• One News political poll last night

    From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 30 07:50:44 2024
    Interesting to see the hysterics over what was and is always likely to
    happen from time to time. NZF is always going to be the weak link in
    the Government with just a small dip in support (to under 5%) taking
    them out of Parliament and changing the seat count substantially.

    It did not warrant 'breaking news' status. Their political editor was
    all over the fact that National/ACT would no longer be the government
    if this was an actual election result - ignoring the fact that it is
    not an election result.

    No wonder they, as part of the MSM, are losing trust. These polls,
    regardless of the results, are worthy of taking the 6:30pm human
    interest slot for the night. The relevance of these polls is more to
    do with trends and measuring the effect on polls of events from time
    to time.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Crash on Mon Apr 29 19:53:19 2024
    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    Interesting to see the hysterics over what was and is always likely to
    happen from time to time. NZF is always going to be the weak link in
    the Government with just a small dip in support (to under 5%) taking
    them out of Parliament and changing the seat count substantially.

    It did not warrant 'breaking news' status. Their political editor was
    all over the fact that National/ACT would no longer be the government
    if this was an actual election result - ignoring the fact that it is
    not an election result.

    No wonder they, as part of the MSM, are losing trust. These polls, >regardless of the results, are worthy of taking the 6:30pm human
    interest slot for the night. The relevance of these polls is more to
    do with trends and measuring the effect on polls of events from time
    to time.

    These bottom feeders think that the public is stupid - they would do well to find another occupation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Crash on Mon Apr 29 20:09:53 2024
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    No wonder they, as part of the MSM, are losing trust. These polls, >regardless of the results, are worthy of taking the 6:30pm human
    interest slot for the night.

    These are fake polls, worthy of inclusion into the fake news. They
    are false gauges of irrelevant things. Pure bunk.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mutley@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Tue Apr 30 09:52:04 2024
    wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    No wonder they, as part of the MSM, are losing trust. These polls, >>regardless of the results, are worthy of taking the 6:30pm human
    interest slot for the night.

    These are fake polls, worthy of inclusion into the fake news. They
    are false gauges of irrelevant things. Pure bunk.

    They asked 100 public servants in Wellington who may lose their jobs
    hence the results.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Tue Apr 30 10:50:01 2024
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:09:53 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    No wonder they, as part of the MSM, are losing trust. These polls, >>regardless of the results, are worthy of taking the 6:30pm human
    interest slot for the night.

    These are fake polls, worthy of inclusion into the fake news. They
    are false gauges of irrelevant things. Pure bunk.

    You have provided no evidence that this was a fake poll. Certainly we
    did not need the breathless ads before hand urging us to tune in a
    this time to hear big new news. There was nothing surprising about the
    poll results of the poll. The government is making life harder for
    most people - they committed to rewards landlords but little for
    anyone else, and are clearly making life harder for the rest of us -
    costs are going up, including any user pay charges they have managed
    to increase, but no corresponding reduction in taxes for the rest of
    us.

    Luxon at least reacted to the failure of two Ministers, but at the
    same time showed how weak he was in not getting an NZ First Minister
    out for not telling cabinet about $42 billion of future savings
    through not scrapping the smoke-free changes put in by Labour - now we
    see the UK Conservative government adopting them! The reality is that
    Luxon is not in control of the government, just of the National Party.

    Today brought news that rentals are keeping on increasing, in part due
    to the government slowing down building new state housing stock, and
    building companies getting into difficulties due to the lack of new
    building and costs getting too high for most purchasers

    If Shane Jones gets a coal mine reopened there will be a bigger
    back-lash, and there are no signs that they will back down from racist
    policies in ignoring the Treaty of Waitangi, or to get the electricity
    industry off maximising profit by having to use coal fired Huntly
    every so often to keep profits rolling - there are plenty of further
    generation plans already approved - the gen companies just like having
    Coal there to justify price hikes every so often . . .

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-d296gUjgM&ab_channel=BriefButSpectacular

    The government has to start ding something to justify the voted they
    received, not just the money that was donated - including through
    Atlas Network entities that have influence in each of the Coalition
    parties . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Mon Apr 29 23:01:11 2024
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:09:53 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

    These are fake polls, worthy of inclusion into the fake news.

