1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • The fox hired to run the hen house

    From Gordon@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 7 03:46:48 2024
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235456/corrections-calls-ey-review-sexual-harassment-processes


    Some one needs to get some common sense at corrections. Surely employing a company who has has major sexual harassment issuses is not fit for purpose
    to carry out a sexual harrassment review of another company. How it got to
    meet the all of the conditions and was the only one suitable is also mind boggling.

    Let us hope that this had nothing to do the the present Government.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Gordon on Sun Apr 7 21:18:01 2024
    On 7 Apr 2024 03:46:48 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235456/corrections-calls-ey-review-sexual-harassment-processes


    Some one needs to get some common sense at corrections. Surely employing a >company who has has major sexual harassment issuses is not fit for purpose
    to carry out a sexual harrassment review of another company. How it got to >meet the all of the conditions and was the only one suitable is also mind >boggling.

    Let us hope that this had nothing to do the the present Government.

    A new contract to a large consultancy on such an issue would have had
    to have been signed of by the Minister - remember that government
    Ministers are looking at expenditure on a line by line basis, and the
    selection of EY may well have been based on a sales pitch that they
    understand stop further complaints and bury the issue. Do you believe
    Mark Mitchell has made a mistake?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sun Apr 7 20:22:40 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Apr 2024 03:46:48 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235456/corrections-calls-ey-review-sexual-harassment-processes


    Some one needs to get some common sense at corrections. Surely employing a >>company who has has major sexual harassment issuses is not fit for purpose >>to carry out a sexual harrassment review of another company. How it got to >>meet the all of the conditions and was the only one suitable is also mind >>boggling.

    Let us hope that this had nothing to do the the present Government.

    A new contract to a large consultancy on such an issue would have had
    to have been signed of by the Minister - remember that government
    Ministers are looking at expenditure on a line by line basis, and the >selection of EY may well have been based on a sales pitch that they >understand stop further complaints and bury the issue. Do you believe
    Mark Mitchell has made a mistake?
    Un;ess you can provide evidence of the above you are lying once more (or is it still?).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)