An interesting article, that makes it clear that our regulatoryAbsolute nonsense. You and the people who wrote that silly account know nothing whatsoever about what capability DIA have. Because they lose people does not mean they have less capability, although some people do think in those overly simplistic ways (don't you?).
credibility can matter, and that the ham-fisted lack of thought being
given to the demands for blanket cuts may well put our Country at
risk. Remember that line that Luxon pushed that cuts would be
investigated "line by line" - in this case the relevant Minister is
Brooke van Velden an MP since 2020. She may have got the End of Life
bill through for ACT, but she clearly knows little about Anti-Money >Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism - or their importance
to New Zealand. The public servants are not able to go public on this
sort of concern - it is good to hear concerns from professionals in
the field.
Risk Management is clearly not something the current government caresNonsense.
about - there will be a mess for the next government to pick up - and
yes that will require additional staff in the public sector!
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dia-cuts-put-nz-path-fatfs-dreaded-grey-list-martin-dilly-cams-audit-jcqmc/
Absolute nonsense. You and the people who wrote that silly account know nothing
An interesting article, that makes it clear that our regulatory
credibility can matter, and that the ham-fisted lack of thought being
given to the demands for blanket cuts may well put our Country at
risk. Remember that line that Luxon pushed that cuts would be
investigated "line by line" - in this case the relevant Minister is
Brooke van Velden an MP since 2020. She may have got the End of Life
bill through for ACT, but she clearly knows little about Anti-Money >>Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism - or their importance
to New Zealand. The public servants are not able to go public on this
sort of concern - it is good to hear concerns from professionals in
the field.
whatsoever about what capability DIA have. Because they lose people does not >mean they have less capability, although some people do think in those overly >simplistic ways (don't you?).
Nonsense.
Risk Management is clearly not something the current government cares
about - there will be a mess for the next government to pick up - and
yes that will require additional staff in the public sector!
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:33:36 -0000 (UTC), TonyWhy?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dia-cuts-put-nz-path-fatfs-dreaded-grey-list-martin-dilly-cams-audit-jcqmc/
Absolute nonsense. You and the people who wrote that silly account know >>nothing
An interesting article, that makes it clear that our regulatory >>>credibility can matter, and that the ham-fisted lack of thought being >>>given to the demands for blanket cuts may well put our Country at
risk. Remember that line that Luxon pushed that cuts would be >>>investigated "line by line" - in this case the relevant Minister is >>>Brooke van Velden an MP since 2020. She may have got the End of Life
bill through for ACT, but she clearly knows little about Anti-Money >>>Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism - or their importance
to New Zealand. The public servants are not able to go public on this >>>sort of concern - it is good to hear concerns from professionals in
the field.
whatsoever about what capability DIA have. Because they lose people does not >>mean they have less capability, although some people do think in those overly >>simplistic ways (don't you?).
Have a look at the author of the article:
https://www.mdaml.co.nz/
and
https://www.fionahall-law.com/
Nonsense.
Risk Management is clearly not something the current government cares >>>about - there will be a mess for the next government to pick up - and
yes that will require additional staff in the public sector!
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dia-cuts-put-nz-path-fatfs-dreaded-grey-list-martin-dilly-cams-audit-jcqmc/
An interesting article, that makes it clear that our regulatory
credibility can matter, and that the ham-fisted lack of thought being
given to the demands for blanket cuts may well put our Country at
risk. Remember that line that Luxon pushed that cuts would be
investigated "line by line" - in this case the relevant Minister is
Brooke van Velden an MP since 2020. She may have got the End of Life
bill through for ACT, but she clearly knows little about Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism - or their importance
to New Zealand. The public servants are not able to go public on this
sort of concern - it is good to hear concerns from professionals in
the field.
Risk Management is clearly not something the current government cares
about - there will be a mess for the next government to pick up - and
yes that will require additional staff in the public sector!
On 2024-04-25, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, the government is increasing risk - we can all hope that it is not
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dia-cuts-put-nz-path-fatfs-dreaded-grey-list-martin-dilly-cams-audit-jcqmc/
An interesting article, that makes it clear that our regulatory
credibility can matter, and that the ham-fisted lack of thought being
given to the demands for blanket cuts may well put our Country at
risk. Remember that line that Luxon pushed that cuts would be
investigated "line by line" - in this case the relevant Minister is
Brooke van Velden an MP since 2020. She may have got the End of Life
bill through for ACT, but she clearly knows little about Anti-Money
Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism - or their importance
to New Zealand. The public servants are not able to go public on this
sort of concern - it is good to hear concerns from professionals in
the field.
Risk Management is clearly not something the current government cares
about - there will be a mess for the next government to pick up - and
yes that will require additional staff in the public sector!
Building the excuse right here!
On 25 Apr 2024 23:03:23 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:You have failed to show that. And so has the author of the article.
On 2024-04-25, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, the government is increasing risk
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dia-cuts-put-nz-path-fatfs-dreaded-grey-list-martin-dilly-cams-audit-jcqmc/
An interesting article, that makes it clear that our regulatory
credibility can matter, and that the ham-fisted lack of thought being
given to the demands for blanket cuts may well put our Country at
risk. Remember that line that Luxon pushed that cuts would be
investigated "line by line" - in this case the relevant Minister is
Brooke van Velden an MP since 2020. She may have got the End of Life
bill through for ACT, but she clearly knows little about Anti-Money
Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism - or their importance
to New Zealand. The public servants are not able to go public on this
sort of concern - it is good to hear concerns from professionals in
the field.
Risk Management is clearly not something the current government cares
about - there will be a mess for the next government to pick up - and
yes that will require additional staff in the public sector!
Building the excuse right here!
- we can all hope that it is not
us or our bank that fails due to money laundering or a bank getting
involved in financing terrorism. The [previous government were talking
about a guarantee scheme to cover the first $100,000 of client funds
in the event of a bank going under, but I don't think it got
introduced. Even if you do not lose money directly, a bank failure
would hit commerce badly, even if the government bails out many
customers.
Still, you seem to believe that regulators do not need to be involved
. . . Here's hoping you are correct, but it is a bit like a large
store not keeping security staff as they are costing money . . .
On 25 Apr 2024 23:03:23 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-04-25, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, the government is increasing risk - we can all hope that it is not
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dia-cuts-put-nz-path-fatfs-dreaded-grey-list-martin-dilly-cams-audit-jcqmc/
An interesting article, that makes it clear that our regulatory
credibility can matter, and that the ham-fisted lack of thought being
given to the demands for blanket cuts may well put our Country at
risk. Remember that line that Luxon pushed that cuts would be
investigated "line by line" - in this case the relevant Minister is
Brooke van Velden an MP since 2020. She may have got the End of Life
bill through for ACT, but she clearly knows little about Anti-Money
Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism - or their importance
to New Zealand. The public servants are not able to go public on this
sort of concern - it is good to hear concerns from professionals in
the field.
Risk Management is clearly not something the current government cares
about - there will be a mess for the next government to pick up - and
yes that will require additional staff in the public sector!
Building the excuse right here!
us or our bank that fails due to money laundering or a bank getting
involved in financing terrorism. The [previous government were talking
about a guarantee scheme to cover the first $100,000 of client funds
in the event of a bank going under, but I don't think it got
introduced. Even if you do not lose money directly, a bank failure
would hit commerce badly, even if the government bails out many
customers.
Still, you seem to believe that regulators do not need to be involved
. . . Here's hoping you are correct, but it is a bit like a large
store not keeping security staff as they are costing money . . .
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 37:39:37 |
| Calls: | 9,798 |
| Files: | 13,751 |
| Messages: | 6,189,368 |