    These same sorts of polls correlated with the downfall of previous
    Governments, so they have some significance on that basis: history
    repeating itself.

    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of
    poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it just
    150 days into its first term.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Crash on Tue Apr 30 00:56:48 2024
    On 2024-04-29, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    Interesting to see the hysterics over what was and is always likely to
    happen from time to time. NZF is always going to be the weak link in
    the Government with just a small dip in support (to under 5%) taking
    them out of Parliament and changing the seat count substantially.

    It did not warrant 'breaking news' status. Their political editor was
    all over the fact that National/ACT would no longer be the government
    if this was an actual election result - ignoring the fact that it is
    not an election result.

    No wonder they, as part of the MSM, are losing trust. These polls, regardless of the results, are worthy of taking the 6:30pm human
    interest slot for the night. The relevance of these polls is more to
    do with trends and measuring the effect on polls of events from time
    to time.

    The phrase "Honeymoon period" applies in this case. The incoming Government ratings drop a few months after coming in.

    The if an election was held today idea should be used when an election is coming up not when the new Government has got it feet under the table less
    than six months ago. Not being at all profressional and ignoring the fact
    that the next election is 30 months away.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Tue Apr 30 01:57:24 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:09:53 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

    These are fake polls, worthy of inclusion into the fake news.

    These same sorts of polls correlated with the downfall of previous >Governments, so they have some significance on that basis: history
    repeating itself.
    There is only one poll that matters, that is an election - all others are a waste of time and suitable for you to enjoy whatever fantasies you harbour.

    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of
    poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it just >150 days into its first term.
    That is not true.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Apr 30 01:59:38 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:09:53 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    No wonder they, as part of the MSM, are losing trust. These polls, >>>regardless of the results, are worthy of taking the 6:30pm human
    interest slot for the night.

    These are fake polls, worthy of inclusion into the fake news. They
    are false gauges of irrelevant things. Pure bunk.

    You have provided no evidence that this was a fake poll. Certainly we
    did not need the breathless ads before hand urging us to tune in a
    this time to hear big new news. There was nothing surprising about the
    poll results of the poll. The government is making life harder for
    most people - they committed to rewards landlords but little for
    anyone else, and are clearly making life harder for the rest of us -
    costs are going up, including any user pay charges they have managed
    to increase, but no corresponding reduction in taxes for the rest of
    us.

    Luxon at least reacted to the failure of two Ministers, but at the
    same time showed how weak he was in not getting an NZ First Minister
    out for not telling cabinet about $42 billion of future savings
    through not scrapping the smoke-free changes put in by Labour - now we
    see the UK Conservative government adopting them! The reality is that
    Luxon is not in control of the government, just of the National Party.

    Today brought news that rentals are keeping on increasing, in part due
    to the government slowing down building new state housing stock, and
    building companies getting into difficulties due to the lack of new
    building and costs getting too high for most purchasers

    If Shane Jones gets a coal mine reopened there will be a bigger
    back-lash, and there are no signs that they will back down from racist >policies in ignoring the Treaty of Waitangi, or to get the electricity >industry off maximising profit by having to use coal fired Huntly
    every so often to keep profits rolling - there are plenty of further >generation plans already approved - the gen companies just like having
    Coal there to justify price hikes every so often . . .

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-d296gUjgM&ab_channel=BriefButSpectacular

    The government has to start ding something to justify the voted they >received, not just the money that was donated - including through
    Atlas Network entities that have influence in each of the Coalition
    parties . . .
    You have provided no evidence that any poll other than an election is of value - they never have been and never will be - you are indulging in fantasy.
    You have also gone streets off topic -get a grip on yourself littl;e boy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Tue Apr 30 01:40:10 2024
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of
    poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it just >150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is
    "giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not
    the government.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Tue Apr 30 04:07:12 2024
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of >>poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it
    just 150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything.

    But you were willing to accept these sorts of poll results when they
    predicted the downfall of a Labour-led Government, weren’t you?

    Don’t use circular arguments to try to justify why you pay attention to
    some sources of evidence but not others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Tue Apr 30 04:38:22 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of >>>poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it >>>just 150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything.

    But you were willing to accept these sorts of poll results when they >predicted the downfall of a Labour-led Government, weren’t you?

