his
    time in government – also supports the kaupapa. In an interview with E-Tangata last year, he said the Crown “went out of its way to breach”
    the “unqualified exercise of . . . [Maori] chieftainship over their
    lands, villages and . . . treasures”, and co-governance helped right
    those wrongs. Finlayson said he wanted New Zealanders to accept that
    iwi involvement in state activities is good and natural. “I will
    continue to talk about co-governance as something to be embraced, not
    feared – and some people won’t like it. Bad luck,” he said to
    E-Tangata. Speaking to RNZ, Finlayson said those who oppose
    co-governance were the “sour right” who employed “racist, resentful rhetoric”. “We’ve just got to leave those losers behind and move on,”
    he noted, adding, “there’s a new regime, get with it, folks.” Although
    he supports co-governance, Finlayson said Labour had explained the
    concept poorly and he would like to see a more respectful and civil
    debate."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)