    Don’t use circular arguments to try to justify why you pay attention to >some sources of evidence but not others.
    You really do think you are so very clever, do you not? Self deception is alive and well in Hamilton I see, shame really for what is otherwise a pleasant city. Your accusation is not what Willy Nilly did - you made an assumption - (you know what that caues don't you? Well don't you?)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Tue Apr 30 05:04:56 2024
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:
    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything.

    But you were willing to accept these sorts of poll results when they >predicted the downfall of a Labour-led Government, weren’t you?
    Don’t use circular arguments to try to justify why you pay attention to >some sources of evidence but not others.

    There are more things in Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, "Lawrence".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Thu May 2 23:37:29 2024
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of >>poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it just >>150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is >"giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not
    the government.

    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024

    Notice how the Roy Morgan poll, released a few days after, and showing
    the government with a comfortable majority, was not covered by our
    media at all. Our extremist media "gives", that's the takeaway.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Fri May 3 00:15:48 2024
    wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of >>>poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it just >>>150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is >>"giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not
    the government.

    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024

    Notice how the Roy Morgan poll, released a few days after, and showing
    the government with a comfortable majority, was not covered by our
    media at all. Our extremist media "gives", that's the takeaway.
    Ah, but this is a biased poll, apparently. Right Rich?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Tony on Fri May 3 02:46:10 2024
    On 2024-05-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of >>>>poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it just >>>>150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is >>>"giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not
    the government.

    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024

    Notice how the Roy Morgan poll, released a few days after, and showing
    the government with a comfortable majority, was not covered by our
    media at all. Our extremist media "gives", that's the takeaway.
    Ah, but this is a biased poll, apparently. Right Rich?

    Which just goes to show why we need a General poll every three years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Gordon on Fri May 3 15:17:04 2024
    On 3 May 2024 02:46:10 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-05-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of >>>>>poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it just >>>>>150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is >>>>"giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not >>>>the government.
    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024 >>>
    Notice how the Roy Morgan poll, released a few days after, and showing >>>the government with a comfortable majority, was not covered by our
    media at all. Our extremist media "gives", that's the takeaway.
    Ah, but this is a biased poll, apparently. Right Rich?

    Which just goes to show why we need a General poll every three years.

    That the two polls are so different (although both have government
    support declining since the election) does indicate that polls of only
    around 1000 people are perhaps not large enough to be reliable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Fri May 3 03:35:05 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 3 May 2024 02:46:10 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-05-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote: >>>>>On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of >>>>>>poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it >>>>>>just
    150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is >>>>>"giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not >>>>>the government.
    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024 >>>>
    Notice how the Roy Morgan poll, released a few days after, and showing >>>>the government with a comfortable majority, was not covered by our >>>>media at all. Our extremist media "gives", that's the takeaway.
    Ah, but this is a biased poll, apparently. Right Rich?

    Which just goes to show why we need a General poll every three years.

    That the two polls are so different (although both have government
    support declining since the election) does indicate that polls of only
    around 1000 people are perhaps not large enough to be reliable.
    Anybody who takes notice of these polls is delusional, thay are and always have been nowhere near worthwhile, regardless of the number of respondents.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Fri May 3 21:24:04 2024
    On Fri, 3 May 2024 03:35:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 3 May 2024 02:46:10 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-05-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote: >>>>>>On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts of >>>>>>>poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it >>>>>>>just
    150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is >>>>>>"giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not >>>>>>the government.
    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024 >>>>>
    Notice how the Roy Morgan poll, released a few days after, and showing >>>>>the government with a comfortable majority, was not covered by our >>>>>media at all. Our extremist media "gives", that's the takeaway.
    Ah, but this is a biased poll, apparently. Right Rich?

    Which just goes to show why we need a General poll every three years.

    That the two polls are so different (although both have government
    support declining since the election) does indicate that polls of only >>around 1000 people are perhaps not large enough to be reliable.
    Anybody who takes notice of these polls is delusional, thay are and always have
    been nowhere near worthwhile, regardless of the number of respondents.

    It is telling that there has not been a Curia poll released recently -
    the taxpayer Union is probably getting polls sufficiently regularly
    that they can try to limit public releases to polls that show ACT, NZ
    First and National in a better light . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Fri May 3 20:34:28 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 3 May 2024 03:35:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 3 May 2024 02:46:10 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-05-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote: >>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts >>>>>>>>of
    poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it >>>>>>>>just
    150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is >>>>>>>"giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not >>>>>>>the government.
    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024

    Notice how the Roy Morgan poll, released a few days after, and showing >>>>>>the government with a comfortable majority, was not covered by our >>>>>>media at all. Our extremist media "gives", that's the takeaway.
    Ah, but this is a biased poll, apparently. Right Rich?

    Which just goes to show why we need a General poll every three years.

    That the two polls are so different (although both have government >>>support declining since the election) does indicate that polls of only >>>around 1000 people are perhaps not large enough to be reliable.
    Anybody who takes notice of these polls is delusional, thay are and always >>have
    been nowhere near worthwhile, regardless of the number of respondents.

    It is telling that there has not been a Curia poll released recently -
    the taxpayer Union is probably getting polls sufficiently regularly
    that they can try to limit public releases to polls that show ACT, NZ
    First and National in a better light . . .
    You are proof that polls between elections only appeal to idiots and only serve to boost the egos of political parties.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Sat May 4 11:37:52 2024
    On Fri, 3 May 2024 20:34:28 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 3 May 2024 03:35:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 3 May 2024 02:46:10 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-05-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote: >>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts >>>>>>>>>of
    poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it >>>>>>>>>just
    150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is >>>>>>>>"giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not >>>>>>>>the government.
    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024

    Notice how the Roy Morgan poll, released a few days after, and showing >>>>>>>the government with a comfortable majority, was not covered by our >>>>>>>media at all. Our extremist media "gives", that's the takeaway.
    Ah, but this is a biased poll, apparently. Right Rich?

    Which just goes to show why we need a General poll every three years.

    That the two polls are so different (although both have government >>>>support declining since the election) does indicate that polls of only >>>>around 1000 people are perhaps not large enough to be reliable.
    Anybody who takes notice of these polls is delusional, thay are and always >>>have
    been nowhere near worthwhile, regardless of the number of respondents.

    It is telling that there has not been a Curia poll released recently -
    the taxpayer Union is probably getting polls sufficiently regularly
    that they can try to limit public releases to polls that show ACT, NZ
    First and National in a better light . . .
    You are proof that polls between elections only appeal to idiots and only serve
    to boost the egos of political parties.
    I am sure there are a few people that agree with you, Tony, https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/05/04/the-secret-diary-of-coalition-sheriff-luxon/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sat May 4 00:17:02 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 3 May 2024 20:34:28 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 3 May 2024 03:35:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 3 May 2024 02:46:10 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-05-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:10 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote: >>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>The difference being, those previous Governments only saw these sorts >>>>>>>>>>of
    poll results in their third (and final) terms; this one is getting it >>>>>>>>>>just
    150 days into its first term.

    Nope, this government is not "getting"anything. Rather, the media is >>>>>>>>>"giving" it. This is a reflection on today's extreme-left media, not >>>>>>>>>the government.
    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024

    Notice how the Roy Morgan poll, released a few days after, and showing >>>>>>>>the government with a comfortable majority, was not covered by our >>>>>>>>media at all. Our extremist media "gives", that's the takeaway. >>>>>>> Ah, but this is a biased poll, apparently. Right Rich?

    Which just goes to show why we need a General poll every three years. >>>>>
    That the two polls are so different (although both have government >>>>>support declining since the election) does indicate that polls of only >>>>>around 1000 people are perhaps not large enough to be reliable. >>>>Anybody who takes notice of these polls is delusional, thay are and always >>>>have
    been nowhere near worthwhile, regardless of the number of respondents.

    It is telling that there has not been a Curia poll released recently - >>>the taxpayer Union is probably getting polls sufficiently regularly
    that they can try to limit public releases to polls that show ACT, NZ >>>First and National in a better light . . .
    You are proof that polls between elections only appeal to idiots and only >>serve
    to boost the egos of political parties.
    I am sure there are a few people that agree with you, Tony, >https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/05/04/the-secret-diary-of-coalition-sheriff-luxon/ The only problem with these cuts is that there are nowhere near enough. There is a huge surplus of public servants courtesy of the last government's excesses.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)